agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/pre-mortem/SKILL.md

pre-mortem

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use before launching a plan, project, deal, or change when failure modes should be surfaced early. Use when applying the Pre Mortem consulting method and when a user asks for Pre Mortem, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

30 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, prioritize-assumptions and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-experiments-existing

    Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    prioritize-assumptions

    Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • 45ckSkill

    pestle-analysis

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    positioning-ideas

    Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    product-name

    Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +5 more from skytiger6724
  • +1 more from About-Intelligence

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run Pre Mortem as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use prospective hindsight: assume the plan failed, then explain why.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use after a failure has already occurred.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 86

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pre Mortem

Use this skill to run Pre Mortem as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Use prospective hindsight: assume the plan failed, then explain why.
  • Convert failure causes into prevention actions and early warnings.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • planned action
  • success criteria
  • timeline
  • stakeholders
  • known risks

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use after a failure has already occurred; use root-cause analysis instead. A pre-mortem requires a specific plan and time horizon, not a generic list of things that might go wrong.

Adjacent Methods

  • risk-matrix: prioritize known risk events after they are identified.
  • scenario-planning: compare plausible external futures, not failure causes of one plan.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Describe planPlan, launch date, success criteria.State the plan as if the team believes it will work.Plan frame.
Assume failureFuture date and failed outcome.Write a short future failure narrative.Failure scenario.
Generate causesTeam concerns, dependencies, assumptions.List plausible reasons the plan failed.Failure cause list.
Prioritize preventable causesCause list, likelihood, impact, controllability.Pick the causes worth preventing now.Priority failure modes.
Design preventionPriority causes.Define prevention actions, early warnings, owners, and contingencies.Pre-mortem action plan.

Output Template

### 1. Plan And Failure Horizon
Plan:
Launch / decision date:
Assumed failure date:
Success definition:

### 2. Failure Narrative
The plan failed because:
Observed consequences:
Earliest warning:

### 3. Failure Modes
| Failure mode | Cause | Preventability | Evidence | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### 4. Prevention Plan
| Prevention / contingency | Owner | Timing | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Plan And Failure Horizon, Failure Narrative, Failure Modes; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.