competitive-positioning
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when a strategy, offer, pitch, or account plan needs sharper differentiation. Use when applying the Competitive Positioning consulting method and when a user asks for Competitive Positioning, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zime-ai/zime-gtm-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketingtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- LMTYdotcom/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 28, 2026
- lpelty/infinite-headcounttheir own version, first seen Mar 31, 2026
- Dragoon0x/product-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 24, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- LMTYdotcom/skills★ 84same name
- zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills★ 19same name
- brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing★ 9same name
- Dragoon0x/product-skills★ 4same name
- lpelty/infinite-headcount★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Competitive Positioning as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use without a target segment, relevant alternatives, buying criteria, and evidence of why customers choose.
- Distinctive: line 86
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Competitive Positioning
Use this skill to run Competitive Positioning as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Compare against direct competitors, substitutes, and the status quo.
- A differentiator must matter to the buyer and be credible to prove.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- offering
- target customer
- competitors or alternatives
- proof points
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use without a target segment, relevant alternatives, buying criteria, and evidence of why customers choose. Positioning is a defensible choice, not a slogan or feature inventory.
Adjacent Methods
pestel-analysis: macro environment.porter-five-forces: industry economics.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Define target buyer | Segment, buying trigger, use case, decision criteria. | State whose choice you are trying to win and against what alternatives. | Positioning frame. |
| Map alternatives | Direct competitors, substitutes, status quo. | List alternatives and the buyer reason to choose each. | Competitive alternative map. |
| Compare value dimensions | Customer criteria, proof, features, outcomes, price, risk. | Compare each option on buyer-relevant dimensions. | Positioning comparison. |
| Test differentiators | Comparison and evidence. | Keep only differentiators that matter, are credible, and are hard to dismiss. | Defensible differentiators. |
| Write position and proof | Differentiators, objections, sales/channel context. | Create positioning statement, proof points, and objection responses. | Positioning package. |
Output Template
### 1. Buyer And Choice Frame
Target buyer:
Decision situation:
Alternatives considered:
Evidence base:
### 2. Comparison
| Buyer criterion | Us | Alternative | Evidence | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Defensible Differentiation
| Differentiator | Why buyer cares | Proof | Competitor response risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### 4. Position And Validation
Positioning statement:
Proof needed next:
Buyer test:
Decision threshold:
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Buyer And Choice Frame, Comparison, Defensible Differentiation; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

