effort-impact-matrix
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when there are multiple possible next actions and the user needs quick wins, major projects, fill-ins, or deprioritized items. Use when applying the Effort Impact Matrix consulting method and when a user asks for Effort Impact Matrix, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Effort Impact Matrix as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 14
Use quick wins, major bets, fill-ins, and deprioritize/defer.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use when impact and effort cannot be estimated on a comparable basis or when hard dependencies determine the sequence.
- Distinctive: line 87
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Effort Impact Matrix
Use this skill to run Effort Impact Matrix as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Normalize items so each one is an executable action.
- Use quick wins, major bets, fill-ins, and deprioritize/defer.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- candidate actions
- impact estimate
- effort estimate
- time or resource constraints
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use when impact and effort cannot be estimated on a comparable basis or when hard dependencies determine the sequence. This is a relative triage tool, not a full investment case.
Adjacent Methods
rice-scoring: prioritize a backlog using Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort.wsjf-prioritization: sequence work using Cost of Delay divided by Job Size.decision-matrix: make a one-time option choice using explicit weighted criteria.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| List actions | Candidate actions or initiatives. | Rewrite broad ideas into one-action items. | Normalized action list. |
| Define scoring anchors | Objective, constraints, available capacity. | Define what high/medium/low impact and effort mean. | Scoring scale. |
| Score each action | Action list, evidence, effort estimates. | Rate impact and effort separately; mark confidence. | Scored action table. |
| Place quadrants | Scored table. | State the case-specific high/low boundary for each axis or a rule for medium/boundary items before placement. Map high impact/low effort to quick wins, high/high to major bets, low/low to fill-ins, and low impact/high effort to defer/drop. Without a defensible mapping, retain provisional / unplaced items rather than silently assigning medium to a quadrant. | Effort-impact matrix. |
| Choose sequence | Matrix, dependencies, timing, risk. | Recommend first actions, later actions, and items to reject or validate. | Sequenced action plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Scope And Anchors
Decision horizon:
Impact definition:
Effort definition:
High/low boundary or medium / boundary-item handling:
Constraints:
### 2. Action Scores
| Action | Impact | Effort | Evidence / assumption | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Quadrant Map
| Quadrant | Actions | Why |
|---|---|---|
| | | |
### 4. Sequence
| Order | Action | Owner | Timing | Expected signal | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Scope And Anchors, Action Scores, Quadrant Map; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

