upsell-sequence-writer
Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate post-purchase email upsell sequences (3-5 emails) that ascend customers from initial purchase to higher-ticket offers using RMBC-structured persuasion.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skillsedited, first seen Mar 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skills★ 441% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- broadcast-emailSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions.
- Distinctive: line 55
Emails 1-2: No selling. Pure value delivery.
- Distinctive: line 62
Read all emails in order. Check:
- Distinctive: line 114
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Distinctive: line 115
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 117
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Very specific: line 122
Run /mechanism-ideation for the upsell product's mechanism
- Very specific: line 123
Run /upsell-script for the immediate post-purchase OTO page (before this sequence)
- Very specific: line 124
Run /email-promo for standalone promotional emails outside a sequence
- Very specific: line 125
Run /hook-battery for subject line inspiration
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
upsell-sequence-writer
Purpose
Generate a post-purchase email sequence (3-5 emails) that ascends customers from their initial purchase to a higher-ticket complementary offer. These emails deploy after the buyer has already said yes — trust is established, the product is in hand (or arriving), and the window for ascension is open. Each email must deliver genuine value before bridging to the upsell. The sequence arc moves from gratitude through value delivery to the offer, with urgency closing the window. Every email uses RMBC principles compressed into short-form format.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
initial_product | Yes | What the customer already purchased — name, price, core promise |
upsell_product | Yes | The higher-ticket offer — name, price, what it does, how it complements the initial purchase |
upsell_price | Yes | Price of the upsell with any discount framing |
target_audience | Yes | Who the buyer is — demographics, pain points, desires, sophistication level |
sequence_length | No | Number of emails: 3, 4, or 5 (default: 5) |
key_mechanism | No | The upsell product's unique mechanism (output from /mechanism-ideation) |
send_timing | No | Days between emails (default: Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Upsell sequences deploy RMBC across multiple touchpoints — Research informs the value content, Mechanism justifies the upsell, Brief structures the sequence arc, Copy executes each email.
Step 2 — Define the Sequence Arc
Map the emotional journey across the sequence:
| Role | Emotional State | RMBC Focus | |
| 1 — Thank You | Validate purchase, deliver quick win | Excited, hopeful | Research (reinforce their decision) |
| 2 — Value Delivery | Teach something useful related to their purchase | Engaged, learning | Research → Mechanism tease |
| 3 — Bridge | Connect initial product's limitation to upsell need | Curious, aware of gap | Mechanism reveal |
| 4 — Offer | Present the upsell with full value stack | Desire, trust | Brief → Copy (full pitch) |
| 5 — Urgency Close | Final window, scarcity, guarantee restatement | Fear of missing out | Copy (close) |
For 3-email sequences: combine emails 1+2, 3+4, and keep 5. For 4-email sequences: combine emails 1+2 and keep 3, 4, 5.
Step 3 — Write Each Email
For each email, produce:
- Subject line (under 50 characters, mobile-optimized)
- Preview text (40-90 characters, complements subject)
- Body copy following the email's role from the arc
- CTA appropriate to the email's position (soft early, hard late)
Rules per email position:
- Emails 1-2: No selling. Pure value delivery. Build goodwill.
- Email 3: Bridge only. Reveal the gap, tease the solution. Soft CTA at most.
- Email 4: Full offer with mechanism, value stack, price anchoring, guarantee.
- Email 5: Urgency, deadline, guarantee restatement, final CTA. Short and direct.
Step 4 — Validate Sequence Coherence
Read all emails in order. Check:
- Does each email build on the previous? No redundant points.
- Does the value-to-pitch ratio feel earned? (At least 2 value emails before the offer)
- Does the urgency in the final email feel real? (Deadline, limited quantity, or price increase)
- Could a reader skip to email 4 and still understand the offer? (It must standalone too)
Output Format
## Upsell Sequence: [Initial Product] → [Upsell Product]
**Sequence Length:** [3-5] emails
**Send Schedule:** [Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, ...]
**Audience:** [target audience summary]
---
### Email 1: [Role Label] — Day [X]
**Subject:** [subject line]
**Preview:** [preview text]
[Full email body]
[CTA or sign-off appropriate to position]
---
### Email 2: [Role Label] — Day [X]
[...continue for each email...]
---
## Sequence Strategy Notes
- **Value-to-pitch ratio:** [X value emails : Y pitch emails]
- **Mechanism reveal timing:** Email [X] — [why this timing]
- **Urgency type:** [deadline | limited quantity | price increase | bonus expiration]
- **Standalone test:** Email [4] works as a standalone pitch: [yes/no + why]Quality Criteria
- First 1-2 emails must deliver genuine value — no selling, no "by the way" pitches
- Each email must have a clear single purpose aligned to its arc position
- Subject lines must be under 50 characters and work on mobile
- The bridge email (3) must make the upsell feel like a logical next step, not a random offer
- Offer email (4) must work as a standalone pitch if read in isolation
- Urgency in final email must be real — name the specific deadline, quantity, or trigger
- Sequence must feel like a relationship, not a drip campaign of pitches
- Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
Related Skills
- Run
/mechanism-ideationfor the upsell product's mechanism - Run
/upsell-scriptfor the immediate post-purchase OTO page (before this sequence) - Run
/email-promofor standalone promotional emails outside a sequence - Run
/hook-batteryfor subject line inspiration - Validate with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

