agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/pestel-analysis/SKILL.md

pestel-analysis

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when market, policy, macro, or operating context may materially affect strategy or risk. Use when applying the PESTEL Analysis consulting method and when a user asks for PESTEL Analysis, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run PESTEL Analysis as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep only external forces that can change the decision.

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use PESTEL to assess internal capability or to collect trends with no decision consequence.

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 85

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

PESTEL Analysis

Use this skill to run PESTEL Analysis as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Scan Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal forces.
  • Keep only external forces that can change the decision.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • market or situation
  • geography
  • time horizon
  • known external trends

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use PESTEL to assess internal capability or to collect trends with no decision consequence. Use it for external macro factors that could change a strategic choice, assumption, timing, or risk.

Adjacent Methods

  • porter-five-forces: industry structure and profit pressure.
  • competitive-positioning: buyer-facing choice versus alternatives.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Set horizon and geographyMarket, geography, industry, time horizon.Define external environment boundary.PESTEL scope.
Scan six categoriesPolitical, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal evidence.List external forces under each category with source or confidence.PESTEL factor list.
Filter material forcesFactor list, decision objective.Keep only factors that can change opportunity, risk, cost, demand, or feasibility.Material external forces.
Assess impact and timingMaterial factors.Rate direction, magnitude, likelihood, timing, and uncertainty.Prioritized PESTEL table.
Define responsesPrioritized table.Recommend adaptation, watch items, hedges, or validation needs.External-context action plan.

Output Template

### 1. Scope And Horizon
Market / geography:
Decision:
Time horizon:
Source cut-off:

### 2. External Forces
| Category | Force | Evidence / source | Direction | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### 3. Material Implications
| Force | Impact | Uncertainty | Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 4. Response And Signposts
| Response | Owner | Leading sign | Revisit trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Scope And Horizon, External Forces, Material Implications; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.