hook-battery
Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate 10 scroll-stopping hooks across 5 psychological trigger types — the opening lines that determine whether a prospect reads or scrolls past. One of the 3 core RMBC skills.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skillsedited, first seen Mar 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skills★ 448% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- broadcast-emailSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- upsell-sequence-writerSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 28
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md for framework overview.
- Distinctive: line 44
Must promise a specific revelation, not vague intrigue
- Distinctive: line 49
Must name a real, specific threat — not manufactured anxiety
- Distinctive: line 54
Must include at least one concrete detail (number, timeframe, or named result)
- Distinctive: line 59
Must reference a real or plausible proof point — never fabricate
- Distinctive: line 64
Must target advice the audience has actually heard and believed
- Distinctive: line 113
Every hook must name something specific — no "improve your life" or "get better results"
- Distinctive: line 119
Specificity gate: Every hook must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "improve your life" or "get better results"
- Distinctive: line 120
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 122
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Very specific: line 127
Run /mechanism-ideation first for mechanism-driven hooks
- Very specific: line 128
Run /unified-research-synthesizer for audience language patterns
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
hook-battery
Purpose
Generate 10 hooks (2 per type) across 5 psychological trigger categories. A hook is the FIRST thing a prospect sees — the opening line of an ad, email, landing page, or video. It determines whether they engage or scroll past. Stefan's standard: if a hook could apply to any product, it's too generic. Every hook must be specific to the product, reference its mechanism when possible, and work in 1-2 lines on a mobile screen.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
product_description | Yes | What the product is, what it does, key features/ingredients/components |
target_audience | Yes | Who the prospect is — demographics, pain points, desires, sophistication level |
key_mechanism | No | The product's unique mechanism (output from /mechanism-ideation) |
key_result | No | The specific transformation or outcome the product delivers |
tone | No | One of: aggressive, conversational, professional (default: conversational) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md for framework overview. Hooks sit at the top of the copy funnel — they must earn the next line of reading.
Step 2 — Extract Hook Fuel
From inputs, identify:
- Specific numbers — stats, timeframes, dollar amounts, percentages
- Mechanism language — named processes, compounds, or systems to reference
- Audience pain language — exact words the prospect uses to describe their problem
- Desire language — exact words the prospect uses to describe their ideal outcome
- Contrarian angles — common advice in this space that can be challenged
Step 3 — Generate 10 Hooks (2 Per Type)
Curiosity (×2)
Pattern: Open a knowledge gap the reader must close.
- "The weird trick that..." / "Why [unexpected thing] works better than..."
- Must promise a specific revelation, not vague intrigue
Fear (×2)
Pattern: Surface a cost or danger the reader hasn't considered.
- "Are you making this [specific cost] mistake?" / "The hidden danger in..."
- Must name a real, specific threat — not manufactured anxiety
Desire (×2)
Pattern: Paint the outcome so vividly the reader self-selects.
- "How to [specific outcome] in [timeframe]" / "What if you could..."
- Must include at least one concrete detail (number, timeframe, or named result)
Social Proof (×2)
Pattern: Leverage credibility or crowd behavior.
- "[X] people already..." / "The method [credible person/group] uses to..."
- Must reference a real or plausible proof point — never fabricate
Contrarian (×2)
Pattern: Challenge conventional wisdom to stop the scroll.
- "Stop [common advice]" / "Everything you know about [topic] is wrong"
- Must target advice the audience has actually heard and believed
Step 4 — Validate Each Hook
For every hook, check:
- Specificity — Could this apply to a different product? If yes, rewrite.
- Mobile fit — Does it work in 1-2 lines on a phone screen? If no, shorten.
- Mechanism tie-in — Does it reference the product's mechanism (when provided)? Prefer hooks that do.
- Scroll-stop power — Would this make YOU stop scrolling? Be honest.
Output Format
## Hook Battery: [Product Name]
**Audience:** [target audience summary]
**Mechanism:** [key mechanism, if provided]
**Tone:** [aggressive | conversational | professional]
---
| # | Hook Type | Hook Text | Why It Works | Platform Fit |
|---|-----------|-----------|-------------|-------------|
| 1 | Curiosity | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 2 | Curiosity | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 3 | Fear | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 4 | Fear | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 5 | Desire | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 6 | Desire | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 7 | Social Proof | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 8 | Social Proof | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 9 | Contrarian | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
| 10 | Contrarian | [hook] | [1 line] | Meta / Native / Email / YouTube |
---
## Top 3 Picks
1. **Hook #X** — [why this is the strongest] — Best for: [platform]
2. **Hook #X** — [why] — Best for: [platform]
3. **Hook #X** — [why] — Best for: [platform]
## Testing Notes
[1-2 lines on which hooks to A/B test first and why]Quality Criteria
- Every hook must name something specific — no "improve your life" or "get better results"
- At least 4 of 10 hooks should reference the product's mechanism (when provided)
- Platform Fit must vary — not all hooks suit all platforms
- Hooks must be mobile-first: 1-2 lines max on a phone screen
- Each "Why It Works" must name the psychological lever, not restate the hook
- Specificity gate: Every hook must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "improve your life" or "get better results"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: Hooks must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: Hooks must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
Related Skills
- Run
/mechanism-ideationfirst for mechanism-driven hooks - Run
/unified-research-synthesizerfor audience language patterns - Feed hooks into copy formats:
/pdp-ecomm-template,/webinar-registration-copy - Validate copy using these hooks with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

