agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/fishbone-diagram/SKILL.md

fishbone-diagram

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when a problem may have multiple operational, human, process, system, or environmental causes. Use when applying the Fishbone Diagram consulting method and when a user asks for Fishbone Diagram, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run Fishbone Diagram as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use categories such as people, process, systems, policy, environment, and measurement.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use for a single verified linear cause or treat category branches as proven causes.

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 86

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fishbone Diagram

Use this skill to run Fishbone Diagram as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Use categories such as people, process, systems, policy, environment, and measurement.
  • Prioritize cause branches for evidence testing.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • problem statement
  • observed symptoms
  • process context
  • candidate cause categories

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use for a single verified linear cause or treat category branches as proven causes. Fishbone analysis is for exploring multiple cause families that still require evidence.

Adjacent Methods

  • five-whys-root-cause: follow one selected branch deeper.
  • systems-thinking: use for feedback and behavior over time.
  • constraint-analysis: use for a proven binding bottleneck.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Define effectProblem statement, defect, service failure, or outcome gap.Place the problem at the head of the fishbone.Effect statement.
Choose categoriesDomain context.Select people, process, systems, policy, environment, measurement, or custom categories.Cause categories.
Populate causesEvidence, team input, process facts.List possible causes under each category.Fishbone cause map.
Mark evidenceCause map and available data.Label causes as evidenced, assumed, contradicted, or unknown.Evidence-coded fishbone.
Prioritize testsEvidence-coded fishbone.Choose top cause branches and validation tests.Root-cause test plan.

Output Template

### 1. Effect And Boundary
Observed effect:
Location / period:
Baseline:
In scope / out of scope:

### 2. Cause Map
| Category | Possible cause | Evidence status | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 3. Priority Causes
| Cause | Impact if true | Testability | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 4. Test Plan
| Test | Owner | Timing | Confirming / disconfirming signal |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Effect And Boundary, Cause Map, Priority Causes; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.