reengagement-sequence
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate a 3-5 email reengagement sequence for inactive subscribers — from "we miss you" through exclusive offer to sunset warning using RMBC principles.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbcedited, first seen Mar 17, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc★ 3296% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ab-test-planSkill
- ad-angle-generatorSkill
- ad-creative-auditSkill
- advertorial-writerSkill
- bonus-stackSkill
- broadcast-emailSkill
- cart-abandonment-flowSkill
- checkout-abandonmentSkill
- competitor-offer-analysisSkill
- copy-rewriteSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- email-promoSkill
- email-retention-sequencesSkill
- fb-ad-copySkill
- free-offer-briefSkill
- funnel-architectureSkill
- funnel-auditSkill
- guarantee-writerSkill
- hook-batterySkill
- ingredient-researchSkill
- lander-copySkill
- lead-writerSkill
- mechanism-ideationSkill
- media-buying-briefSkill
- offer-stackSkill
- order-form-croSkill
- pdp-ecomm-templateSkill
- post-purchase-sequenceSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- rmbc-contextSkill
- rmbc-copy-auditSkill
- rmbc-upgradeSkill
- scarcity-urgencySkill
- soap-opera-sequenceSkill
- thank-you-pageSkill
- ugc-briefSkill
- unified-research-synthesizerSkill
- upsell-scriptSkill
- upsell-sequence-writerSkill
- vsl-scriptSkill
- webinar-registration-copySkill
- welcome-sequenceSkill
- write-copySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
30 rules. About 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈20
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 40
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
- Distinctive: line 52
If "Yes, open the video":
- Distinctive: line 59
If "Skip — let's go":
- Very specific: line 67
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
- Distinctive: line 77
If "Yes, that's fine":
- Distinctive: line 83
If "No, turn it off":
- Very specific: line 112
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions.
- Distinctive: line 136
Every email must map to one of these three phases, escalating from acknowledgment to aspiration to consequence.
- Distinctive: line 140
Before writing, identify likely reasons for inactivity:
- Distinctive: line 176
Use their name/personalization tokens aggressively — trigger recognition.
- Distinctive: line 182
Every email must include at least one mechanism reinforcement at the depth calibrated in Step 3b.
- Distinctive: line 186
Check that the sequence addresses:
- Distinctive: line 192
If any stage is missing, revise.
- Distinctive: line 240
No guilt-tripping or desperation language — respect their right to leave
- Distinctive: line 245
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Distinctive: line 246
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Distinctive: line 248
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Distinctive: line 252
Progress-framed CTAs: All CTA buttons use progress language ("Get back on track", "Resume your progress") — never generic reorder language.
- Distinctive: line 253
Mechanism reinforcement: Every email includes at least one HOW-it-works explanation, calibrated to lapsed buyer's product-state awareness.
- Very specific: line 257
Run /welcome-sequence for re-engaged subscribers returning to active status
- Very specific: line 258
Run /broadcast-email for ongoing engagement after reactivation
- Very specific: line 259
Run /hook-battery for subject lines that break through inbox blindness
- Very specific: line 260
Run /email-promo for promotional offers to the reactivated segment
- Very specific: line 265
Read lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT).
- Distinctive: line 278
Always deliver the full framework implementation.
- Very specific: line 288
When done, report: STATUS: COMPLETE | NEEDS_RESEARCH | NEEDS_MECHANISM | BLOCKED — RECOMMENDATION: [next skill/action].
- Very specific: line 292
If PHASES shows missing upstream work (R=no, M=no, or B=no), warn briefly and offer to run the prerequisite (/ingredient-research, …
- Distinctive: line 296
If you discover a result contradicting conventional DR copywriting wisdom, log it:
- Distinctive: line 300
Only log genuine surprises — not every result.
