broadcast-email
Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate one-off broadcast emails for list engagement — content, story, controversy, case study, or flash promo types with 3 subject line options using RMBC principles.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skillsedited, first seen Mar 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skills★ 445% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- upsell-sequence-writerSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 28
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions.
- Distinctive: line 52
No ALL CAPS words or spam triggers
- Distinctive: line 62
Must work as a standalone teaser in mobile inbox
- Distinctive: line 161
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Distinctive: line 162
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 164
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Very specific: line 169
Run /hook-battery for subject line inspiration
- Very specific: line 170
Run /mechanism-ideation for unique angles in content and controversy emails
- Very specific: line 171
Run /email-promo for more structured promotional emails
- Very specific: line 172
Run /soap-opera-sequence to expand a strong story broadcast into a full sequence
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
broadcast-email
Purpose
Generate standalone broadcast emails for ongoing list engagement. Unlike sequences, broadcasts are one-off sends that keep the list warm, build authority, and drive revenue between automated flows. Each broadcast type serves a different strategic purpose — content emails build trust, story emails build connection, controversy emails drive engagement, case studies build proof, and flash promos drive immediate revenue. This skill produces complete email copy with 3 subject line variants, preview text, body, CTA, and PS line.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
email_type | Yes | One of: content, story, controversy, case_study, flash_promo |
topic | Yes | The specific topic, story, hot take, case study, or promotion |
target_audience | Yes | Who the reader is — demographics, pain points, desires |
product_mention | No | Product to reference or link to (omit for pure engagement emails) |
brand_voice | No | One of: founder, expert, friend, provocateur (default: founder) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Broadcasts deploy RMBC in single-email format — Research drives topic relevance, Mechanism adds unique insight, Brief selects the angle, Copy executes with clarity and impact.
Step 2 — Select Structure by Type
| Type | Structure | Tone | Length | CTA Style |
| Content | Teach one thing → actionable takeaway → optional product bridge | Educational, generous | 400-600 words | Soft: "Try this today" or link to resource |
| Story | Scene → tension → resolution → lesson → bridge | Conversational, personal | 350-500 words | Soft: reply, share, or subtle product link |
| Controversy | Hot take → evidence → "here's what most people get wrong" → reframe | Bold, direct, opinionated | 300-500 words | Engagement: "Reply and tell me if I'm wrong" |
| Case Study | Situation → challenge → what they did → results → lesson | Proof-driven, specific | 400-600 words | Medium: "Want similar results? Here's how" |
| Flash Promo | Offer → reason why now → proof → scarcity → CTA | Urgent, direct | 200-350 words | Hard: "Buy now before midnight" |
Step 3 — Write Subject Lines (3 Variants)
Generate 3 subject lines for A/B testing:
| Variant | Strategy | Best For |
| A | Curiosity gap | Content, story, case study |
| B | Direct benefit or bold claim | Controversy, flash promo |
| C | Personal/conversational | Story, content |
Rules:
- Max 50 characters (mobile truncation)
- No ALL CAPS words or spam triggers
- Controversy subject lines should provoke without being offensive
- Flash promo subject lines can include one emoji if appropriate
- Each must work without preview text context
Step 4 — Write Preview Text
- 40-90 characters
- Complements (not repeats) the subject line
- Extends the curiosity loop or adds a proof point
- Must work as a standalone teaser in mobile inbox
Step 5 — Write Email Body
Structure per type:
Content:
- Hook — why this topic matters right now (1-2 sentences)
- One core insight — teach the idea with a specific example
- Actionable takeaway — what the reader can do today
- Bridge — optional: connect the insight to your product/service
Story:
- Scene-setting — drop the reader into a moment (sensory details)
- Tension — what went wrong or what was at stake
- Resolution — what happened and what it revealed
- Lesson — the universal takeaway
- Bridge — optional: how this connects to what you offer
Controversy:
- Hot take — state the contrarian position clearly in the first line
- Evidence — why most people are wrong about this
- Reframe — the correct way to think about it
- Challenge — invite the reader to disagree or engage
Case Study:
- Context — who the person/company is (relatable to audience)
- Challenge — the specific problem they faced
- Action — what they did (with enough detail to be credible)
- Results — specific, measurable outcomes
- Lesson — what the reader can learn from this
Flash Promo:
- Offer — what it is, what they get, the discount/deal
- Reason why — why this offer exists now (inventory, anniversary, mistake)
- Proof — one strong proof point (testimonial, result, guarantee)
- Scarcity — specific deadline or quantity limit
- CTA — clear, urgent, repeated
Formatting rules:
- Short paragraphs: 1-3 sentences max
- Bold key phrases sparingly (1-2 per email)
- One primary CTA — do not split attention
- PS line: strongest proof point, deadline reminder, or engagement prompt
Output Format
## Broadcast Email: [Topic]
**Type:** [content | story | controversy | case_study | flash_promo]
**Voice:** [founder | expert | friend | provocateur]
**Word Count:** ~XXX
---
### Subject Lines (A/B Test)
| Variant | Subject Line | Strategy |
|---------|-------------|----------|
| A | [subject] | [strategy] |
| B | [subject] | [strategy] |
| C | [subject] | [strategy] |
**Preview Text:** [preview text]
---
### Email Body
**From:** [sender name/brand]
[Full email copy]
[CTA]
**PS —** [PS line]
---
## Broadcast Notes
- **Best send day/time for [type]:** [recommendation]
- **Engagement metric to watch:** [open rate | reply rate | click rate | revenue]
- **Follow-up opportunity:** [what to send next based on engagement]Quality Criteria
- Subject lines must be under 50 characters and A/B testable
- Preview text must not repeat the subject line
- Content emails must deliver a genuine, actionable insight — not thinly veiled pitches
- Story emails must include specific sensory details — not generic anecdotes
- Controversy emails must take a real position — not a safe "both sides" hedge
- Case study results must be specific and measurable — not "they saw great results"
- Flash promo urgency must be real — name the deadline, quantity, or trigger
- PS line must work as a standalone selling argument
- Product mentions in non-promo types must feel natural, not forced
- Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
Related Skills
- Run
/hook-batteryfor subject line inspiration - Run
/mechanism-ideationfor unique angles in content and controversy emails - Run
/email-promofor more structured promotional emails - Run
/soap-opera-sequenceto expand a strong story broadcast into a full sequence - Validate with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

