agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/balanced-scorecard/SKILL.md

balanced-scorecard

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when performance management needs a broader view than financial or single KPI tracking. Use when applying the Balanced Scorecard consulting method and when a user asks for Balanced Scorecard, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run Balanced Scorecard as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use financial, customer, internal process, and learning/capability perspectives.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use before the strategy, intended outcomes, and cause-and-effect logic are clear.

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 85

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Balanced Scorecard

Use this skill to run Balanced Scorecard as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Use financial, customer, internal process, and learning/capability perspectives.
  • Limit metrics per perspective so the scorecard stays usable.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • strategy or objective
  • current metrics
  • stakeholders
  • time horizon

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use before the strategy, intended outcomes, and cause-and-effect logic are clear. A balanced scorecard is a small management system, not a catalogue of every available KPI.

Adjacent Methods

  • metrics-tree: decompose one outcome into causal drivers and guardrails.
  • north-star-metric: define one leading value metric for a product or service.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Clarify strategyStrategic objective and business context.State the strategy the scorecard must translate into measures.Strategy frame.
Set four perspectivesFinancial, customer, internal process, learning/capability context.Define objectives under each perspective.Perspective objectives.
Choose measuresObjectives, data availability, owners.Select a few measures per perspective with formula and cadence.Scorecard metrics.
Set targets and initiativesMeasures, baseline, ambition, resources.Define target, owner, initiative, and review rhythm.Targets and initiatives.
Check balanceScorecard draft.Remove overload and check whether short-term financial goals crowd out capability and customer measures.Balanced scorecard.

Output Template

### 1. Strategy And Scope
Strategy objective:
Time horizon:
Target operating unit:
Key assumptions:

### 2. Four-Perspective Scorecard
| Perspective | Objective | Measure | Baseline | Target | Initiative | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

### 3. Cause-And-Effect Logic
| Leading objective | Expected effect | Lagging outcome | Evidence strength |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 4. Review Cadence
| Measure | Review frequency | Trigger | Corrective action |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Strategy And Scope, Four-Perspective Scorecard, Cause-And-Effect Logic; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.