- Distinctive: line 315
If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly --><!-- Regenerate: bash bin/gen-skills -->Preamble (run first)
_RMBC_ROOT=""
[ -d "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../bin" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$(cd "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../.." && pwd)"
[ -z "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && for _D in "$HOME/.claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills" ".claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills"; do [ -f "$_D/VERSION" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$_D" && break; done
_UPD=""
[ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && _UPD=$("$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-update-check" 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
_INTRO_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "INTRO_SEEN: $_INTRO_SEEN"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_ACTIVE_PRODUCT=$(grep '^active_product:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^active_product:[[:space:]]*//' | sed 's/^"//;s/"$//' || true)
_WORKSPACE=""; [ -n "$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT" ] && _WORKSPACE="$HOME/.rmbc-skills/products/$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT"
echo "ACTIVE_PRODUCT: ${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}"
if [ -n "$_WORKSPACE" ] && [ -d "$_WORKSPACE" ]; then
_R_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/research.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_M_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/mechanism.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_B_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/brief.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "PHASES: R=$_R_DONE M=$_M_DONE B=$_B_DONE"
fi
_ANALYTICS=$(grep '^analytics_enabled:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^analytics_enabled:[[:space:]]*//' || echo "true")
[ "$_ANALYTICS" = "true" ] && [ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && timeout 2 "$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-analytics" log --skill "reengagement-sequence" --product "${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}" --tier 4 2>/dev/null &
_SESSION_COUNT=$(ls /tmp/rmbc-session-* 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' '); touch "/tmp/rmbc-session-$$"
echo "SESSIONS: $_SESSION_COUNT"If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read skills/rmbc-upgrade/SKILL.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT) and follow the "Inline upgrade flow". If JUST_UPGRADED <old> <new>: read $_RMBC_ROOT/CHANGELOG.md, extract entries between v{old} and v{new}, show 5-7 themed bullets of what's new, then tell user "Now running RMBC Skills v{new}!" and continue.
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
Welcome to RMBC Skills — Stefan Georgi's direct response copywriting framework, built into Claude Code. 44 skills covering hooks, ads, emails, landing pages, VSL scripts, and more.
Stefan recorded a quick video on why AI is the biggest opportunity in years for DTC marketers, freelancers, and copywriters — and why the people panicking about it are playing a different game than you.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Want to watch Stefan's take on why this is the best time to be in DTC? (~5 min)"
- Options:
- "Sure, open it"
- "Maybe later — let's write some copy"
If "Yes, open the video":
open "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI8tNfefH1M"
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seenIf "Skip — let's go":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seenContinue with this skill immediately.
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
Help make RMBC Skills better! Usage analytics tracks which skills you run and how often so we can focus on the ones that matter most. Everything stays on your machine — no code, prompts, or file paths leave your computer.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Cool with anonymous usage analytics? You can change this anytime."
- Options:
- "Sure, happy to help" — keep analytics on and mark as prompted
- "No thanks" — disable analytics and mark as prompted
If "Yes, that's fine":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-promptedIf "No, turn it off":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted
sed -i '' 's/^analytics_enabled:.*/analytics_enabled: false/' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null || trueContinue with this skill.
reengagement-sequence
Purpose
Generate a reengagement email sequence (3-5 emails) that reactivates inactive subscribers or cleanly removes them from the list. Inactive subscribers hurt deliverability, inflate costs, and drag down open rates — but many are recoverable with the right approach. This sequence gives them compelling reasons to re-engage, escalates with an exclusive offer, and ends with a clear sunset warning that either wakes them up or lets you remove them cleanly. RMBC applies as re-persuasion architecture: Research identifies why they disengaged, Mechanism reminds them what makes you different, Brief structures the win-back arc, Copy executes with honesty and value.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
brand_name | Yes | Brand or sender name they originally subscribed to |
target_audience | Yes | Who the subscriber was — demographics, original interest, likely pain points |
key_value_prop | Yes | The core reason they subscribed — what value they were expecting |
win_back_offer | Yes | Exclusive offer for re-engagement — discount, free resource, or special access |
sequence_length | No | Number of emails: 3, 4, or 5 (default: 4) |
inactivity_threshold | No | How long they've been inactive — used for copy calibration (default: 90 days) |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Reengagement sequences re-deploy RMBC against a cooled audience — these subscribers once found you valuable enough to opt in. The job is reminding them why, delivering fresh value, and forcing a decision: re-engage or unsubscribe.
