account-plan
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when pursuing, defending, expanding, or recovering a client account or project opportunity. Use when applying the Account Plan consulting method and when a user asks for Account Plan, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- CSPulse/customer-success-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- geekfujiwara/copilot-cowork-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- sidchaudhary/gtm-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 21, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- geekfujiwara/copilot-cowork-skills★ 13same name
- CSPulse/customer-success-skills★ 2same name
- sidchaudhary/gtm-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-analysisSkill
- abductive-reasoningSkill
- affinity-diagramSkill
- assumption-inventorySkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- break-even-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- change-event-timelineSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- communications-planSkill
- competitive-positioningSkill
- constraint-analysisSkill
- cost-benefit-analysisSkill
- critical-uncertaintiesSkill
- customer-segmentationSkill
- customer-success-health-scoreSkill
- deal-strategy-mapSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- effort-impact-matrixSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- evidence-mapSkill
- fifteen-percent-solutionsSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- fishbone-diagramSkill
- five-whys-root-causeSkill
- force-field-analysisSkill
- go-to-market-diagnosisSkill
- hypothesis-treeSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- issue-treeSkill
- jobs-to-be-doneSkill
- kano-modelSkill
- mece-frameworkSkill
- metrics-treeSkill
- mind-map-analysisSkill
- min-specsSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- porter-five-forcesSkill
- power-interest-gridSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- pricing-strategy-checkSkill
- raci-matrixSkill
- rice-scoringSkill
- risk-matrixSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- service-blueprintSkill
- signal-vs-noise-filterSkill
- stakeholder-power-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- user-journey-mappingSkill
- validation-planSkill
- weighted-scorecardSkill
- win-loss-reviewSkill
- wsjf-prioritizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to run Account Plan as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not treat a friendly contact as the account plan.
- Very specific: line 26
If an input is missing, do not block automatically.
- Distinctive: line 30
Do not use without a named account, a defined business need, relevant stakeholders, a value hypothesis, and a next customer decision.
- Distinctive: line 86
Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Account Plan
Use this skill to run Account Plan as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.
Method Notes
- Map decision rights, relationship strength, competitor position, proof gaps, and next ask.
- Do not treat a friendly contact as the account plan.
Required Inputs
Collect or infer these inputs before execution:
- account background
- opportunity
- stakeholders
- competitors
- relationship evidence
If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.
When Not To Use
Do not use without a named account, a defined business need, relevant stakeholders, a value hypothesis, and a next customer decision. It is not a generic market or campaign plan.
Adjacent Methods
stakeholder-power-map: diagnose power, stance, and hidden vetoes around one decision.deal-strategy-map: plan the buying path and next commercial commitment for one opportunity.
Step-by-Step Execution
| Step | Required input | How to execute | Output |
| Set account objective | Account, opportunity, target outcome, timeline. | State win/expand/defend/recover objective and commercial stakes. | Account objective. |
| Map account structure | Stakeholders, decision rights, budget, users, influencers. | Map formal and informal buying network. | Account stakeholder map. |
| Diagnose value and proof | Client business problem, current supplier, competitor, proof assets. | Clarify why change is valuable and what proof is missing. | Value/proof diagnosis. |
| Identify risks and paths | Stakeholder map, competitor position, relationship gaps. | Find blockers, sponsor path, political risks, and fallback routes. | Account risk/path map. |
| Build 30-day plan | Risks, paths, meeting opportunities, owner capacity. | Define next asks, messages, meetings, proof, and validation signals. | 30-day account plan. |
Output Template
### 1. Account Objective And Evidence
Account objective:
Decision deadline:
Confirmed facts:
Assumptions to test:
### 2. Stakeholders And Buying Path
| Stakeholder | Role / power | Current stance | Evidence / confidence | Needed movement | Next ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | |
### 3. Value, Competition, And Risk
| Buyer need | Proposed value | Proof | Competitor / alternative | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### 4. 30-Day Action Plan
| Action | Owner | Timing | Expected commitment / signal | Fallback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:Quality Gate
- Produce the method-specific outputs for Account Objective And Evidence, Stakeholders And Buying Path, Value, Competition, And Risk; do not substitute a generic framework summary.
- Tie every material score, causal claim, or stakeholder judgment to evidence or label it as an assumption.
- Include at least one disconfirming check, sensitivity, alternative explanation, or failure condition appropriate to the method.
- Convert the result into a named action or decision with an owner or stakeholder, timing, and observable signal.
- State missing inputs and the smallest validation action instead of inventing precision.
- Keep wording professional and plain enough that a smart non-specialist can use the output directly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

