agentleFS
Sign inStart free
Nomanriaz786Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-team/skills/competitor-mapper/SKILL.md

competitor-mapper

Skill1 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub

Maps direct, indirect and emerging competitors when positioning or market entry choices require comparative evidence.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when the business needs to understand alternatives customers consider and the bases of competition.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Test conclusions against customer evidence and source recency.

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Create a competitor matrix, 2x2 map, profiles of priority rivals, whitespace findings and monitoring signals.

    line 26

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Competitor Mapper

When to use it

Use when the business needs to understand alternatives customers consider and the bases of competition.

What Claude needs

  • Offering and customer context from client-context.md
  • Market and geographic boundaries
  • Known competitors and substitutes
  • Comparison criteria and source material

Method

  1. Define the customer decision and identify direct, indirect and do-nothing alternatives.
  2. Build a competitor universe using consistent inclusion criteria.
  3. Compare target segments, propositions, capabilities, routes to market and business models.
  4. Plot competitors on a decision-relevant 2x2 matrix and explain axis choices.
  5. Identify clusters, table stakes, differentiators and credible whitespace.
  6. Test conclusions against customer evidence and source recency.

Output format

Create a competitor matrix, 2x2 map, profiles of priority rivals, whitespace findings and monitoring signals.

Quality checks

  • Comparisons use the same definitions and evidence period
  • Substitutes and the do-nothing option are included
  • Whitespace is linked to customer value, not novelty alone

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free