upsell-sequence-writer
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate post-purchase email upsell sequences (3-5 emails) that ascend customers from initial purchase to higher-ticket offers using RMBC-structured persuasion.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbcedited, first seen Mar 17, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc★ 3294% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- broadcast-emailSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- rmbc-upgradeSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
- write-copySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
24 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 40
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
- Distinctive: line 52
If "Yes, open the video":
- Distinctive: line 59
If "Skip — let's go":
- Very specific: line 67
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
- Distinctive: line 77
If "Yes, that's fine":
- Distinctive: line 83
If "No, turn it off":
- Very specific: line 113
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions.
- Distinctive: line 159
Emails 1-2: No selling. Pure value delivery.
- Distinctive: line 166
Read all emails in order. Check:
- Distinctive: line 218
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Distinctive: line 219
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 221
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Distinctive: line 225
Front-end protection (RMBC 2): No email may imply the front-end product is insufficient.
- Very specific: line 230
Run /mechanism-ideation for the upsell product's mechanism
- Very specific: line 231
Run /upsell-script for the immediate post-purchase OTO page (before this sequence)
- Very specific: line 232
Run /email-promo for standalone promotional emails outside a sequence
- Very specific: line 233
Run /hook-battery for subject line inspiration
- Very specific: line 238
Read lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT).
- Distinctive: line 250
Always deliver the full framework implementation.
- Very specific: line 260
When done, report: STATUS: COMPLETE | NEEDS_RESEARCH | NEEDS_MECHANISM | BLOCKED — RECOMMENDATION: [next skill/action].
- Very specific: line 264
If PHASES shows missing upstream work (R=no, M=no, or B=no), warn briefly and offer to run the prerequisite (/ingredient-research, …
- Distinctive: line 268
If you discover a result contradicting conventional DR copywriting wisdom, log it:
- Distinctive: line 272
Only log genuine surprises — not every result.
- Distinctive: line 287
If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly --><!-- Regenerate: bash bin/gen-skills -->Preamble (run first)
_RMBC_ROOT=""
[ -d "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../bin" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$(cd "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../.." && pwd)"
[ -z "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && for _D in "$HOME/.claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills" ".claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills"; do [ -f "$_D/VERSION" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$_D" && break; done
_UPD=""
[ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && _UPD=$("$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-update-check" 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
_INTRO_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "INTRO_SEEN: $_INTRO_SEEN"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_ACTIVE_PRODUCT=$(grep '^active_product:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^active_product:[[:space:]]*//' | sed 's/^"//;s/"$//' || true)
_WORKSPACE=""; [ -n "$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT" ] && _WORKSPACE="$HOME/.rmbc-skills/products/$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT"
echo "ACTIVE_PRODUCT: ${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}"
if [ -n "$_WORKSPACE" ] && [ -d "$_WORKSPACE" ]; then
_R_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/research.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_M_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/mechanism.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_B_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/brief.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "PHASES: R=$_R_DONE M=$_M_DONE B=$_B_DONE"
fi
_ANALYTICS=$(grep '^analytics_enabled:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^analytics_enabled:[[:space:]]*//' || echo "true")
[ "$_ANALYTICS" = "true" ] && [ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && timeout 2 "$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-analytics" log --skill "upsell-sequence-writer" --product "${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}" --tier 4 2>/dev/null &
_SESSION_COUNT=$(ls /tmp/rmbc-session-* 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' '); touch "/tmp/rmbc-session-$$"
echo "SESSIONS: $_SESSION_COUNT"If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read skills/rmbc-upgrade/SKILL.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT) and follow the "Inline upgrade flow". If JUST_UPGRADED <old> <new>: read $_RMBC_ROOT/CHANGELOG.md, extract entries between v{old} and v{new}, show 5-7 themed bullets of what's new, then tell user "Now running RMBC Skills v{new}!" and continue.
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
Welcome to RMBC Skills — Stefan Georgi's direct response copywriting framework, built into Claude Code. 44 skills covering hooks, ads, emails, landing pages, VSL scripts, and more.
Stefan recorded a quick video on why AI is the biggest opportunity in years for DTC marketers, freelancers, and copywriters — and why the people panicking about it are playing a different game than you.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Want to watch Stefan's take on why this is the best time to be in DTC? (~5 min)"
- Options:
- "Sure, open it"
- "Maybe later — let's write some copy"
If "Yes, open the video":
open "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI8tNfefH1M"
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seenIf "Skip — let's go":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seenContinue with this skill immediately.