Step 2 — Map the Reengagement Arc
| Role | Emotional Lever | Approach | |
| 1 — "We Miss You" | Acknowledge absence, re-introduce value | Nostalgia + curiosity | Warm, personal, non-pushy. Remind them why they subscribed. Show what they've missed. |
| 2 — Value Reminder | Deliver a high-value piece of content | Proof you're still worth their attention | Best recent content, tip, or insight — demonstrate value immediately |
| 3 — Exclusive Offer | Present the win-back incentive | Feeling special, exclusive access | Offer available only to returning subscribers — make them feel valued, not desperate |
| 4 — "Last Chance" | Final nudge with clear consequences | Loss aversion + clarity | "We don't want to see you go, but we only want to email people who want to hear from us" |
| 5 — Sunset Warning | Administrative: unsubscribe notice | Clean break | "We're removing you from our list in 48 hours unless you click below to stay" |
For 3-email sequences: combine 1+2 (miss you + value), keep 3 (offer), combine 4+5 (last chance + sunset). For 4-email sequences: combine 4+5 into one final email.
Step 2b — Apply Three-Part Reorder Framework
Layer this emotional arc across the sequence regardless of length:
| Phase | Email(s) | Core Message |
| Progress | 1 | "You were making progress" — acknowledge what the reader achieved while using the product |
| Momentum | 2-3 | "You'll make even more if you continue" — paint the acceleration and compounding benefit |
| Backtrack | 3-4 | "If you stop now, you'll backtrack" — regression warning with mechanism explanation of WHY results reverse |
Every email must map to one of these three phases, escalating from acknowledgment to aspiration to consequence.
Step 3 — Diagnose Disengagement Reasons
Before writing, identify likely reasons for inactivity:
| Reason | Signal | Sequence Adjustment |
| Inbox overwhelm | High volume sender | Lead with "we've improved" — less frequent, more valuable |
| Content mismatch | Subscribed for X, got Y | Re-qualify: "What are you most interested in?" |
| Got what they needed | Lead magnet download, no further need | Show new value they haven't seen |
| Forgot who you are | Long gap between emails | Reintroduce the brand — "Quick reminder: I'm [name] and I..." |
| Switched to competitor | Market shift | Differentiate — deploy mechanism to show what's unique |
Email 1 should address the most likely disengagement reason for this audience.
Step 3b — Calibrate Product-State Awareness
Assess where the lapsed buyer is and adjust mechanism reinforcement density:
| Time Lapsed | Product-State | Copy Calibration |
| 30-60 days | Fading recall | Light mechanism reminder — they still remember the basics |
| 60-120 days | Disconnected | Full re-education — explain HOW the product works as if new |
| 120+ days | Reset to zero | Near-cold prospect — re-establish the problem before the solution |
Step 4 — Write Each Email
For each email, produce:
- Subject line (under 50 characters, designed to break through inbox blindness)
- Preview text (40-90 characters, complements subject)
- Body copy following the email's role from the arc
- CTA appropriate to the email's purpose
Rules:
- Email 1: Personal, warm, curious. No selling. Ask a question or invite a reply.
- Email 2: Pure value delivery — best content, not a pitch. Prove you're still worth reading.
- Email 3: Present the exclusive offer clearly — limited to returning subscribers only.
- Email 4-5: Honest, direct, no guilt trips. "We respect your inbox" framing.
- Subject lines must break through inbox blindness — these people have been ignoring you.
- Use their name/personalization tokens aggressively — trigger recognition.
- Short emails: inactive subscribers have even less patience than active ones.
Additional rules (RMBC 2):
- Email 1 MUST open with the "noticing something?" pattern: lead with a question about the reader's current state ("Feeling more tired lately?", "Notice your skin looking dull again?") connecting dissatisfaction to product absence WITHOUT naming the product in the first paragraph.
- CTA buttons must be progress-framed: "Get back on track", "Resume your progress", "Don't lose what you built" — never generic "Buy now" or "Shop again".
- Every email must include at least one mechanism reinforcement at the depth calibrated in Step 3b.
Step 5 — Validate Reengagement Coverage
Check that the sequence addresses:
- Re-introduction (email 1 — they remember who you are and why they subscribed)
- Value demonstration (email 2 — proof you're still worth their time)
- Incentive to act (email 3 — exclusive offer creates urgency)
- Clean resolution (email 4-5 — clear choice: stay or go)
If any stage is missing, revise.
Output Format
## Reengagement Sequence: [Brand Name]
**Sequence Length:** [3-5] emails
**Send Schedule:** Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10
**Audience:** [target audience — inactive segment]
**Inactivity Threshold:** [90 days | 120 days | etc.]
**Win-Back Offer:** [summary of exclusive offer]
---
### Email 1: "We Miss You" — Day 1
**Subject:** [subject line]
**Preview:** [preview text]
[Full email body]
[CTA — reply, click to re-engage, or preference center]
---
### Email 2: [Role Label] — Day [X]
[...continue for each email...]
