agentleFS
fzfcleefzfclee/consulting-skills/skills/account-plan/SKILL.md

account-plan

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when pursuing, defending, expanding, or recovering a client account or project opportunity. Use when applying the Account Plan consulting method and when a user asks for Account Plan, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to run Account Plan as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not treat a friendly contact as the account plan.

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    If an input is missing, do not block automatically.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not use without a named account, a defined business need, relevant stakeholders, a value hypothesis, and a next customer decision.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

    line 86

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Account Plan

Use this skill to run Account Plan as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Map decision rights, relationship strength, competitor position, proof gaps, and next ask.
  • Do not treat a friendly contact as the account plan.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • account background
  • opportunity
  • stakeholders
  • competitors
  • relationship evidence

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use without a named account, a defined business need, relevant stakeholders, a value hypothesis, and a next customer decision. It is not a generic market or campaign plan.

Adjacent Methods

  • stakeholder-power-map: diagnose power, stance, and hidden vetoes around one decision.
  • deal-strategy-map: plan the buying path and next commercial commitment for one opportunity.

Step-by-Step Execution

StepRequired inputHow to executeOutput
Set account objectiveAccount, opportunity, target outcome, timeline.State win/expand/defend/recover objective and commercial stakes.Account objective.
Map account structureStakeholders, decision rights, budget, users, influencers.Map formal and informal buying network.Account stakeholder map.
Diagnose value and proofClient business problem, current supplier, competitor, proof assets.Clarify why change is valuable and what proof is missing.Value/proof diagnosis.
Identify risks and pathsStakeholder map, competitor position, relationship gaps.Find blockers, sponsor path, political risks, and fallback routes.Account risk/path map.
Build 30-day planRisks, paths, meeting opportunities, owner capacity.Define next asks, messages, meetings, proof, and validation signals.30-day account plan.

Output Template

### 1. Account Objective And Evidence
Account objective:
Decision deadline:
Confirmed facts:
Assumptions to test:

### 2. Stakeholders And Buying Path
| Stakeholder | Role / power | Current stance | Evidence / confidence | Needed movement | Next ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |

### 3. Value, Competition, And Risk
| Buyer need | Proposed value | Proof | Competitor / alternative | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### 4. 30-Day Action Plan
| Action | Owner | Timing | Expected commitment / signal | Fallback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Quality Gate

  • Produce the method-specific outputs for Account Objective And Evidence, Stakeholders And Buying Path, Value, Competition, And Risk; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
  • Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
  • Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
  • Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
  • State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
  • Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.