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
Help make RMBC Skills better! Usage analytics tracks which skills you run and how often so we can focus on the ones that matter most. Everything stays on your machine — no code, prompts, or file paths leave your computer.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Cool with anonymous usage analytics? You can change this anytime."
- Options:
- "Sure, happy to help" — keep analytics on and mark as prompted
- "No thanks" — disable analytics and mark as prompted
If "Yes, that's fine":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-promptedIf "No, turn it off":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted
sed -i '' 's/^analytics_enabled:.*/analytics_enabled: false/' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null || trueContinue with this skill.
upsell-sequence-writer
Purpose
Generate a post-purchase email sequence (3-5 emails) that ascends customers from their initial purchase to a higher-ticket complementary offer. These emails deploy after the buyer has already said yes — trust is established, the product is in hand (or arriving), and the window for ascension is open. Each email must deliver genuine value before bridging to the upsell. The sequence arc moves from gratitude through value delivery to the offer, with urgency closing the window. Every email uses RMBC principles compressed into short-form format.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
initial_product | Yes | What the customer already purchased — name, price, core promise |
upsell_product | Yes | The higher-ticket offer — name, price, what it does, how it complements the initial purchase |
upsell_price | Yes | Price of the upsell with any discount framing |
target_audience | Yes | Who the buyer is — demographics, pain points, desires, sophistication level |
sequence_length | No | Number of emails: 3, 4, or 5 (default: 5) |
key_mechanism | No | The upsell product's unique mechanism (output from /mechanism-ideation) |
send_timing | No | Days between emails (default: Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Upsell sequences deploy RMBC across multiple touchpoints — Research informs the value content, Mechanism justifies the upsell, Brief structures the sequence arc, Copy executes each email.
Step 2 — Define the Sequence Arc
Map the emotional journey across the sequence:
| Role | Emotional State | RMBC Focus | |
| 1 — Thank You | Validate purchase, deliver quick win | Excited, hopeful | Research (reinforce their decision) |
| 2 — Value Delivery | Teach something useful related to their purchase | Engaged, learning | Research → Mechanism tease |
| 3 — Bridge | Connect initial product's limitation to upsell need | Curious, aware of gap | Mechanism reveal |
| 4 — Offer | Present the upsell with full value stack | Desire, trust | Brief → Copy (full pitch) |
| 5 — Urgency Close | Final window, scarcity, guarantee restatement | Fear of missing out | Copy (close) |
For 4-email sequences: combine emails 1+2 and keep 3, 4, 5.
Step 2b — Map Emails to Upsell Categories (RMBC 2)
Minimum 4 emails. Each mapped to a distinct category with matched CTAs:
| Category | Hook | CTA Style | |
| 1 | Reaffirmation | Celebrate purchase, reinforce mechanism | No upsell CTA |
| 2 | More of Same | "Here's how to accelerate your results" | "Lock in faster progress" |
| 3 | New Problem | "There's something else you should know..." | "Claim your protection" |
| 4 | Expanded Problem | "What happens if you don't follow through?" | "Complete your transformation" |
For 5-email sequences: add urgency email ("Claim your supply before [deadline]").
Step 2c — Doubt-Insertion Technique (RMBC 2)
In emails 2-4+, after painting the dream: (1) insert a specific doubt/threat, (2) resolve with CTA. The doubt must reference actual risks or data — not generic FUD.
Step 2d — Front-End Product Protection (RMBC 2)
HARD RULE: The front-end product is NEVER the problem. Upsell solves external threats only. No generic "Buy Now" CTAs — action-benefit language required.
Step 3 — Write Each Email
For each email, produce:
- Subject line (under 50 characters, mobile-optimized)
- Preview text (40-90 characters, complements subject)
- Body copy following the email's role from the arc
- CTA appropriate to the email's position (soft early, hard late)
Rules per email position:
- Emails 1-2: No selling. Pure value delivery. Build goodwill.
- Email 3: Bridge only. Reveal the gap, tease the solution. Soft CTA at most.
- Email 4: Full offer with mechanism, value stack, price anchoring, guarantee.
- Email 5: Urgency, deadline, guarantee restatement, final CTA. Short and direct.
Step 4 — Validate Sequence Coherence
Read all emails in order. Check:
- Does each email build on the previous? No redundant points.
