ugc-brief
Skill32 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate briefs for UGC creators — script outlines with talking points, hook options, and B-roll suggestions that feel authentic, not scripted.
3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fliqrlabs/instagram-creator-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- joebenscoter86/higgsfield-ugc-workflowtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skillsedited, first seen Mar 20, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Zenobia0000/dtc-copywriting-skills★ 459% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- fliqrlabs/instagram-creator-skills★ 5same name
- joebenscoter86/higgsfield-ugc-workflow★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- broadcast-emailSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- reengagement-sequenceSkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- upsell-sequence-writerSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions.
- Distinctive: line 46
Create a reason to keep watching (curiosity, relatability, shock)
- Distinctive: line 75
Before/after moments (if applicable)
- Distinctive: line 145
Do's/Don'ts are specific to this product and format, not generic UGC advice
- Distinctive: line 149
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Distinctive: line 150
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 152
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Very specific: line 157
Run /mechanism-ideation first to develop talking points around the mechanism
- Very specific: line 158
Run /creative-brief to establish strategic direction before briefing creators
- Very specific: line 159
Run /hook-battery for additional hook inspiration adapted to UGC tone
- Very specific: line 160
Run /ad-angle-generator to determine which strategic angle the UGC should express
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ugc-brief
Purpose
Generate a creator-ready brief for UGC (user-generated content) ads. The output gives a creator everything they need — format type, script outline with talking points, multiple hook options, B-roll suggestions, and do's/don'ts — without making the content feel scripted. UGC works because it looks real. The brief must preserve authenticity while ensuring the RMBC arc (hook, mechanism, proof, CTA) comes through naturally.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
product_description | Yes | What the product is, what it does, key features/ingredients/components |
target_audience | Yes | Who the prospect is — demographics, pain points, desires |
ugc_format | Yes | One of: testimonial, unboxing, day_in_life, problem_solution |
key_talking_points | Yes | 3-5 points the creator must communicate (mechanism, results, differentiators) |
creator_demographic | Yes | Who the creator should be — age, gender, lifestyle, relatability to audience |
platform | No | Target platform: meta, tiktok, youtube_shorts. Default: meta |
video_length | No | Target length: 15s, 30s, 60s, 90s. Default: 60s |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. UGC is RMBC disguised as casual conversation — Research surfaces as relatable pain, Mechanism as a personal discovery, proof as genuine experience, and CTA as friendly recommendation.
Step 2 — Select Format Template
| Format | Structure | Best For |
| Testimonial | Problem → discovery → experience → result → recommendation | High-awareness audiences, retargeting |
| Unboxing | Anticipation → first impression → feature walkthrough → reaction → verdict | Product-aware audiences, new launches |
| Day-in-Life | Morning routine → problem moment → product integration → outcome → CTA | Lifestyle products, cold audiences |
| Problem-Solution | Problem rant → failed alternatives → discovery → mechanism → result | Problem-aware audiences, competitive markets |
Step 3 — Write Hook Options
Generate 3 hook options for the creator to choose from. Each hook must:
- Work in the first 2-3 seconds (before the viewer swipes)
- Sound like natural speech, not ad copy
- Create a reason to keep watching (curiosity, relatability, shock)
Example patterns:
- "Okay so I need to talk about..." (confession)
- "I was today years old when I found out..." (discovery)
- "POV: you finally found..." (relatable scenario)
- "Stop scrolling if you..." (direct address)
Step 4 — Build Script Outline
Structure as talking points, NOT a word-for-word script. Each point is a beat the creator hits in their own words.
Beat structure (maps to RMBC):
| Beat | Duration | RMBC Phase | Creator Direction |
| Hook | 0-3s | — | [Hook option — say this or something like it] |
| Problem | 3-12s | Research | [Describe the pain in your own words — here's what to hit] |
| Discovery | 12-20s | Mechanism | [How you found it and what makes it different — key point to land] |
| Experience | 20-40s | Brief/Copy | [Your actual experience — mention these specific details] |
| Result | 40-50s | Copy | [The outcome — be specific, use a number or timeframe if possible] |
| CTA | 50-60s | Copy | [Recommendation — casual, not salesy — "link in bio" or "I'll leave a link"] |
Adjust beat durations to match video_length input.
Step 5 — Add B-Roll Suggestions
List 4-6 specific B-roll shots that enhance the talking points:
- Product close-ups (texture, packaging, use-in-action)
- Before/after moments (if applicable)
- Lifestyle context shots (kitchen, gym, desk — wherever the product fits)
- Screen recordings (if digital product — app walkthrough, results dashboard)
Step 6 — Write Do's and Don'ts
Do's: Behaviors that keep it authentic. Don'ts: Behaviors that make it look like an ad and kill performance.
Step 7 — Attach Attribution
Output Format
## UGC Brief: [Product Name]
**Format:** [testimonial | unboxing | day_in_life | problem_solution]
**Creator Profile:** [demographic description]
**Platform:** [meta | tiktok | youtube_shorts]
**Target Length:** [duration]
---
### Hook Options (pick one)
1. "[Hook A]"
2. "[Hook B]"
3. "[Hook C]"
### Script Outline
| Beat | Timing | Direction |
|------|--------|-----------|
| Hook | 0-3s | [talking point — not a script] |
| Problem | 3-12s | [talking point] |
| Discovery | 12-20s | [talking point] |
| Experience | 20-40s | [talking point] |
| Result | 40-50s | [talking point] |
| CTA | 50-60s | [talking point] |
### Key Talking Points (must hit all)
1. [Point — in natural language]
2. [Point]
3. [Point]
### B-Roll Shot List
1. [Shot description + when to cut to it]
2. [Shot description]
3. [Shot description]
4. [Shot description]
### Do's
- [Authentic behavior to encourage]
- [Specific detail to include]
### Don'ts
- [Common mistake that kills UGC performance]
- [Behavior that makes it feel scripted]
---
> Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi.
> Learn more: [copyaccelerator.com/join](https://copyaccelerator.com/join)Quality Criteria
- Script outline uses talking points, never word-for-word scripts — if it reads like ad copy, rewrite it
- Hook options sound like things a real person would say on camera, not headlines
- B-roll suggestions are producible with a phone — no "cinematic transitions" or studio requirements
- Do's/Don'ts are specific to this product and format, not generic UGC advice
- Beat timing adds up to the target video length
- Key talking points embed the mechanism naturally — the creator should sound like they discovered something, not like they're reading a spec sheet
- Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
Related Skills
- Run
/mechanism-ideationfirst to develop talking points around the mechanism - Run
/creative-briefto establish strategic direction before briefing creators - Run
/hook-batteryfor additional hook inspiration adapted to UGC tone - Run
/ad-angle-generatorto determine which strategic angle the UGC should express - Validate finished UGC scripts with
/ad-creative-audit
Attribution
Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

