agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/customer-segmentation/SKILL.md

customer-segmentation

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when treating all customers the same is obscuring priorities, offer design, or service strategy. Use when applying the Customer Segmentation consulting method and when a user asks for Customer Segmentation, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run Customer Segmentation as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use needs, behavior, value, buying context, and service cost.

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use without a defined customer population and evidence of differences that change needs, economics, behavior, or treatment.

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 85

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Customer Segmentation

Use this skill to run Customer Segmentation as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Segment for a decision, not for taxonomy beauty.
  • Use needs, behavior, value, buying context, and service cost.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • customer universe
  • needs or behaviors
  • value data
  • usage or buying evidence

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use without a defined customer population and evidence of differences that change needs, economics, behavior, or treatment. Avoid segments based on convenient demographics that do not change a decision.

Adjacent Methods

  • jobs-to-be-done: understand progress and switching forces within a segment.
  • empathy-map: build an evidence-based snapshot of one segment or actor.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Define segmentation decisionBusiness question, offer, service, or GTM decision.State what the segmentation must help decide.Segmentation purpose.
Choose variablesNeeds, behaviors, value, buying context, service cost.Select dimensions tied to the decision.Segmentation dimensions.
Create segmentsCustomer data, interviews, usage, purchase patterns.Group customers with clear inclusion/exclusion rules.Segment definitions.
Profile segmentsSegment definitions plus value and needs data.Describe size, value, pain, channel, willingness to pay, and support needs.Segment profiles.
Prioritize actionsProfiles and strategy constraints.Choose target, adapt, test, serve differently, or deprioritize.Segment strategy.

Output Template

### 1. Segmentation Purpose
Decision to support:
Population:
Available evidence:
Excluded scope:

### 2. Segment Definitions
| Segment | Defining need / behavior | Size / value evidence | Service need | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### 3. Segment Profiles
| Segment | Trigger | Desired outcome | Barrier | Best offer / channel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### 4. Action And Validation
| Segment | Action | Owner | Signal | Re-segmentation trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Segmentation Purpose, Segment Definitions, Segment Profiles; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.