metrics-tree
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when a decision or plan needs measurable success criteria, driver logic, and diagnostic metrics. Use when applying the Metrics Tree consulting method and when a user asks for Metrics Tree, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- RizwanZafaris/product-manager-OStheir own version, first seen Sep 3, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- RizwanZafaris/product-manager-OS★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Metrics Tree as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 13
Start with one outcome, then decompose drivers and leading indicators.
- Distinctive: line 14
Add guardrails to prevent gaming or local optimization.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use before the outcome metric and decision purpose are defined, or when proposed driver relationships cannot be tested.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Metrics Tree
Use this skill to run Metrics Tree as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Start with one outcome, then decompose drivers and leading indicators.
- Add guardrails to prevent gaming or local optimization.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- north-star outcome
- business model or process
- available data
- owners
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use before the outcome metric and decision purpose are defined, or when proposed driver relationships cannot be tested. A metrics tree explains performance logic; it is not a dashboard inventory.
Adjacent Methods
north-star-metric: select one leading expression of delivered value.balanced-scorecard: balance financial, customer, process, and capability objectives.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Define top outcome | Business/product objective and time window. | Write the outcome metric and why it matters. | Top metric. |
| Decompose drivers | Business model, funnel, process, user behavior. | Break the outcome into mathematical or causal drivers. | Driver tree. |
| Add leading indicators | Driver tree and process timing. | Identify measures that move before the top outcome changes. | Leading indicator set. |
| Add guardrails | Risk, quality, cost, customer experience, fairness constraints. | Choose metrics that prevent gaming. | Guardrail metrics. |
| Define operating use | Owners, data sources, review cadence. | Set formula, owner, threshold, and action trigger. | Metric operating plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Outcome Definition
Top outcome:
Population / scope:
Time window:
Unit:
### 2. Driver Tree
| Level | Metric | Formula | Causal rationale | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Leading Signals And Guardrails
| Metric | Type | Threshold | Data source | Risk controlled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 4. Operating Cadence
| Review | Frequency | Decision triggered | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Outcome Definition, Driver Tree, Leading Signals And Guardrails; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

