scenario-planning
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when external uncertainty is material and a single forecast would create false confidence. Use when applying the Scenario Planning consulting method and when a user asks for Scenario Planning, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ironyjk/strategy-frameworkstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- deciqAI/knowledge-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 7, 2026
- gokulsvision/crewm8-cfo-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 29, 2026
- CAPP-Financials/Consulting_Braintheir own version, first seen Apr 24, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- ironyjk/strategy-frameworks★ 14same name
- deciqAI/knowledge-skills★ 13same name
- gokulsvision/crewm8-cfo-skills★ 2same name
- CAPP-Financials/Consulting_Brain★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Scenario Planning as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use critical uncertainties and signposts, not predictions.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use for a short-term forecast when one outcome can be estimated reliably.
- Distinctive: line 86
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Scenario Planning
Use this skill to run Scenario Planning as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Use critical uncertainties and signposts, not predictions.
- Separate no-regret actions from contingent options.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- strategic question
- time horizon
- critical uncertainties
- known trends
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use for a short-term forecast when one outcome can be estimated reliably. Scenarios explore a small set of high-impact uncertainties; they are not predictions or collections of generic risks.
Adjacent Methods
critical-uncertainties: identify the variables before building scenarios.pre-mortem: rehearse failure of one chosen plan.risk-matrix: prioritize known risk events.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Frame decision and horizon | Strategic question, time horizon, geography/market. | State what decision must stay robust across futures. | Scenario scope. |
| Identify uncertainties | External trends, macro forces, market shifts. | Separate relatively certain trends from high-impact uncertainties. | Uncertainty list. |
| Build scenarios | Top uncertainties and trends. | Create 2-4 plausible scenarios with names and narratives. | Scenario set. |
| Derive implications | Scenario set and business model/strategy. | Assess risks, opportunities, and constraints in each scenario. | Scenario implications. |
| Choose options and signposts | Implications. | Define no-regret moves, contingent bets, and early indicators. | Scenario action plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Decision And Horizon
Focal decision:
Time horizon:
Geography / market:
Predetermined elements:
### 2. Critical Uncertainties
| Uncertainty | Range | Impact | Evidence | Signpost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Scenarios
| Scenario | Coherent conditions | Implication | Vulnerable assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### 4. Robust Moves And Signposts
| Move | Robust / contingent | Trigger | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Decision And Horizon, Critical Uncertainties, Scenarios; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

