power-interest-grid
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when stakeholders need to be grouped into manage closely, keep satisfied, keep informed, or monitor categories. Use when applying the Power Interest Grid consulting method and when a user asks for Power Interest Grid, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- 45ck/business-analysis-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 28, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- 45ck/business-analysis-skills★ 28same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- account-planSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Power Interest Grid as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use four cells: manage closely, keep satisfied, keep informed, monitor.
- Very specific: line 25
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not use when informal influence, stakeholder stance, or relationship networks require a more detailed map.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Power Interest Grid
Use this skill to run Power Interest Grid as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Use four cells: manage closely, keep satisfied, keep informed, monitor.
- Power means ability to change the outcome; interest means concern about the outcome.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- stakeholder list
- decision context
- power evidence
- interest evidence
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use when informal influence, stakeholder stance, or relationship networks require a more detailed map. The grid is a coarse engagement triage, not proof of motives or support.
Adjacent Methods
stakeholder-power-map: add stance, incentives, confidence, informal influence, and next asks.raci-matrix: clarify execution responsibility after stakeholder strategy is set.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Define the change or decision | Decision/change, deadline, affected groups. | State what outcome the grid is meant to influence. | Grid scope. |
| Identify stakeholders | Named people, teams, customers, regulators, partners. | List actors and remove duplicates or irrelevant observers. | Stakeholder list. |
| Score power and interest | Authority, influence, dependency, impact, concern level. | Use evidence for each axis; retain an unknown axis and provisional placement when evidence is missing. A title alone does not establish power, interest or stance. | 2x2 power-interest grid. |
| Choose engagement strategy | Grid placement and relationship constraints. | Map high power / high interest: manage closely; high power / low interest: keep satisfied; low power / high interest: keep informed; low power / low interest: monitor. Explain any engagement adjustment for relationship constraints rather than changing the axis evidence. | Engagement category per actor. |
| Define communication actions | Category, message need, channel, owner, cadence. | Specify message, sender, timing, and feedback signal. | Communication and engagement plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Decision And Stakeholders
Decision:
Decision owner:
Deadline:
Stakeholders:
### 2. Grid
| Stakeholder | Power | Interest | Evidence / confidence | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 3. Engagement Strategy
| Stakeholder | Objective | Message / ask | Channel | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 4. Movement Signals
| Stakeholder | Expected signal | Watch-out | Escalation |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Decision And Stakeholders, Grid, Engagement Strategy; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