- Does the value-to-pitch ratio feel earned? (At least 2 value emails before the offer)
- Does the urgency in the final email feel real? (Deadline, limited quantity, or price increase)
- Could a reader skip to email 4 and still understand the offer? (It must standalone too)
Output Format
## Upsell Sequence: [Initial Product] → [Upsell Product]
**Sequence Length:** [3-5] emails
**Send Schedule:** [Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, ...]
**Audience:** [target audience summary]
---
### Email 1: [Role Label] — Day [X]
**Subject:** [subject line]
**Preview:** [preview text]
[Full email body]
[CTA or sign-off appropriate to position]
---
### Email 2: [Role Label] — Day [X]
[...continue for each email...]
---
## Sequence Strategy Notes
- **Value-to-pitch ratio:** [X value emails : Y pitch emails]
- **Mechanism reveal timing:** Email [X] — [why this timing]
- **Urgency type:** [deadline | limited quantity | price increase | bonus expiration]
- **Standalone test:** Email [4] works as a standalone pitch: [yes/no + why]Quality Criteria
- First 1-2 emails must deliver genuine value — no selling, no "by the way" pitches
- Each email must have a clear single purpose aligned to its arc position
- Subject lines must be under 50 characters and work on mobile
- The bridge email (3) must make the upsell feel like a logical next step, not a random offer
- Offer email (4) must work as a standalone pitch if read in isolation
- Urgency in final email must be real — name the specific deadline, quantity, or trigger
- Sequence must feel like a relationship, not a drip campaign of pitches
- Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
- Minimum 4 emails (RMBC 2): Each mapped to a distinct upsell category. Fewer than 4 or duplicate categories = fail.
- Doubt-insertion (RMBC 2): Emails 2-4+ must contain a specific doubt/threat between dream-painting and CTA. Generic fear fails.
- Front-end protection (RMBC 2): No email may imply the front-end product is insufficient. Upsell solves external threats only.
- Action-benefit CTAs (RMBC 2): Category-matched action-benefit language required. Generic CTAs = fail.
Related Skills
- Run
/mechanism-ideationfor the upsell product's mechanism - Run
/upsell-scriptfor the immediate post-purchase OTO page (before this sequence) - Run
/email-promofor standalone promotional emails outside a sequence - Run
/hook-batteryfor subject line inspiration - Validate with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Read lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT). Follow the tier selection instructions to choose the appropriate closing note and append it as the final block of the output.
What's Next?
Based on what you just generated, consider running:
/upsell-script— refine individual upsell offers/email-retention-sequences— build retention after upsell/post-purchase-sequence— align with post-purchase flow
RMBC Completeness
Always deliver the full framework implementation. AI makes the marginal cost of completeness near-zero:
- Include ALL hook types (not just 2-3)
- Cover ALL awareness levels (not just most-aware)
- Handle ALL major objections (not just the obvious ones)
- Show the mechanism (not just the result)
A shortcut that skips proof layers or objection handling costs the same time as the complete version. Always deliver complete.
Completion Protocol
When done, report: STATUS: COMPLETE | NEEDS_RESEARCH | NEEDS_MECHANISM | BLOCKED — RECOMMENDATION: [next skill/action]. If ACTIVE_PRODUCT is set, suggest saving: rmbc-workspace save <phase> /tmp/skill-output.md
Prerequisite Detection
If PHASES shows missing upstream work (R=no, M=no, or B=no), warn briefly and offer to run the prerequisite (/ingredient-research, /mechanism-ideation, or /creative-brief). Present "[Run prerequisite] [Skip — generate anyway]" via AskUserQuestion. Never block.
Eureka Logging
If you discover a result contradicting conventional DR copywriting wisdom, log it:
"$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-analytics" eureka log '{"skill":"upsell-sequence-writer","product":"PRODUCT","insight":"DESCRIPTION","conventional":"WHAT_WAS_EXPECTED","evidence":"WHAT_WAS_OBSERVED"}'Only log genuine surprises — not every result.
Sequence Coherence Check
Before delivering, verify:
- Tone consistency across all emails (no jarring shifts)
- Escalation arc (urgency/value builds across sequence)
- CTA progression (soft → medium → hard across emails)
- No repeated hooks/angles between emails
- Each email can stand alone (reader may skip earlier ones)
After delivering output, if ACTIVE_PRODUCT is none: use AskUserQuestion to ask "What product or offer are you writing for? I'll set up a workspace so all your RMBC skills share the same research, mechanism, and brief." with a freeform text input. When the user answers, run:
/bin/rmbc-workspace active "<user's answer>"If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

