agentleFS
MLNLP-WorldMLNLP-World/Paper-Writing-Tips/paper-writing/SKILL.md

paper-writing

Skill4.7k starsChanged 9 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

学术论文写作检查与优化助手。基于 MLNLP-World 社区整理的论文写作技巧,帮助检查和优化学术论文。Use when: (1) 检查论文 LaTeX 格式和排版, (2) 优化公式符号使用, (3) 改进图表设计, (4) 润色英文学术表达, (5) 检查参考文献格式, (6) 投稿前终稿检查, (7) 用户询问论文写作技巧或规范。

  • Other versions34 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 34

    1. wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep★ 18ksame name
    2. getcompanion-ai/feynman★ 10ksame name
    3. advaitpaliwal/feynman★ 10ksame name
    4. companion-inc/feynman★ 10ksame name
    5. ZimoLiao/scholaraio★ 577same name
    6. EvoScientist/EvoSkills★ 481same name
    7. SNL-UCSB/paper-writing-skill★ 181same name
    8. voidful/academic-skills★ 126same name
    9. TenureAI/PhD-Zero★ 52same name
    10. Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing★ 42same name

    24 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use ml-training-recipe, replication and 10 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • advaitpaliwalSkill

      ml-training-recipe

      Find implementable ML training recipes from papers, datasets, docs, and code. Use when the user wants to fine-tune, train, reproduce, or choose a practical ML method, dataset, hyperparameter setup, or benchmark recipe.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • advaitpaliwalSkill

      replication

      Plan a replication of a paper, claim, or benchmark, and execute only after an explicit environment choice. Use when the user asks to replicate results, reproduce an experiment, verify a claim empirically, or build a replication package.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • JimLiuSkill

      pdf-explore

      Use this skill when the user has attached a PDF, paper, report, or other document and the answer needs content from more than one place in it: summarize the methods or any other section, compare sections, find where a topic is discussed, read a value or label off a figure or chart, or find/list/extract every instance of something across the whole document (datasets, benchmarks, citations, figures, table rows, accession numbers — including appendices). Skip it only for a single lookup of 1–4 pages quoted in your very next response — `read_file(pages=[...])` attaches pages as images that are dropped from context after one turn, so multi-section answers end up re-reading the same ranges repeatedly. Parses the PDF once in the Python kernel: `pdf_pages` (pages as persistent text), `pdf_outline` (TOC), `pdf_scan` (rank pages by relevance), `pdf_map`/`pdf_extract` (per-page summary / structured fields via parallel haiku calls). For PDF creation/manipulation, use reportlab/pypdf directly.

      Also in 4 projects that use this

    • JaimeParkerSkill

      paper-code-audit

      Perform three-way cross-validation of a research paper by comparing the original paper text (via Zotero), official code implementation (via Git), and personal Obsidian notes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to "audit a paper", "verify paper claims against code", "cross-check notes with implementation", "triangulate paper + code + notes", "find discrepancies between paper and code", or mentions wanting a deep, structured comparison of a paper's claims against its implementation and their own notes. Also trigger when the user asks to "analyze this paper thoroughly" with code available, or when they want to systematically reconcile what the paper says, what the code does, and what their notes claim.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • brainbytes-devSkill

      alpha-research

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • Yusong-EnceladusSkill

      research-review

      Get a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

      Also in 6 projects that use this

    • +1 more from advaitpaliwal

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.