business-model-canvas
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when clarifying how a business, product, offer, or venture creates, delivers, and captures value. Use when applying the Business Model Canvas consulting method and when a user asks for Business Model Canvas, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ajstars1/founder-stacktheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Zafer-Liu/Data-Analysis-Agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- thaofvn-coca06/funnel-mkttheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- tupe12334/instincttheir own version, first seen Aug 17, 2026
- flpbalada/fb-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
- deciqAI/knowledge-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use value-proposition-canvas.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
fahadnariSkillvalue-proposition-canvas
Creates a Value Proposition Canvas mapping customer needs to product value Use when: value proposition canvas, value prop canvas, customer jobs, jobs pains gains, value map.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- Zafer-Liu/Data-Analysis-Agent★ 2.6ksame name
- thaofvn-coca06/funnel-mkt★ 19same name
- deciqAI/knowledge-skills★ 13same name
- flpbalada/fb-skills★ 8same name
- RogCP/claude-skill-business-model-canvas★ 2same name
- ajstars1/founder-stack★ 1same name
- nandanosql/all_in_one_pm_skills★ 1same name
- tupe12334/instinct★ 1same name
- ajstars1/startup-coach★ 0same name
- walternate/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Business Model Canvas as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 14
Check alignment across value proposition, channel, revenue, and cost logic.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not treat a completed canvas as proof that a business model works.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Business Model Canvas
Use this skill to run Business Model Canvas as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Cover the nine BMC blocks: customer segments, value propositions, channels, relationships, revenue, resources, activities, partners, and costs.
- Check alignment across value proposition, channel, revenue, and cost logic.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- business or offer
- customer segments
- value proposition
- operating model
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not treat a completed canvas as proof that a business model works. Use it to expose connected assumptions about customers, value, operations, revenue, and cost that still need testing.
Adjacent Methods
pricing-strategy-check: focus on price architecture and value capture.go-to-market-diagnosis: diagnose segment, offer, channel, message, and sales-motion fit.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Define model scope | Company/product/service/offer and time horizon. | Choose the business model unit being described. | Canvas scope. |
| Fill customer/value blocks | Customer segments, jobs/pains/gains, value proposition. | Define who is served and what value is promised. | Customer/value blocks. |
| Fill delivery/revenue blocks | Channels, customer relationships, revenue streams. | Describe how value reaches customers and how money is made. | Delivery/revenue blocks. |
| Fill operating/cost blocks | Key activities, resources, partners, cost structure. | Describe what must exist to deliver the model. | Operating/cost blocks. |
| Test alignment | All nine blocks. | Check contradictions, weak assumptions, and missing proof. | Model risks and test plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Scope And Customer
Business / offer:
Target segment:
Customer problem / job:
Evidence:
### 2. Value And Delivery
| Block | Current design | Evidence | Risk / contradiction |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### 3. Economics
| Revenue source | Price logic | Cost driver | Key assumption | Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 4. Priority Tests
| Hypothesis | Minimum test | Owner | Timing | Pass / fail threshold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Scope And Customer, Value And Delivery, Economics; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

