agentleFS
coleschaffercoleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/skills/scarcity-urgency/SKILL.md

scarcity-urgency

Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate ethical scarcity and urgency elements for DTC offers — genuine limited stock, time-limited pricing, bonus deadlines, seasonal relevance, and enrollment caps with copy, visual treatment, and ethical justification.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before writing any copy, verify the scarcity is genuine:

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    If the scarcity type is borderline or the user has no genuine scarcity, recommend these ethical alternatives:

    line 73
  3. Distinctive:

    Every scarcity claim must pass the ethical validation — no fabricated urgency, ever

    line 152
  4. Distinctive:

    If scarcity cannot be verified as genuine, the skill must say so explicitly and offer alternatives

    line 153
  5. Distinctive:

    Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"

    line 160
  6. Distinctive:

    Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)

    line 161
  7. Distinctive:

    Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode

    line 163
  8. Very specific:

    Run /order-form-cro to integrate scarcity elements into checkout pages

    line 168
  9. Very specific:

    Run /lander-copy to weave urgency into the full sales page

    line 169
  10. Very specific:

    Run /offer-stack to ensure the offer itself justifies the urgency

    line 170
  11. Very specific:

    Run /pricing-strategy to develop the pricing that scarcity protects

    line 171
  12. Very specific:

    Run /broadcast-email to write deadline-driven promotional emails

    line 172

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

scarcity-urgency

Purpose

Generate ethical scarcity and urgency elements for DTC offers. Scarcity and urgency are the two most powerful conversion accelerators in direct response — and the two most abused. Fake countdown timers, fabricated "only 3 left" claims, and phantom deadlines destroy trust and invite chargebacks. This skill produces scarcity/urgency elements that are genuinely true, ethically defensible, and conversion-effective. Every element includes copy text, visual treatment guidance, and an ethical justification proving the scarcity is real. If the scarcity isn't real, the skill says so and recommends alternatives.

Inputs

InputRequiredDescription
offer_descriptionYesThe product/service, price, and what the prospect gets
scarcity_typeYesOne of: limited_stock, time_limited, bonus_deadline, seasonal, enrollment_cap
deadlineNoSpecific date/time if applicable (e.g., "March 31, 2026 at midnight")
inventory_countNoActual remaining inventory or enrollment slots (must be truthful)
target_audienceYesWho the prospect is — awareness level and sophistication matter for scarcity framing

Execution Protocol

Step 1 — Load Framework Context

Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Scarcity and urgency sit at the CTA layer of RMBC — they answer "why now?" after the mechanism answers "why this?" and proof answers "why believe?" Without a strong mechanism and proof foundation, urgency feels manipulative. With them, urgency feels like helpful information.

Step 2 — Validate the Scarcity Claim

Before writing any copy, verify the scarcity is genuine:

Scarcity TypeGenuine WhenFabricated When
Limited StockPhysical inventory has actual production/supply constraintsDigital product with "only 47 left"
Time-Limited PricingPrice genuinely increases after deadline (and stays increased)Countdown resets on page refresh
Bonus DeadlineBonus is genuinely removed after date (and doesn't come back)Bonus "expires" but is offered again next week
SeasonalOffer tied to real calendar event, season, or market cycle"Summer sale" in February
Enrollment CapGenuine capacity limit — coaching seats, cohort size, bandwidthArtificial cap on a digital course with no interaction

If the scarcity claim cannot be ethically justified, STOP. Output an honest assessment and recommend an alternative urgency approach (see Step 3 alternatives).

