pre-mortem
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use before launching a plan, project, deal, or change when failure modes should be surfaced early. Use when applying the Pre Mortem consulting method and when a user asks for Pre Mortem, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
30 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rahul-kulkarni105/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cwhited26/pocket-agent-starter-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- takayoshitoyoda05/claude-ml-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, prioritize-assumptions and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-existing
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Also in 7 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-assumptions
Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.
Also in 7 projects that use this
45ckSkillpestle-analysis
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillpositioning-ideas
Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillproduct-name
Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +5 more from skytiger6724
- +1 more from About-Intelligence
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- avelikiy/great_cto★ 112same name
- ysskrishna/ai-agent-skills★ 20same name
- MbappeWU/murder-board★ 15same name
- jackjin1997/ClawForge★ 12same name
- sergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026★ 9same name
- carlkibler/agent-skills★ 6same name
- broomva/skills★ 4same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Pre Mortem as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use prospective hindsight: assume the plan failed, then explain why.
- Very specific: line 26
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 30
Do not use after a failure has already occurred.
- Distinctive: line 86
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pre Mortem
Use this skill to run Pre Mortem as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Use prospective hindsight: assume the plan failed, then explain why.
- Convert failure causes into prevention actions and early warnings.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- planned action
- success criteria
- timeline
- stakeholders
- known risks
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use after a failure has already occurred; use root-cause analysis instead. A pre-mortem requires a specific plan and time horizon, not a generic list of things that might go wrong.
Adjacent Methods
risk-matrix: prioritize known risk events after they are identified.scenario-planning: compare plausible external futures, not failure causes of one plan.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Describe plan | Plan, launch date, success criteria. | State the plan as if the team believes it will work. | Plan frame. |
| Assume failure | Future date and failed outcome. | Write a short future failure narrative. | Failure scenario. |
| Generate causes | Team concerns, dependencies, assumptions. | List plausible reasons the plan failed. | Failure cause list. |
| Prioritize preventable causes | Cause list, likelihood, impact, controllability. | Pick the causes worth preventing now. | Priority failure modes. |
| Design prevention | Priority causes. | Define prevention actions, early warnings, owners, and contingencies. | Pre-mortem action plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Plan And Failure Horizon
Plan:
Launch / decision date:
Assumed failure date:
Success definition:
### 2. Failure Narrative
The plan failed because:
Observed consequences:
Earliest warning:
### 3. Failure Modes
| Failure mode | Cause | Preventability | Evidence | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 4. Prevention Plan
| Prevention / contingency | Owner | Timing | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Plan And Failure Horizon, Failure Narrative, Failure Modes; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

