customer-segmentation
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when treating all customers the same is obscuring priorities, offer design, or service strategy. Use when applying the Customer Segmentation consulting method and when a user asks for Customer Segmentation, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- berriosb/data-analytics-agentstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- sidchaudhary/gtm-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 21, 2026
- Natan-Mohart/24-strategy-skills-for-claudetheir own version, first seen Aug 8, 2026
- CAPP-Financials/Consulting_Braintheir own version, first seen Apr 24, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- Natan-Mohart/24-strategy-skills-for-claude★ 41same name
- sidchaudhary/gtm-skills★ 1same name
- berriosb/data-analytics-agents★ 0same name
- CAPP-Financials/Consulting_Brain★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Customer Segmentation as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 14
Use needs, behavior, value, buying context, and service cost.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use without a defined customer population and evidence of differences that change needs, economics, behavior, or treatment.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Customer Segmentation
Use this skill to run Customer Segmentation as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Segment for a decision, not for taxonomy beauty.
- Use needs, behavior, value, buying context, and service cost.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- customer universe
- needs or behaviors
- value data
- usage or buying evidence
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use without a defined customer population and evidence of differences that change needs, economics, behavior, or treatment. Avoid segments based on convenient demographics that do not change a decision.
Adjacent Methods
jobs-to-be-done: understand progress and switching forces within a segment.empathy-map: build an evidence-based snapshot of one segment or actor.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Define segmentation decision | Business question, offer, service, or GTM decision. | State what the segmentation must help decide. | Segmentation purpose. |
| Choose variables | Needs, behaviors, value, buying context, service cost. | Select dimensions tied to the decision. | Segmentation dimensions. |
| Create segments | Customer data, interviews, usage, purchase patterns. | Group customers with clear inclusion/exclusion rules. | Segment definitions. |
| Profile segments | Segment definitions plus value and needs data. | Describe size, value, pain, channel, willingness to pay, and support needs. | Segment profiles. |
| Prioritize actions | Profiles and strategy constraints. | Choose target, adapt, test, serve differently, or deprioritize. | Segment strategy. |
Output Template
### 1. Segmentation Purpose
Decision to support:
Population:
Available evidence:
Excluded scope:
### 2. Segment Definitions
| Segment | Defining need / behavior | Size / value evidence | Service need | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Segment Profiles
| Segment | Trigger | Desired outcome | Barrier | Best offer / channel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 4. Action And Validation
| Segment | Action | Owner | Signal | Re-segmentation trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Segmentation Purpose, Segment Definitions, Segment Profiles; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

