tech-transfer
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
科技成果商业转化——TRL×CRL 双轴定位(MatMax)、五化漏斗、三筛决策(Will-B-P)、科学家创业三阶段、国资双轨制。MUST BE USED 当项目涉及高校/科研院所成果转化、教授创业、职务发明、转化模式评估时。
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- audit-xlsSkill
- damodaran-valuationSkill
- dd-checklistSkill
- deal-screeningSkill
- growth-tech-stocksSkill
- hardtech-waveSkill
- ic-memoSkill
- my-pe-viewSkill
- next-windfallSkill
- patent-quality-assessmentSkill
- pe-dd-handbookSkill
- physics-feasibility-checkSkill
- poor-charlie-almanackSkill
- portfolio-monitoringSkill
- serenity-investingSkill
- shou-zhengSkill
- unit-economicsSkill
- value-creation-planSkill
- value-investing-3Skill
- venture-dealsSkill
- verifier-methodSkill
The file
Files
科技成果商业转化 · 操作框架
来源:《科技成果商业转化的探索与实践》(清华五道口技术转移硕士项目)+ 核心思维模型卡(房炫伯),2026-08-18 精读 3 单元。与 poor-charlie-almanack(道)+ shou-zheng(术)联动——本文档补"从实验室到公司"的转化路径层。
核心框架
① MatMax 双轴定位(1.15-1.17)
TRL 11 级(基本原理→概念→验证→早期原型→实验室原型→试运行原型→商业化前示范→首次商业化→相关环境商业化→规模化整合→稳定) CRL 9 级(基本假设→市场分析→验证市场假设→验证解决方案→产品市场匹配→销售准备→首次销售3-5客户→大规模销售有利润→商业模式完整验证)
- 两轴不同步:TRL高CRL低=技术过剩商业化不足(找CEO搭销售);TRL低CRL高=市场ready技术不成熟
- 标定=证据映射+空格标记("不知道"是合法答案但要变成尽调任务)
② 五化漏斗(模型二)
现象理论化→理论样品化→样品产品化→产品商品化→商品产业化
- 样品产品化是最常见的死亡谷
- 前一阶段未达标不得进入下一阶段(Go/No-Go 检查点)
③ 三筛决策 Will-B-P(模型三)
Will Power(转化意愿)× Barrier(技术壁垒)× Problem(产业问题)三项各 1-5 分,相乘 ≥60 进入转化
- Will Power 最易被忽视但最关键(诺奖成果但学者无意愿=失败)
- Barrier 需行业专家评估非仅专利检索;Problem 必须接触真实用户
④ 科学家创业三阶段(2.9)
早期(产品定义+团队组建+激励体系)→ 成长(自我造血+微调不多元化)→ 成熟(现金流+口碑+竞争优势+忠诚团队)
- "依赖外部输血=体量大一点的巨婴"
- 任正非:"钱分好了,管理的一大半问题就解决了"
- 跨阶段跳跃是失败主因;最大陷阱=技术自恋
⑤ 国资双轨制(模型五 + 清华制度附录)
- 核心原则:"尽量不做技术转让,不让所有权转移"
- 路径:许可先行→吸引投资→作价入股
- 三种方式:自主实施 / 作价投资 / 技术许可
- 处置流程(清华样板):申报→评估→定价→第三方评估→审批(<800万领导小组/≥800万党委常委会)→公示≥15日
- 收益分配:学校15%+三方协商
章节目录(chapters/)
| 章节 | 内容 |
| ch01 | 概论:创造性破坏/利基市场五特征/转化难四因 |
| ch02 | 案例:中物院化材所自循环 + 锂电池小股权合作 + 专利组合策略 |
| ch03 | 科学家三阶段 + 天府兴隆湖实验室 + 清华制度 |
使用提示
- 郑宗良项目画像:TRL4-6×CRL1-3 / 早期阶段 / 转化模式未定(尽调第一优先)
- 与 vault 概念页联动
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

