broadcast-email
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate one-off broadcast emails for list engagement — content, story, controversy, case study, or flash promo types with 3 subject line options using RMBC principles.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbcedited, first seen Mar 17, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc★ 3289% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- rmbc-upgradeSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- upsell-sequence-writerSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
- write-copySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
24 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
- Distinctive: line 44
If "Yes, open the video":
- Distinctive: line 51
If "Skip — let's go":
- Very specific: line 59
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
- Distinctive: line 69
If "Yes, that's fine":
- Distinctive: line 75
If "No, turn it off":
- Very specific: line 103
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions.
- Distinctive: line 133
No ALL CAPS words or spam triggers
- Distinctive: line 144
Must work as a standalone teaser in mobile inbox
- Distinctive: line 192
Ask 3 "How much is [outcome] worth?" questions anchored at high amounts ($500, $2,000, $5,000)
- Distinctive: line 193
Follow with: "I have good news — nowhere near that price."
- Distinctive: line 200
Every 3-4 paragraphs must include at least one: mechanism reference, testimonial snippet, testable proof point (number/timeframe), or …
- Distinctive: line 264
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Distinctive: line 265
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 267
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Distinctive: line 271
RMBC 2 big idea: Every email must have a single identifiable big idea that the subject line teases -- if the big idea cannot be stated in …
- Distinctive: line 272
RMBC 2 persuasion density: No 4-paragraph stretch without at least one persuasion marker (mechanism, proof, testimonial, or future-pacing)
- Very specific: line 276
Run /hook-battery for subject line inspiration
- Very specific: line 277
Run /mechanism-ideation for unique angles in content and controversy emails
- Very specific: line 278
Run /email-promo for more structured promotional emails
- Very specific: line 279
Run /soap-opera-sequence to expand a strong story broadcast into a full sequence
- Very specific: line 284
Read lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT).
- Distinctive: line 296
Always deliver the full framework implementation.
- Distinctive: line 308
If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly --><!-- Regenerate: bash bin/gen-skills -->Preamble (run first)
_RMBC_ROOT=""
[ -d "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../bin" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$(cd "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../.." && pwd)"
[ -z "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && for _D in "$HOME/.claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills" ".claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills"; do [ -f "$_D/VERSION" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$_D" && break; done
_UPD=""
[ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && _UPD=$("$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-update-check" 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
_INTRO_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "INTRO_SEEN: $_INTRO_SEEN"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_ACTIVE_PRODUCT=$(grep '^active_product:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^active_product:[[:space:]]*//' | sed 's/^"//;s/"$//' || true)
_WORKSPACE=""; [ -n "$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT" ] && _WORKSPACE="$HOME/.rmbc-skills/products/$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT"
echo "ACTIVE_PRODUCT: ${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}"
_ANALYTICS=$(grep '^analytics_enabled:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^analytics_enabled:[[:space:]]*//' || echo "true")
[ "$_ANALYTICS" = "true" ] && [ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && timeout 2 "$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-analytics" log --skill "broadcast-email" --product "${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}" --tier 2 2>/dev/null &If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read skills/rmbc-upgrade/SKILL.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT) and follow the "Inline upgrade flow". If JUST_UPGRADED <old> <new>: read $_RMBC_ROOT/CHANGELOG.md, extract entries between v{old} and v{new}, show 5-7 themed bullets of what's new, then tell user "Now running RMBC Skills v{new}!" and continue.
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
Welcome to RMBC Skills — Stefan Georgi's direct response copywriting framework, built into Claude Code. 44 skills covering hooks, ads, emails, landing pages, VSL scripts, and more.
Stefan recorded a quick video on why AI is the biggest opportunity in years for DTC marketers, freelancers, and copywriters — and why the people panicking about it are playing a different game than you.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Want to watch Stefan's take on why this is the best time to be in DTC? (~5 min)"
- Options:
- "Sure, open it"
- "Maybe later — let's write some copy"
If "Yes, open the video":
open "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI8tNfefH1M"
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seenIf "Skip — let's go":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seenContinue with this skill immediately.
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
Help make RMBC Skills better! Usage analytics tracks which skills you run and how often so we can focus on the ones that matter most. Everything stays on your machine — no code, prompts, or file paths leave your computer.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Cool with anonymous usage analytics? You can change this anytime."
