agentleFS
coleschaffercoleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/skills/broadcast-email/SKILL.md

broadcast-email

Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate one-off broadcast emails for list engagement — content, story, controversy, case study, or flash promo types with 3 subject line options using RMBC principles.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    No ALL CAPS words or spam triggers

    line 52
  3. Distinctive:

    Must work as a standalone teaser in mobile inbox

    line 62
  4. Distinctive:

    Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"

    line 161
  5. Distinctive:

    Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)

    line 162
  6. Distinctive:

    Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode

    line 164
  7. Very specific:

    Run /hook-battery for subject line inspiration

    line 169
  8. Very specific:

    Run /mechanism-ideation for unique angles in content and controversy emails

    line 170
  9. Very specific:

    Run /email-promo for more structured promotional emails

    line 171
  10. Very specific:

    Run /soap-opera-sequence to expand a strong story broadcast into a full sequence

    line 172

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

broadcast-email

Purpose

Generate standalone broadcast emails for ongoing list engagement. Unlike sequences, broadcasts are one-off sends that keep the list warm, build authority, and drive revenue between automated flows. Each broadcast type serves a different strategic purpose — content emails build trust, story emails build connection, controversy emails drive engagement, case studies build proof, and flash promos drive immediate revenue. This skill produces complete email copy with 3 subject line variants, preview text, body, CTA, and PS line.

Inputs

InputRequiredDescription
email_typeYesOne of: content, story, controversy, case_study, flash_promo
topicYesThe specific topic, story, hot take, case study, or promotion
target_audienceYesWho the reader is — demographics, pain points, desires
product_mentionNoProduct to reference or link to (omit for pure engagement emails)
brand_voiceNoOne of: founder, expert, friend, provocateur (default: founder)

Execution Protocol

Step 1 — Load Framework Context

Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Broadcasts deploy RMBC in single-email format — Research drives topic relevance, Mechanism adds unique insight, Brief selects the angle, Copy executes with clarity and impact.

Step 2 — Select Structure by Type

TypeStructureToneLengthCTA Style
ContentTeach one thing → actionable takeaway → optional product bridgeEducational, generous400-600 wordsSoft: "Try this today" or link to resource
StoryScene → tension → resolution → lesson → bridgeConversational, personal350-500 wordsSoft: reply, share, or subtle product link
ControversyHot take → evidence → "here's what most people get wrong" → reframeBold, direct, opinionated300-500 wordsEngagement: "Reply and tell me if I'm wrong"
Case StudySituation → challenge → what they did → results → lessonProof-driven, specific400-600 wordsMedium: "Want similar results? Here's how"
Flash PromoOffer → reason why now → proof → scarcity → CTAUrgent, direct200-350 wordsHard: "Buy now before midnight"

Step 3 — Write Subject Lines (3 Variants)

Generate 3 subject lines for A/B testing:

VariantStrategyBest For
ACuriosity gapContent, story, case study
BDirect benefit or bold claimControversy, flash promo
CPersonal/conversationalStory, content

Rules:

  • Max 50 characters (mobile truncation)
  • No ALL CAPS words or spam triggers
  • Controversy subject lines should provoke without being offensive
  • Flash promo subject lines can include one emoji if appropriate
  • Each must work without preview text context

Step 4 — Write Preview Text

  • 40-90 characters
  • Complements (not repeats) the subject line
  • Extends the curiosity loop or adds a proof point
  • Must work as a standalone teaser in mobile inbox

Step 5 — Write Email Body

Structure per type:

Content:

  1. Hook — why this topic matters right now (1-2 sentences)
  2. One core insight — teach the idea with a specific example
  3. Actionable takeaway — what the reader can do today
  4. Bridge — optional: connect the insight to your product/service

Story:

  1. Scene-setting — drop the reader into a moment (sensory details)
  2. Tension — what went wrong or what was at stake
  3. Resolution — what happened and what it revealed
  4. Lesson — the universal takeaway
  5. Bridge — optional: how this connects to what you offer

Controversy:

  1. Hot take — state the contrarian position clearly in the first line
  2. Evidence — why most people are wrong about this
  3. Reframe — the correct way to think about it
  4. Challenge — invite the reader to disagree or engage

Case Study:

  1. Context — who the person/company is (relatable to audience)
  2. Challenge — the specific problem they faced
  3. Action — what they did (with enough detail to be credible)
  4. Results — specific, measurable outcomes
  5. Lesson — what the reader can learn from this

Flash Promo:

  1. Offer — what it is, what they get, the discount/deal
  2. Reason why — why this offer exists now (inventory, anniversary, mistake)
  3. Proof — one strong proof point (testimonial, result, guarantee)
  4. Scarcity — specific deadline or quantity limit
  5. CTA — clear, urgent, repeated

Formatting rules:

  • Short paragraphs: 1-3 sentences max
  • Bold key phrases sparingly (1-2 per email)
  • One primary CTA — do not split attention
  • PS line: strongest proof point, deadline reminder, or engagement prompt

Output Format

## Broadcast Email: [Topic]

**Type:** [content | story | controversy | case_study | flash_promo]
**Voice:** [founder | expert | friend | provocateur]
**Word Count:** ~XXX

---

### Subject Lines (A/B Test)

| Variant | Subject Line | Strategy |
|---------|-------------|----------|
| A | [subject] | [strategy] |
| B | [subject] | [strategy] |
| C | [subject] | [strategy] |

**Preview Text:** [preview text]

---

### Email Body

**From:** [sender name/brand]

[Full email copy]

[CTA]

**PS —** [PS line]

---

## Broadcast Notes

- **Best send day/time for [type]:** [recommendation]
- **Engagement metric to watch:** [open rate | reply rate | click rate | revenue]
- **Follow-up opportunity:** [what to send next based on engagement]

Quality Criteria

  • Subject lines must be under 50 characters and A/B testable
  • Preview text must not repeat the subject line
  • Content emails must deliver a genuine, actionable insight — not thinly veiled pitches
  • Story emails must include specific sensory details — not generic anecdotes
  • Controversy emails must take a real position — not a safe "both sides" hedge
  • Case study results must be specific and measurable — not "they saw great results"
  • Flash promo urgency must be real — name the deadline, quantity, or trigger
  • PS line must work as a standalone selling argument
  • Product mentions in non-promo types must feel natural, not forced
  • Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
  • Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
  • Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
  • Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
  • Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)

Related Skills

  • Run /hook-battery for subject line inspiration
  • Run /mechanism-ideation for unique angles in content and controversy emails
  • Run /email-promo for more structured promotional emails
  • Run /soap-opera-sequence to expand a strong story broadcast into a full sequence
  • Validate with /rmbc-copy-audit

Attribution

Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.