paper-review
Skill0 starsChanged 10 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Conduct reviewer-style, evidence-safe reviews of academic manuscripts across disciplines using progressive method, domain, review-round, and optional reviewer overlays. Use when the user asks for a critique, scientific review, priority comments, top-to-bottom review, revision-round assessment, prior-comment regression check, or review memo rather than ordinary drafting. Infer the smallest applicable module set from the conversation and manuscript; ask only when unresolved domain or review-profile ambiguity would materially change the review. Includes optional psychometrics and SEM, computational and LLM, water and CNHS, flood and hydrodynamics, and explicit Ethan-style modules.
27 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kfangw/research-opstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 70asunflower/70asunflower-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Go-MinSeong/paper-review-servicetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Deadpoolmine/systematic-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- angadhn/botferencetheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- TakaGoto/rag-learning-academytheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use paper-writing.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MLNLP-WorldSkillpaper-writing
学术论文写作检查与优化助手。基于 MLNLP-World 社区整理的论文写作技巧，帮助检查和优化学术论文。Use when: (1) 检查论文 LaTeX 格式和排版, (2) 优化公式符号使用, (3) 改进图表设计, (4) 润色英文学术表达, (5) 检查参考文献格式, (6) 投稿前终稿检查, (7) 用户询问论文写作技巧或规范。
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- WenyuChiou/academic-writing-skills★ 40596% same
Wrote their own version · 26
- EvoScientist/EvoSkills★ 481same name
- aspi6246/Claude-Code-Skills-for-Academics★ 153same name
- voidful/academic-skills★ 126same name
- AlexWortega/ai-peer-review-skill★ 63same name
- drpwchen/paper-review-and-digest★ 39same name
- bimajanuri/paper-review-skill★ 24same name
- TakaGoto/rag-learning-academy★ 24same name
- angadhn/botference★ 20same name
- borgr/paper-sharpener★ 19same name
- guruvamsi-policharla/paper-review-skill★ 17same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-writing-skillsSkill
- arch-diffSkill
- brainstorm-conversationSkill
- brainstorm-interviewSkill
- challengeSkill
- _code-conventionsSkill
- _commit-procedureSkill
- critiqueSkill
- daily-briefSkill
- deploy-workflowSkill
- doc-syncSkill
- email-to-chatSkill
- explain-visuallySkill
- humanizer_academicSkill
- ideaSkill
- mediatorSkill
- plan-commitSkill
- plan-createSkill
- plan-finishSkill
- plan-implementSkill
- plan-overviewSkill
- plan-prSkill
- _plan-resolveSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- profile-interviewSkill
- prompt-polishSkill
- publish-mainSkill
- scientific-article-writingSkill
- speakSkill
- upkeep-reviewSkill
- voice-latchSkill
- vscode-click-to-openSkill
- weekly-rollupSkill
- wrap-upSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.