agentleFS
Nomanriaz786Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-team/skills/discovery-synthesis/SKILL.md

discovery-synthesis

Skill1 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Synthesises discovery evidence when raw notes must support qualification, scoping and follow-up.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use after calls, interviews or workshops before recommending an engagement path.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Does not hide contradictory evidence

    line 31

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Discovery Synthesis

When to use it

Use after calls, interviews or workshops before recommending an engagement path.

What Claude needs

  • client-context.md for business background
  • Notes, transcripts or workshop outputs
  • Original hypotheses and meeting objectives
  • Any supplied documents or measures

Method

  1. Normalise notes into facts, statements, interpretations, decisions and actions.
  2. Cluster evidence by trigger, problem, impact, stakeholders, constraints and desired outcomes.
  3. Compare the evidence with original hypotheses and mark supported, weakened or unresolved.
  4. Identify contradictions, missing voices and claims requiring verification.
  5. Draft a concise situation-complication-question narrative.
  6. Recommend the next decision and the minimum evidence needed to make it.

Output format

Provide an evidence digest, hypothesis table, contradictions, open questions, agreed actions and situation-complication-question summary.

Quality checks

  • Preserves attribution for material claims
  • Separates interpretation from client-stated facts
  • Does not hide contradictory evidence

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.