paper-review
Skill2 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Leitura critica de artigo cientifico. Resume, avalia metodologia, pontos fortes/fracos e relevancia. Triggers on /paper-review.
27 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kfangw/research-opstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 70asunflower/70asunflower-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Go-MinSeong/paper-review-servicetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- bas1l/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Deadpoolmine/systematic-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- angadhn/botferencetheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use paper-writing.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MLNLP-WorldSkillpaper-writing
学术论文写作检查与优化助手。基于 MLNLP-World 社区整理的论文写作技巧，帮助检查和优化学术论文。Use when: (1) 检查论文 LaTeX 格式和排版, (2) 优化公式符号使用, (3) 改进图表设计, (4) 润色英文学术表达, (5) 检查参考文献格式, (6) 投稿前终稿检查, (7) 用户询问论文写作技巧或规范。
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 27
- EvoScientist/EvoSkills★ 481same name
- WenyuChiou/academic-writing-skills★ 405same name
- aspi6246/Claude-Code-Skills-for-Academics★ 153same name
- voidful/academic-skills★ 126same name
- AlexWortega/ai-peer-review-skill★ 63same name
- drpwchen/paper-review-and-digest★ 39same name
- bimajanuri/paper-review-skill★ 24same name
- TakaGoto/rag-learning-academy★ 24same name
- angadhn/botference★ 20same name
- borgr/paper-sharpener★ 19same name
17 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- abstractSkill
- artigoSkill
- author-creditSkill
- datasus-outcomeSkill
- desenho-metodologicoSkill
- graph-labSkill
- icSkill
- infograficoSkill
- journalSkill
- lab-expSkill
- latexSkill
- ml-checkpointsSkill
- ml-eval-reportSkill
- ml-pipelineSkill
- ml-timeseriesSkill
- paper-pngSkill
- paper-scaffoldSkill
- paperSkill
- papersSkill
- peer-reviewSkill
- radar-academicoSkill
- redSkill
- revisorSkill
- specSkill
- update-paperSkill
The file
Files
Skill: paper-review
Faz leitura critica estruturada de um artigo cientifico.
Entrada
- PDF do paper (ler com ferramenta de PDF)
- Ou URL/DOI do paper
Passos
1. Leitura completa
Ler o paper inteiro. Identificar:
- Titulo, autores, journal, ano
- Tipo: original research, review, meta-analysis, case report
2. Resumo estruturado
Objetivo: O que o estudo busca responder? Metodos: Desenho do estudo, populacao, intervencao/exposicao, desfecho, analise estatistica Resultados: Principais achados numericos Conclusao: O que os autores concluem?
3. Avaliacao critica
Pontos fortes:
- Tamanho amostral adequado?
- Metodologia robusta?
- Validacao externa?
- Reprodutibilidade?
Pontos fracos:
- Vieses (selecao, informacao, confusao)
- Limitacoes amostrais
- Generalizabilidade
- Conflitos de interesse
Metodologia estatistica:
- Testes apropriados?
- Multiplas comparacoes corrigidas?
- IC e p-values reportados?
- Tamanho de efeito clinicamente relevante?
4. Relevancia
- Como se relaciona com meus projetos atuais?
- O que posso aplicar/adaptar?
- Lacunas que posso explorar?
5. Output
Formato conciso em markdown com secoes acima. Maximo 1 pagina.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.