pestel-analysis
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when market, policy, macro, or operating context may materially affect strategy or risk. Use when applying the PESTEL Analysis consulting method and when a user asks for PESTEL Analysis, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- The-Utopia-Studio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- agrivisionai/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 14, 2026
- DIAL-Studio/pm-agent-harness-kittheir own version, first seen Jul 8, 2026
- nandanosql/all_in_one_pm_skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 28, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills★ 7.7ksame name
- DIAL-Studio/pm-agent-harness-kit★ 12same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1same name
- nandanosql/all_in_one_pm_skills★ 1same name
- vijaysuperpositionist/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run PESTEL Analysis as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 14
Keep only external forces that can change the decision.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use PESTEL to assess internal capability or to collect trends with no decision consequence.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PESTEL Analysis
Use this skill to run PESTEL Analysis as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Scan Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal forces.
- Keep only external forces that can change the decision.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- market or situation
- geography
- time horizon
- known external trends
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use PESTEL to assess internal capability or to collect trends with no decision consequence. Use it for external macro factors that could change a strategic choice, assumption, timing, or risk.
Adjacent Methods
porter-five-forces: industry structure and profit pressure.competitive-positioning: buyer-facing choice versus alternatives.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Set horizon and geography | Market, geography, industry, time horizon. | Define external environment boundary. | PESTEL scope. |
| Scan six categories | Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal evidence. | List external forces under each category with source or confidence. | PESTEL factor list. |
| Filter material forces | Factor list, decision objective. | Keep only factors that can change opportunity, risk, cost, demand, or feasibility. | Material external forces. |
| Assess impact and timing | Material factors. | Rate direction, magnitude, likelihood, timing, and uncertainty. | Prioritized PESTEL table. |
| Define responses | Prioritized table. | Recommend adaptation, watch items, hedges, or validation needs. | External-context action plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Scope And Horizon
Market / geography:
Decision:
Time horizon:
Source cut-off:
### 2. External Forces
| Category | Force | Evidence / source | Direction | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Material Implications
| Force | Impact | Uncertainty | Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### 4. Response And Signposts
| Response | Owner | Leading sign | Revisit trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Scope And Horizon, External Forces, Material Implications; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

