agentleFS
coleschaffercoleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/skills/advertorial-writer/SKILL.md

advertorial-writer

Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate RMBC-structured advertorial and native ad copy that reads like editorial content but drives direct response conversions.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions.

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    Verify against traffic source requirements:

    line 58
  3. Distinctive:

    Native: No before/after claims, no income claims, disclaimer required

    line 59
  4. Distinctive:

    Facebook: No personal attributes ("Are you overweight?"), no exaggerated claims

    line 60
  5. Distinctive:

    Google: No superlatives without substantiation, landing page must match ad

    line 61
  6. Distinctive:

    Must read like real editorial content — if it obviously reads as an ad, it fails

    line 103
  7. Distinctive:

    No product mention in the first 30% of copy

    line 104
  8. Distinctive:

    Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"

    line 110
  9. Distinctive:

    Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)

    line 111
  10. Distinctive:

    Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode

    line 113
  11. Very specific:

    Run /mechanism-ideation to develop the mechanism "discovery"

    line 118
  12. Very specific:

    Run /hook-battery for headline and angle options

    line 119
  13. Very specific:

    Run /unified-research-synthesizer for audience language and data points

    line 120

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

advertorial-writer

Purpose

Generate advertorial copy that looks and feels like editorial content but sells. Advertorials are the bridge between paid traffic and a sales page — the prospect clicks an ad, lands on what looks like a news article or blog post, and by the end they're ready to buy. The key tension: it must feel editorial (not salesy) while still deploying RMBC persuasion structure. Traffic source context matters — native ad platforms (Taboola, Outbrain) have different compliance and style requirements than social traffic.

Inputs

InputRequiredDescription
product_descriptionYesWhat the product is, what it does, key features/ingredients/components
target_audienceYesWho the prospect is — demographics, pain points, desires, sophistication level
angleYesThe editorial angle — the "news peg" or story that frames the product (e.g., "new study reveals...", "local mom discovers...")
traffic_sourceYesOne of: native (Taboola/Outbrain), facebook, google, email, organic
key_mechanismNoThe product's unique mechanism (output from /mechanism-ideation)
toneNoOne of: news, personal_story, investigative, listicle (default: personal_story)

Execution Protocol

Step 1 — Load Framework Context

Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Advertorials deploy RMBC through an editorial lens — the Research phase becomes "reporting," the Mechanism becomes the "discovery," and the Brief structures the narrative arc.

Step 2 — Select Advertorial Format

Based on tone input:

FormatStructureBest For
NewsHeadline → dateline → discovery → expert quotes → mechanism → product mention → CTAHealth, finance, tech
Personal Story"I" narrative → problem → failed attempts → discovery → results → recommendationWeight loss, beauty, self-improvement
InvestigativeQuestion headline → industry exposé → hidden truth → mechanism → solution → CTASupplements, skincare, finance
ListicleNumber headline → tips/facts → mechanism woven in → product as #1 solution → CTABroad audiences, social traffic

Step 3 — Write the Advertorial

Structure (all formats):

  1. Headline — Must look editorial, not like an ad. Include the angle. No price, no "buy now."
  2. Byline + Date — Author name, publication-style date. Adds credibility.
  3. Lead (100-150 words) — Open with the angle. Story, stat, or news hook. No product mention yet.
  4. Problem Section (150-200 words) — Establish the problem through the editorial lens. Use data, quotes, or story details.
  5. Failed Solutions (100-150 words) — Why conventional approaches fall short. Builds frustration.
  6. Mechanism Reveal (200-300 words) — The "discovery" — present the mechanism as news, not as a sales pitch. Use expert language, study references, analogies.
  7. Product Introduction (100-150 words) — Natural transition from mechanism to product. "One company has figured out how to..."
  8. Social Proof (150-200 words) — Testimonials framed as interviews or case studies. Editorial voice.
  9. CTA Section (100-150 words) — Soft sell. "Learn more" framing, not "Buy Now." Include link placement.

Step 4 — Compliance Check

Verify against traffic source requirements:

  • Native: No before/after claims, no income claims, disclaimer required
  • Facebook: No personal attributes ("Are you overweight?"), no exaggerated claims
  • Google: No superlatives without substantiation, landing page must match ad
  • Email/Organic: More latitude, but maintain editorial voice

Flag any lines that may trigger platform rejection.

Output Format

## Advertorial: [Headline]

**Angle:** [editorial angle]
**Format:** [news | personal_story | investigative | listicle]
**Traffic Source:** [platform]
**Word Count:** ~X,XXX

---

**[Byline]** | [Date]

[Full advertorial copy with section markers]

---

## Compliance Notes

- [Any flagged lines or platform-specific concerns]
- [Suggested disclaimer text if needed]

## A/B Test Variants

### Headline Variant A
[Original headline]

### Headline Variant B
[Alternative headline — different angle or hook type]

### Lead Variant
[Alternative opening paragraph]

Quality Criteria

  • Must read like real editorial content — if it obviously reads as an ad, it fails
  • No product mention in the first 30% of copy
  • Mechanism section must educate, not pitch
  • CTA must feel like a natural next step, not a hard close
  • Headline must work as a native ad thumbnail — curiosity-driven, not salesy
  • Social proof must be framed editorially (interviews, case studies) not as testimonial blocks
  • Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
  • Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
  • Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
  • Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
  • Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)

Related Skills

  • Run /mechanism-ideation to develop the mechanism "discovery"
  • Run /hook-battery for headline and angle options
  • Run /unified-research-synthesizer for audience language and data points
  • Feed advertorial traffic to landing pages built with /lander-copy
  • Validate with /rmbc-copy-audit

Attribution

Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.