workflow-test-fix
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Unified test-fix pipeline combining test generation (session, context, analysis, task gen) with iterative test-cycle execution (adaptive strategy, progressive testing, CLI fallback). Triggers on "workflow-test-fix", "test fix workflow".
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorerword for word, first seen May 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 45100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-iter-tuneSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-brainstormSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-roadmap-devSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-testingSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 70
Before dispatching to phase execution, collect workflow preferences via AskUserQuestion:
- Distinctive: line 172
No Preliminary Analysis: Do not read files or gather context before starting the phase
- Distinctive: line 175
Track Progress: Update TaskCreate/TaskUpdate dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
- Distinctive: line 178
Progressive Loading: Read phase doc ONLY when that phase is about to execute
- Distinctive: line 230
After Phase 4 completes, display the following summary before auto-continuing to Phase 5:
- Very specific: line 416
After completion, ask user if they want to expand into issues (test/enhance/refactor/doc).
- Very specific: line 465
When -y or --yes is detected in $ARGUMENTS or propagated via ccw:
- Very specific: line 467
Use default values for all workflow preferences (workflowPreferences = { autoYes: true })
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<purpose>
Unified test-fix orchestrator that combines **test planning generation** (Phase 1-4) with **iterative test-cycle execution** (Phase 5) into a single end-to-end pipeline. Creates test sessions with progressive L0-L3 test layers, generates test tasks, then executes them with adaptive fix cycles until pass rate >= 95% or max iterations reached. Triggered via skill name routing for full pipeline or execute-only modes.
</purpose><process>1. Architecture Overview
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Workflow Test Fix Orchestrator (SKILL.md) │
│ → Pure coordinator: Route entry point, track progress, pass context │
│ → Five phases: Session → Context → Analysis → TaskGen → Execution │
└──────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌────────────┬────────────┬──────┴──────┬────────────┬────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
┌──────────┐┌──────────┐┌──────────┐┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Phase 1 ││ Phase 2 ││ Phase 3 ││ Phase 4 │ │ Phase 5 │
│ Session ││ Context ││ Analysis ││ Task Gen │ │ Test Cycle │
│ Start ││ Gather ││ Enhanced ││ Generate │ │ Execute │
│ ││ ││ ││ │ │ │
│ Input ││ Coverage ││ Gemini ││ IMPL_PLAN│ │ 1. Discovery│
│ Detect + ││ or Code ││ L0-L3 ││ IMPL-* │ │ 2. Execute │
│ Session ││ Scan ││ AI Issue ││ TODO_LIST│ │ 3. Fix Loop │
│ Create ││ ││ ││ │ │ 4. Complete │
└────┬─────┘└────┬─────┘└────┬─────┘└────┬─────┘ └──────────────┘
│ │ │ │ ↑
│testSessionId │ │ │
└──→────────┘contextPath│ │ │
└──→───────┘AnalysisRes│ │
└──→──────┘ testSessionId │
└──→──(Summary)──→┘
Task Pipeline (generated in Phase 4, executed in Phase 5):
┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ IMPL-001 │──→│ IMPL-001.3 │──→│ IMPL-001.5 │──→│ IMPL-002 │
│ Test Gen │ │ Code Validate │ │ Quality Gate │ │ Test & Fix │
│ L1-L3 │ │ L0 + AI Issues │ │ Coverage 80%+ │ │ Max N iter │
│@code-developer│ │ @test-fix-agent │ │ @test-fix-agent │ │@test-fix-agent│
└──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └──────────────┘2. Key Design Principles
- Unified Pipeline: Generation and execution are one continuous workflow - no manual handoff
- Pure Orchestrator: SKILL.md coordinates only - delegates all execution detail to phase files
- Auto-Continue: Phase 1→2→3→4→(Summary)→5 automatically
- Task Attachment/Collapse: Sub-tasks attached during phase execution, collapsed after completion
- Progressive Phase Loading: Phase docs read only when that phase executes, not upfront
- Adaptive Strategy: Fix loop auto-selects strategy (conservative/aggressive/surgical) based on iteration context
- Quality Gate: Pass rate >= 95% (criticality-aware) terminates the fix loop
- Phase File Hygiene: Phase files reference
workflowPreferences.*for preferences, no CLI flag parsing
3. Usage
Full pipeline and execute-only modes are triggered by skill name routing (see Mode Detection). Workflow preferences (auto mode) are collected interactively via AskUserQuestion before dispatching to phases.