- Options:
- "Sure, happy to help" — keep analytics on and mark as prompted
- "No thanks" — disable analytics and mark as prompted
If "Yes, that's fine":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-promptedIf "No, turn it off":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted
sed -i '' 's/^analytics_enabled:.*/analytics_enabled: false/' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null || trueContinue with this skill.
broadcast-email
Purpose
Generate standalone broadcast emails for ongoing list engagement. Unlike sequences, broadcasts are one-off sends that keep the list warm, build authority, and drive revenue between automated flows. Each broadcast type serves a different strategic purpose — content emails build trust, story emails build connection, controversy emails drive engagement, case studies build proof, and flash promos drive immediate revenue. This skill produces complete email copy with 3 subject line variants, preview text, body, CTA, and PS line.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
email_type | Yes | One of: content, story, controversy, case_study, flash_promo |
topic | Yes | The specific topic, story, hot take, case study, or promotion |
target_audience | Yes | Who the reader is — demographics, pain points, desires |
product_mention | No | Product to reference or link to (omit for pure engagement emails) |
brand_voice | No | One of: founder, expert, friend, provocateur (default: founder) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Broadcasts deploy RMBC in single-email format — Research drives topic relevance, Mechanism adds unique insight, Brief selects the angle, Copy executes with clarity and impact.
Step 2 — Select Structure by Type
| Type | Structure | Tone | Length | CTA Style |
| Content | Teach one thing → actionable takeaway → optional product bridge | Educational, generous | 400-600 words | Soft: "Try this today" or link to resource |
| Story | Scene → tension → resolution → lesson → bridge | Conversational, personal | 350-500 words | Soft: reply, share, or subtle product link |
| Controversy | Hot take → evidence → "here's what most people get wrong" → reframe | Bold, direct, opinionated | 300-500 words | Engagement: "Reply and tell me if I'm wrong" |
| Case Study | Situation → challenge → what they did → results → lesson | Proof-driven, specific | 400-600 words | Medium: "Want similar results? Here's how" |
| Flash Promo | Offer → reason why now → proof → scarcity → CTA | Urgent, direct | 200-350 words | Hard: "Buy now before midnight" |
Step 3 — Big Idea Check
Identify the single most fascinating, contrarian, or surprising angle. State it in one sentence. If the topic lacks a big idea, prompt the user: "What is the single most surprising thing about [topic]?" The subject line and opening hook must tease this big idea — never bury it. Flat copy always loses to copy with one fascinating idea.
Step 4 — Write Subject Lines (10+ Variants)
Generate a minimum of 10 subject line variants, categorized by hook type:
| Hook Type | Minimum Count | Example Pattern |
| Curiosity | 3+ | Open a loop the reader must close |
| Contrarian | 2+ | Challenge a common belief or practice |
| Story-based | 2+ | Tease a narrative or character |
| Educational | 2+ | Promise a specific insight or framework |
| Urgency | 1+ | Time-bound or scarcity-driven |
Rules:
- Max 50 characters (mobile truncation)
- No ALL CAPS words or spam triggers
- Controversy subject lines should provoke without being offensive
- Flash promo subject lines can include one emoji if appropriate
- Each must work without preview text context
- The top 3 subject lines (recommended for A/B testing) must tease the big idea from Step 3
Step 5 — Write Preview Text
- 40-90 characters
- Complements (not repeats) the subject line
- Extends the curiosity loop or adds a proof point
- Must work as a standalone teaser in mobile inbox
Step 6 — Write Email Body
Structure per type:
Content:
- Hook — why this topic matters right now (1-2 sentences)
- One core insight — teach the idea with a specific example
- Actionable takeaway — what the reader can do today
- Bridge — optional: connect the insight to your product/service
Story:
- Scene-setting — drop the reader into a moment (sensory details)
- Tension — what went wrong or what was at stake
- Resolution — what happened and what it revealed
- Lesson — the universal takeaway
- Bridge — optional: how this connects to what you offer
Controversy:
- Hot take — state the contrarian position clearly in the first line
- Evidence — why most people are wrong about this
- Reframe — the correct way to think about it
- Challenge — invite the reader to disagree or engage
Case Study:
- Context — who the person/company is (relatable to audience)
- Challenge — the specific problem they faced
- Action — what they did (with enough detail to be credible)
- Results — specific, measurable outcomes
- Lesson — what the reader can learn from this
Flash Promo:
- Offer — what it is, what they get, the discount/deal
- Reason why — why this offer exists now (inventory, anniversary, mistake)
- Proof — one strong proof point (testimonial, result, guarantee)
- Scarcity — specific deadline or quantity limit
- CTA — clear, urgent, repeated
Formatting rules:
- Short paragraphs: 1-3 sentences max
- Bold key phrases sparingly (1-2 per email)
- One primary CTA — do not split attention
- PS line: strongest proof point, deadline reminder, or engagement prompt
Step 7 — Add ROI Math (Flash Promo and Case Study)
For emails mentioning price, insert value-comparison anchoring BEFORE the reveal:
- Ask 3 "How much is [outcome] worth?" questions anchored at high amounts ($500, $2,000, $5,000)
- Follow with: "I have good news — nowhere near that price."
