scope-check
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use during implementation to detect scope creep — when work drifts beyond the current spec/plan/story. Fires during sprints, after plan tasks, or when the designer suspects deviation. Compares current work against the stated scope. ShiningPlague-adopted: full implementation with priority-ordered scope document lookup (plan / spec / story / workstream) and 20% drift heuristic.
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anotherben/claude-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- momentmaker/kaijutsutheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sentimony/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- venus2099/codex-game-studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 10 projects that use this
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 26
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- CoralGame/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 19same name
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 17same name
- dvdarkin/claude-skills★ 11same name
- CodePhobiia/claude-roblox-game-studio★ 9same name
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 8same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository68 other files it gives its agents.
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- asset-specSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- estimateSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- goal-add-minorSkill
- goal-checkSkill
- goal-setSkill
- godot-engineSkill
- helpSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- narrative-designerSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- red-flag-scanSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- safety-pushSkill
- security-auditSkill
- session-closeSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- story-readinessSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- team-artSkill
- team-audioSkill
- team-combatSkill
- team-economySkill
- team-infraSkill
- team-levelSkill
- team-marketingSkill
- team-narrativeSkill
- team-polishSkill
- team-releaseSkill
- team-securitySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Scope Check
🌱 ShiningPlague-adopted. Originally Donchitos (barebones stub); battle-tested on a shipped Godot project. Upstream was a pointer-only file; this version is the full implementation — priority-ordered scope doc lookup, 20% drift heuristic, park-or-expand proposal.
Detect scope deviation by comparing current work against the governing spec, plan, or story.
If an artifact named here is absent: say so plainly in one line, skip that step, and continue. Never invent the file to satisfy a checklist, and never fail a close because an optional artifact was never created.
Procedure
1. Identify Governing Scope Document
Find the active scope document (in priority order):
- Active plan:
docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-*-plan.mdwith status 🚧 ACTIVE - Active spec:
docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-*-design.mdwith status 🚧 IN PROGRESS - Active story:
production/epics/<epic-slug>/*.mdwith status in-progress - Active workstream state:
production/workstreams/<name>.md→ "In Progress" section
2. Extract Stated Scope
From the governing document, extract:
- What was planned to be built/changed
- What was explicitly out of scope (if stated)
- Expected outcomes at ship
3. Compare Against Current Work
git diff --stat + read changed files. For each change:
- In scope — directly serves the stated plan
- Adjacent — related but not stated (potential creep)
- Out of scope — unrelated to current work
4. Assess Creep Risk
- Count adjacent + out-of-scope changes
- Estimate effort consumed on non-scope work
- Flag if the ratio exceeds 20% (heuristic — adjust per context)
5. Output
## Scope Check: [governing document name]
### In Scope
- [change 1] ✓
- [change 2] ✓
### Adjacent (potential creep)
- [change 3] ⚠ — related but not in plan
### Out of Scope
- [change 4] ✗ — not related to current work
### Verdict
CLEAN — all work is in scope
or
DRIFT — [N] changes outside scope, [estimate] effort diverted6. If Drift Detected
Propose to designer:
- Park out-of-scope work in
live_test_notes.top_of_mind_YYYY-MM-DD - Or expand scope (with explicit acknowledgment)
- Or revert and refocus
Project Paths
- Specs:
docs/specs/ - Plans:
docs/plans/ - Workstreams:
production/workstreams/
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