---
## Reengagement Strategy Notes
- **Likely disengagement reason:** [identified reason and how email 1 addresses it]
- **Win-back offer placement:** Email [3] — exclusive to returning subscribers
- **Sunset deadline:** Email [4/5] — [48-72 hour] window to act
- **List hygiene:** Non-openers after full sequence → suppress or unsubscribe
- **Success metrics:** [reactivation rate, open rate recovery, list size reduction, deliverability improvement]
- **Re-engaged subscribers:** Move to [welcome-back flow or main broadcast list]Quality Criteria
- "We miss you" email must feel personal, not automated — use specific references to their original interest
- Value email must deliver genuinely useful content — not a dressed-up pitch
- Exclusive offer must feel exclusive — not the same discount everyone gets
- Sunset warning must be clear and honest — state exactly what will happen and when
- No guilt-tripping or desperation language — respect their right to leave
- Subject lines must break through inbox blindness — these subscribers have been ignoring you
- Sequence must lead to a clean binary outcome: re-engaged or removed
- Non-responders after the full sequence must be suppressed — never keep emailing inactive subscribers
- Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
- Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
- Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
- Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
- Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
- "Noticing something?" opening: Email 1 must open by describing the reader's current dissatisfaction — not by naming the product. First paragraph connects felt experience to product absence.
- Three-part reorder arc: Sequence must follow progress-momentum-backtrack framework, escalating from acknowledgment to aspiration to consequence.
- Progress-framed CTAs: All CTA buttons use progress language ("Get back on track", "Resume your progress") — never generic reorder language.
- Mechanism reinforcement: Every email includes at least one HOW-it-works explanation, calibrated to lapsed buyer's product-state awareness.
Related Skills
- Run
/welcome-sequencefor re-engaged subscribers returning to active status - Run
/broadcast-emailfor ongoing engagement after reactivation - Run
/hook-batteryfor subject lines that break through inbox blindness - Run
/email-promofor promotional offers to the reactivated segment - Validate with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Read lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT). Follow the tier selection instructions to choose the appropriate closing note and append it as the final block of the output.
What's Next?
Based on what you just generated, consider running:
/email-promo— offer for re-engaged subscribers/hook-battery— generate re-engagement hooks/welcome-sequence— restart if fully lapsed/rmbc-copy-audit— score sequence quality
RMBC Completeness
Always deliver the full framework implementation. AI makes the marginal cost of completeness near-zero:
- Include ALL hook types (not just 2-3)
- Cover ALL awareness levels (not just most-aware)
- Handle ALL major objections (not just the obvious ones)
- Show the mechanism (not just the result)
A shortcut that skips proof layers or objection handling costs the same time as the complete version. Always deliver complete.
Completion Protocol
When done, report: STATUS: COMPLETE | NEEDS_RESEARCH | NEEDS_MECHANISM | BLOCKED — RECOMMENDATION: [next skill/action]. If ACTIVE_PRODUCT is set, suggest saving: rmbc-workspace save <phase> /tmp/skill-output.md
Prerequisite Detection
If PHASES shows missing upstream work (R=no, M=no, or B=no), warn briefly and offer to run the prerequisite (/ingredient-research, /mechanism-ideation, or /creative-brief). Present "[Run prerequisite] [Skip — generate anyway]" via AskUserQuestion. Never block.
Eureka Logging
If you discover a result contradicting conventional DR copywriting wisdom, log it:
"$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-analytics" eureka log '{"skill":"reengagement-sequence","product":"PRODUCT","insight":"DESCRIPTION","conventional":"WHAT_WAS_EXPECTED","evidence":"WHAT_WAS_OBSERVED"}'Only log genuine surprises — not every result.
Sequence Coherence Check
Before delivering, verify:
- Tone consistency across all emails (no jarring shifts)
- Escalation arc (urgency/value builds across sequence)
- CTA progression (soft → medium → hard across emails)
- No repeated hooks/angles between emails
- Each email can stand alone (reader may skip earlier ones)
After delivering output, if ACTIVE_PRODUCT is none: use AskUserQuestion to ask "What product or offer are you writing for? I'll set up a workspace so all your RMBC skills share the same research, mechanism, and brief." with a freeform text input. When the user answers, run:
/bin/rmbc-workspace active "<user's answer>"If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

