agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/scenario-planning/SKILL.md

scenario-planning

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when external uncertainty is material and a single forecast would create false confidence. Use when applying the Scenario Planning consulting method and when a user asks for Scenario Planning, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run Scenario Planning as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use critical uncertainties and signposts, not predictions.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use for a short-term forecast when one outcome can be estimated reliably.

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 86

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Scenario Planning

Use this skill to run Scenario Planning as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Use critical uncertainties and signposts, not predictions.
  • Separate no-regret actions from contingent options.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • strategic question
  • time horizon
  • critical uncertainties
  • known trends

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use for a short-term forecast when one outcome can be estimated reliably. Scenarios explore a small set of high-impact uncertainties; they are not predictions or collections of generic risks.

Adjacent Methods

  • critical-uncertainties: identify the variables before building scenarios.
  • pre-mortem: rehearse failure of one chosen plan.
  • risk-matrix: prioritize known risk events.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Frame decision and horizonStrategic question, time horizon, geography/market.State what decision must stay robust across futures.Scenario scope.
Identify uncertaintiesExternal trends, macro forces, market shifts.Separate relatively certain trends from high-impact uncertainties.Uncertainty list.
Build scenariosTop uncertainties and trends.Create 2-4 plausible scenarios with names and narratives.Scenario set.
Derive implicationsScenario set and business model/strategy.Assess risks, opportunities, and constraints in each scenario.Scenario implications.
Choose options and signpostsImplications.Define no-regret moves, contingent bets, and early indicators.Scenario action plan.

Output Template

### 1. Decision And Horizon
Focal decision:
Time horizon:
Geography / market:
Predetermined elements:

### 2. Critical Uncertainties
| Uncertainty | Range | Impact | Evidence | Signpost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### 3. Scenarios
| Scenario | Coherent conditions | Implication | Vulnerable assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 4. Robust Moves And Signposts
| Move | Robust / contingent | Trigger | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Decision And Horizon, Critical Uncertainties, Scenarios; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.