free-offer-brief
Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design free lead magnets and tripwire offers that demonstrate RMBC quality — each brief includes offer name, format, hook angle, landing page headline, perceived value, production cost, and email follow-up strategy.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skillsedited, first seen Mar 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skills★ 465% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- broadcast-emailSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- upsell-sequence-writerSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 42
If the chosen type is a poor fit for the product line, flag the mismatch and recommend a better type before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 49
Must be specific and outcome-driven: "The 7-Day Gut Reset Checklist" not "Free Health Guide"
- Distinctive: line 61
Must connect to the paid product's mechanism without giving it all away
- Distinctive: line 175
Specificity gate: Every recommendation must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "high value" or "strong appeal"
- Distinctive: line 176
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 178
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Very specific: line 183
Run /welcome-sequence to expand the 5-email follow-up into a full onboarding sequence
- Very specific: line 184
Run /lander-copy to write the full landing page from the headline directions
- Very specific: line 185
Run /hook-battery to generate additional headline and ad hook variations
- Very specific: line 186
Run /funnel-architecture to see where this free offer fits in the complete funnel
- Very specific: line 187
Run /offer-stack to design the paid offer this free offer leads into
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
free-offer-brief
Purpose
Design free lead magnets and tripwire offers that serve as funnel entry points. The free offer IS the first impression — it must demonstrate the same RMBC quality as paid products. A weak lead magnet trains prospects to ignore you. A strong one builds trust, establishes mechanism credibility, and creates reciprocity that drives paid conversions. This skill outputs a complete brief for each offer type: name, format, hook angle, landing page headline, perceived value framing, production cost estimate, and the email follow-up strategy that converts free leads into buyers.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
product_line | Yes | The paid product(s) this free offer will lead into — name, price, core promise |
target_audience | Yes | Who the prospect is — demographics, pain points, desires, awareness level |
offer_type | Yes | One of: guide, checklist, quiz, free_shipping, trial, sample |
budget_constraint | No | Maximum production/fulfillment cost per lead (default: $0 for digital, specify for physical) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Free offers apply RMBC in miniature — Research identifies what the audience values enough to trade their email for, Mechanism gives the free offer a unique angle that previews the paid product's approach, Brief structures the offer for maximum perceived value, Copy makes the landing page convert.
Step 2 — Assess Offer Type Fit
Evaluate the chosen offer type against the audience and product line:
| Offer Type | Best For | Perceived Value Driver | Fulfillment Cost |
| Guide | Info products, services — audience wants education | Depth of insight, specificity | $0 (digital PDF) |
| Checklist | Action-oriented audiences — want quick wins | Immediate usability, saves time | $0 (digital) |
| Quiz | Broad audiences — curiosity-driven, personalization | Self-knowledge, custom results | $0 (software) |
| Free+Shipping | Physical products — supplements, beauty, gadgets | Tangible product in hand | $3-15 COGS + shipping |
| Trial | Software, subscriptions — need to experience value | Risk-free experience of the real product | Variable (usage cost) |
| Sample | Consumables — supplements, food, skincare | Taste/test before committing to full supply | $2-8 COGS + shipping |
If the chosen type is a poor fit for the product line, flag the mismatch and recommend a better type before proceeding.
