agentleFS
Nomanriaz786Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-team/skills/dashboard-requirements-planner/SKILL.md

dashboard-requirements-planner

Skill1 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Defines decision-led dashboard requirements when users need a clear brief before design and build begin.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use before dashboard design to prevent a collection of charts that lacks ownership or decision value.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Create a wireframe brief, validation plan and phased delivery scope.

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Every visual element supports a named decision or action.

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Dashboard Requirements Planner

When to use it

Use before dashboard design to prevent a collection of charts that lacks ownership or decision value.

What Claude needs

  • client-context.md for business background
  • Named users, decisions and meeting cadence
  • Candidate metrics and current reports
  • Data availability, access rules and refresh constraints

Method

  1. Interview user groups around decisions, triggers, questions and required actions.
  2. Convert needs into user stories with measurable acceptance criteria.
  3. Prioritise metrics using decision value, actionability and data readiness.
  4. Define views, filters, drill paths, alerts and comparison baselines.
  5. Map every element to a governed definition, source and refresh schedule.
  6. Create a wireframe brief, validation plan and phased delivery scope.

Output format

Deliver a requirements table with user, decision, question, metric, view, source, cadence and acceptance test. Add page-level wireframe notes and scope boundaries.

Quality checks

  • Every visual element supports a named decision or action.
  • Metric definitions and source readiness are confirmed.
  • Accessibility, permissions and small-screen needs are addressed.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.