Step 3 — Generate Scarcity Elements

For the validated scarcity type, produce three elements at different intensity levels:

Soft (Informational)

  • States the scarcity as a fact without pressure
  • Tone: helpful, matter-of-fact
  • Best for: high-awareness, sophisticated audiences who resist hard sells

Medium (Motivational)

  • States the scarcity with consequence framing — what happens if they miss it
  • Tone: direct, clear stakes
  • Best for: mid-awareness audiences who need a reason to act today vs. "someday"

Strong (Urgent)

  • States the scarcity with specific numbers, countdown, and immediate consequence
  • Tone: time-sensitive, concrete
  • Best for: ready-to-buy prospects who need a final nudge, not more persuasion

For each intensity level, provide:

  1. Headline/Banner Copy — The primary scarcity statement (1 line)
  2. Supporting Copy — Context that makes the scarcity believable (2-3 sentences)
  3. Visual Treatment — How to display it on the page (banner, badge, inline text, countdown)
  4. Placement — Where on the page this element belongs (above fold, near CTA, in cart)
  5. Ethical Justification — Why this claim is truthful and defensible

Step 4 — Recommend Alternatives (If Scarcity Is Weak)

If the scarcity type is borderline or the user has no genuine scarcity, recommend these ethical alternatives:

AlternativeHow It WorksExample
Loss aversion framingFrame the cost of NOT buying (ongoing problem cost)"Every month without this, you're losing $X to..."
Momentum urgencyThe sooner they start, the sooner they see results"Start today, see your first results by [date]"
Social proof velocityShow how many people are buying/joining right now"147 people joined this week" (if true)
Decision fatiguePosition buying as the END of their search, not a new commitment"Stop researching — this is the solution"
Seasonal relevanceConnect to a real upcoming event or season"Get ready before summer" (if it's spring)

Step 5 — Assemble the Scarcity Stack

Combine elements into a recommended page implementation:

  1. Primary placement — The single most impactful scarcity element and where it goes
  2. Reinforcement — A secondary mention that echoes the scarcity without repeating the same copy
  3. CTA integration — How the scarcity language integrates into the call-to-action button and surrounding copy
  4. Email/ad echo — How to reference the same scarcity in ads and emails driving to the page (must match exactly — mismatched urgency kills trust)

Output Format

## Scarcity & Urgency: [Offer Name]

**Scarcity Type:** [type]
**Deadline:** [date/time or "ongoing"]
**Inventory:** [count or "N/A"]
**Ethical Status:** VERIFIED / BORDERLINE / NOT GENUINE

---

### SOFT (Informational)

**Banner:** "[copy]"
**Supporting:** [2-3 sentences]
**Visual:** [treatment]
**Placement:** [location]
**Ethics:** [justification]

---

### MEDIUM (Motivational)

**Banner:** "[copy]"
**Supporting:** [2-3 sentences]
**Visual:** [treatment]
**Placement:** [location]
**Ethics:** [justification]

---

### STRONG (Urgent)

**Banner:** "[copy]"
**Supporting:** [2-3 sentences]
**Visual:** [treatment]
**Placement:** [location]
**Ethics:** [justification]

---

### SCARCITY STACK (Recommended Implementation)

| Element | Location | Copy |
|---------|----------|------|
| Primary | [placement] | [copy] |
| Reinforcement | [placement] | [copy] |
| CTA integration | [button area] | [copy] |
| Email/ad echo | [subject line + preview] | [copy] |

---

### ALTERNATIVES (if applicable)

[Ethical alternatives if primary scarcity is weak]

Quality Criteria

  • Every scarcity claim must pass the ethical validation — no fabricated urgency, ever
  • If scarcity cannot be verified as genuine, the skill must say so explicitly and offer alternatives
  • Three intensity levels must be genuinely different in tone and approach — not the same copy with more exclamation marks
  • Visual treatment must be specific and implementable — "add urgency" is not guidance
  • Placement must account for mobile-first layout — scarcity elements must be visible without scrolling past the CTA
  • CTA integration must feel natural — bolted-on urgency next to a calm CTA creates cognitive dissonance
  • Email/ad scarcity must match page scarcity exactly — mismatched deadlines or claims destroy credibility
  • Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
  • Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
  • Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
  • Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
  • Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)

Related Skills

  • Run /order-form-cro to integrate scarcity elements into checkout pages
  • Run /lander-copy to weave urgency into the full sales page
  • Run /offer-stack to ensure the offer itself justifies the urgency
  • Run /pricing-strategy to develop the pricing that scarcity protects
  • Run /broadcast-email to write deadline-driven promotional emails
  • Validate the full page with /rmbc-copy-audit

Attribution

Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.