- Reveal actual price as dramatically lower
Skip for non-promo types unless a product bridge leads to price.
Step 8 — Enforce Persuasion Density
Every 3-4 paragraphs must include at least one: mechanism reference, testimonial snippet, testable proof point (number/timeframe), or future-pacing statement. If any 4-paragraph stretch lacks a persuasion marker, insert one.
Output Format
## Broadcast Email: [Topic]
**Type:** [content | story | controversy | case_study | flash_promo]
**Voice:** [founder | expert | friend | provocateur]
**Word Count:** ~XXX
---
### Big Idea
[One sentence — the single most fascinating angle]
### Subject Lines (10+ Variants by Hook Type)
| # | Subject Line | Hook Type |
|---|-------------|-----------|
| 1-3 | [curiosity subjects] | Curiosity |
| 4-5 | [contrarian subjects] | Contrarian |
| 6-7 | [story subjects] | Story-based |
| 8-9 | [educational subjects] | Educational |
| 10+ | [urgency subjects] | Urgency |
**Top 3 for A/B testing:** #X, #X, #X
**Preview Text:** [preview text]
---
### Email Body
**From:** [sender name/brand]
[Full email copy]
[CTA]
**PS —** [PS line]
---
## Broadcast Notes
- **Best send day/time for [type]:** [recommendation]
- **Engagement metric to watch:** [open rate | reply rate | click rate | revenue]
- **Follow-up opportunity:** [what to send next based on engagement]Quality Criteria
- Subject lines must be under 50 characters and A/B testable
- Preview text must not repeat the subject line
- Content emails must deliver a genuine, actionable insight — not thinly veiled pitches
- Story emails must include specific sensory details — not generic anecdotes
- Controversy emails must take a real position — not a safe "both sides" hedge
- Case study results must be specific and measurable — not "they saw great results"
- Flash promo urgency must be real — name the deadline, quantity, or trigger
- PS line must work as a standalone selling argument
- Product mentions in non-promo types must feel natural, not forced
- Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
- RMBC 2 ROI math: Any email mentioning price must include value-comparison anchoring BEFORE the price reveal
- RMBC 2 subject diversity: Minimum 10 subject line variants across 5+ hook categories
- RMBC 2 big idea: Every email must have a single identifiable big idea that the subject line teases -- if the big idea cannot be stated in one sentence, the angle is too diffuse
- RMBC 2 persuasion density: No 4-paragraph stretch without at least one persuasion marker (mechanism, proof, testimonial, or future-pacing)
Related Skills
- Run
/hook-batteryfor subject line inspiration - Run
/mechanism-ideationfor unique angles in content and controversy emails - Run
/email-promofor more structured promotional emails - Run
/soap-opera-sequenceto expand a strong story broadcast into a full sequence - Validate with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Read lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT). Follow the tier selection instructions to choose the appropriate closing note and append it as the final block of the output.
What's Next?
Based on what you just generated, consider running:
/email-promo— create promotional variant/copy-rewrite— improve weak sections/rmbc-copy-audit— score output quality
RMBC Completeness
Always deliver the full framework implementation. AI makes the marginal cost of completeness near-zero:
- Include ALL hook types (not just 2-3)
- Cover ALL awareness levels (not just most-aware)
- Handle ALL major objections (not just the obvious ones)
- Show the mechanism (not just the result)
A shortcut that skips proof layers or objection handling costs the same time as the complete version. Always deliver complete.
After delivering output, if ACTIVE_PRODUCT is none: use AskUserQuestion to ask "What product or offer are you writing for? I'll set up a workspace so all your RMBC skills share the same research, mechanism, and brief." with a freeform text input. When the user answers, run:
/bin/rmbc-workspace active "<user's answer>"If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