Step 3 — Design the Offer
Build the complete offer brief:
Offer Name
- Must be specific and outcome-driven: "The 7-Day Gut Reset Checklist" not "Free Health Guide"
- Include a number, timeframe, or specificity marker
- The name alone should communicate value
Format and Scope
- Define exactly what the prospect receives and in what format
- For digital: page count, sections, bonus elements
- For physical: product specs, quantity, packaging
- Scope rule: solve ONE specific problem completely — never try to cover everything
Hook Angle
- The single most compelling reason to claim this offer NOW
- Must connect to the paid product's mechanism without giving it all away
- The hook should create a curiosity gap that the paid product fills
Landing Page Headline
- 3 headline variations, each using a different RMBC lead pattern:
- Curiosity/mechanism-led
- Outcome/desire-led
- Problem/pain-led
Perceived Value Framing
- What this would cost if sold separately (credible anchor)
- Why it's being offered free (the reason must be believable)
- What makes it genuinely valuable, not just "free content"
Production Cost Estimate
- Itemized: content creation, design, fulfillment, platform/software
- Cost per lead at projected volume (100, 1000, 5000 leads)
- Flag if cost exceeds budget constraint
Step 4 — Map the Email Follow-Up Strategy
The free offer is the beginning, not the end. Define the conversion path:
| Timing | Purpose | Content Direction | |
| Delivery | Immediate | Deliver the offer + set expectations | Here's your [offer] + what to do first |
| Quick Win | Day 1-2 | Help them USE the offer and get a result | One action step from the guide/checklist |
| Mechanism Tease | Day 3-4 | Introduce the paid product's mechanism | "The guide covers X, but here's what it can't do alone..." |
| Social Proof | Day 5-6 | Show results from paid customers | Testimonial + before/after |
| Offer | Day 7 | Present the paid product with a transition incentive | Special pricing for free offer recipients |
Step 5 — Validate the Funnel Bridge
Confirm the free offer creates a logical bridge to the paid product:
- The free offer solves a real problem (not manufactured)
- Consuming the free offer naturally reveals the need for the paid product
- The mechanism preview in the free offer matches the paid product's mechanism
- The email sequence has a clear, non-pushy path from free to paid
- The perceived value justifies giving up an email address
Output Format
## Free Offer Brief: [Offer Name]
**Type:** [guide | checklist | quiz | free_shipping | trial | sample]
**Paid Product Bridge:** [product name + price]
**Target Audience:** [ICP summary]
**Budget Constraint:** [amount or "digital only"]
---
### OFFER DESIGN
**Name:** [specific, outcome-driven name]
**Format:** [what they receive — format, length, delivery method]
**Scope:** [the ONE problem this solves]
**Hook Angle:** [the compelling reason to claim it now]
---
### LANDING PAGE HEADLINES
1. **Curiosity:** "[headline]"
2. **Outcome:** "[headline]"
3. **Pain:** "[headline]"
---
### VALUE FRAMING
- **Perceived value:** $[anchor price] if sold separately
- **Why free:** [believable reason]
- **Genuine value:** [what makes this worth their email]
---
### PRODUCTION COST
| Item | Cost |
|------|------|
| [content/design/fulfillment] | $X |
| **Cost per lead (at 1000 leads):** | $X.XX |
---
### EMAIL FOLLOW-UP SEQUENCE
| # | Timing | Subject Line Direction | Purpose |
|---|--------|----------------------|---------|
| 1 | Immediate | [direction] | Deliver + set expectations |
| 2 | Day 1-2 | [direction] | Quick win |
| 3 | Day 3-4 | [direction] | Mechanism tease |
| 4 | Day 5-6 | [direction] | Social proof |
| 5 | Day 7 | [direction] | Paid offer |
---
### FUNNEL BRIDGE VALIDATION
[Pass/fail on each bridge criterion]Quality Criteria
- Offer name must be specific and outcome-driven — generic names like "Free Guide" signal low value
- Hook angle must create a curiosity gap that the paid product fills — not give away the whole mechanism
- Landing page headlines must use three distinct RMBC lead patterns — not three variations of the same angle
- Perceived value anchor must be credible — a $5 checklist positioned as "$497 value" destroys trust
- Production cost must be itemized and compared against budget constraint — no surprises
- Email follow-up must bridge to the paid product within 7 days — longer sequences lose momentum
- The free offer must solve a real problem completely enough to build trust, but not so completely that the paid product feels unnecessary
- Specificity gate: Every recommendation must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "high value" or "strong appeal"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The brief must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The brief must address "what's the catch?" and "is this worth my email?" — include at least 2 trust-building elements (social proof, no-spam promise, instant access, preview of value)
Related Skills
- Run
/welcome-sequenceto expand the 5-email follow-up into a full onboarding sequence - Run
/lander-copyto write the full landing page from the headline directions - Run
/hook-batteryto generate additional headline and ad hook variations - Run
/funnel-architectureto see where this free offer fits in the complete funnel - Run
/offer-stackto design the paid offer this free offer leads into - Validate the landing page with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

