agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/change-event-timeline/SKILL.md

change-event-timeline

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when the timing of events, turning points, stakeholder behavior changes, or cause-and-effect sequence must be clarified. Use when applying a change event timeline, turning-point analysis, event sequence map, or before-after signal review.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to find what changed, when it changed, and which change most likely matters.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, mark it as unknown, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

    line 27
  3. Very specific:

    Do not use when timing is irrelevant or the decision is purely comparative.

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not invent exact dates when only sequence is known.

    line 75
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the timeline focused on events that affect the decision.

    line 79

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Change Event Timeline

Use this skill to find what changed, when it changed, and which change most likely matters.

Method Notes

  • Many diagnoses fail because they treat all facts as equally current.
  • A timeline helps distinguish long-standing background facts from recent trigger events.
  • The goal is to identify turning points, causal candidates, and validation questions.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • situation or decision question
  • key events and dates or approximate sequence
  • before-state and after-state
  • stakeholders involved in each event
  • observed behavior, decision, metric, or risk change

If an input is missing, mark it as unknown, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use when timing is irrelevant or the decision is purely comparative. Use decision-matrix or weighted-scorecard instead.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Define the before-stateBaseline relationship, process, metric, or expectation.Describe the stable pattern before the relevant change.Baseline state.
Build event listDates, approximate sequence, stakeholder actions, decisions.Put events in chronological order; include uncertainty when dates are approximate.Event timeline.
Mark turning pointsEvent list, behavior or outcome change.Identify events after which behavior, risk, support, urgency, or outcome changed.Turning-point candidates.
Distinguish trigger vs backgroundTimeline, evidence strength, alternative explanations.Separate events that merely existed from events that likely changed the system.Trigger/background classification.
Infer causal hypothesesTurning points, stakeholder moves, external events.Generate possible explanations that fit the timeline.Timeline-based hypotheses.
Define next evidenceWeak links, unknown dates, missing stakeholder rationale.Specify what evidence would confirm or weaken the inferred turning point.Timeline validation plan.

Output Template

### 1. Baseline Before The Change
- Before-state:
- Normal pattern:
- What would have continued without disruption:

### 2. Change Event Timeline
| Timing | Event | Stakeholders | Evidence strength | What changed after this? | Trigger / background / unknown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  | strong / medium / weak / missing |  |  |

### 3. Likely Turning Points
1.
2.
3.

### 4. Timeline-Based Hypotheses
| Hypothesis | Supporting timeline evidence | What would weaken it | Next check |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 5. Action Implication
- Most important change to respond to:
- What not to over-interpret:
- Next validation:

Quality Gate

  • Do not invent exact dates when only sequence is known.
  • Separate sequence from causation.
  • Identify background conditions that matter but did not trigger the change.
  • Highlight missing dates or missing reasons if they change the diagnosis.
  • Keep the timeline focused on events that affect the decision.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.