Full pipeline (workflow-test-fix): Task description or session ID as arguments → interactive preference collection → generate + execute pipeline Execute only (workflow-test-fix): Auto-discovers active session → interactive preference collection → execution loop
4. Interactive Preference Collection
Before dispatching to phase execution, collect workflow preferences via AskUserQuestion:
// ★ 统一 auto mode 检测:-y/--yes 从 $ARGUMENTS 或 ccw 传播
const autoYes = /\b(-y|--yes)\b/.test($ARGUMENTS)
if (autoYes) {
// 自动模式:跳过所有询问,使用默认值
workflowPreferences = { autoYes: true }
} else {
const prefResponse = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "是否跳过所有确认步骤(自动模式)?",
header: "Auto Mode",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Interactive (Recommended)", description: "交互模式,包含确认步骤" },
{ label: "Auto", description: "跳过所有确认,自动执行" }
]
}
]
})
workflowPreferences = {
autoYes: prefResponse.autoMode === 'Auto'
}
}workflowPreferences is passed to phase execution as context variable, referenced as workflowPreferences.autoYes within phases.
5. Compact Recovery (Phase Persistence)
Multi-phase test-fix pipeline (Phase 1-5) spans long conversations, especially Phase 5 fix loops. Uses 双重保险: TodoWrite 跟踪 active phase 保护其不被压缩,sentinel 作为兜底。
⚠️ COMPACT DIRECTIVE: Context compression MUST check TodoWrite phase status. The phase currently marked
in_progressis the active execution phase — preserve its FULL content. Only compress phases markedcompletedorpending.
6. Execution Flow
Entry Point Detection:
├─ /workflow-test-fix → Full Pipeline (Phase 1→2→3→4→Summary→5)
└─ /workflow-test-fix → Execution Only (Phase 5)
Phase 1: Session Start (session-start)
└─ Read("phases/01-session-start.md")
├─ Step 1.0: Detect input mode (session | prompt)
├─ Step 1.1: Create test session → testSessionId
└─ Output: testSessionId, MODE
Phase 2: Test Context Gather (test-context-gather)
└─ Read("phases/02-test-context-gather.md")
├─ Step 1.2: Gather test context → contextPath
└─ Output: contextPath
Phase 3: Test Concept Enhanced (test-concept-enhanced)
└─ Read("phases/03-test-concept-enhanced.md")
├─ Step 1.3: Test analysis (Gemini) → TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
└─ Output: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
Phase 4: Test Task Generate (test-task-generate)
└─ Read("phases/04-test-task-generate.md")
├─ Step 1.4: Generate test tasks → IMPL_PLAN.md, IMPL-*.json, TODO_LIST.md
└─ Output: testSessionId, 4+ task JSONs
Summary Output (inline after Phase 4):
└─ Display summary, auto-continue to Phase 5
Phase 5: Test Cycle Execution (test-cycle-execute)
└─ Read("phases/05-test-cycle-execute.md")
├─ Step 2.1: Discovery (load session, tasks, iteration state)
├─ Step 2.2: Execute initial tasks (IMPL-001 → 001.3 → 001.5 → 002)
├─ Step 2.3: Fix loop (if pass_rate < 95%)
│ ├─ Select strategy: conservative/aggressive/surgical
│ ├─ Generate fix task via @cli-planning-agent
│ ├─ Execute fix via @test-fix-agent
│ └─ Re-test → loop or exit
└─ Step 2.4: Completion (summary, session archive)
└─ Output: final pass_rate, summaryPhase Reference Documents (read on-demand when phase executes):
| Phase | Document | Purpose | Compact |
| 1 | phases/01-session-start.md | Detect input mode, create test session | TodoWrite 驱动 |
| 2 | phases/02-test-context-gather.md | Gather test context (coverage/codebase) | TodoWrite 驱动 |
| 3 | phases/03-test-concept-enhanced.md | Gemini analysis, L0-L3 test requirements | TodoWrite 驱动 |
| 4 | phases/04-test-task-generate.md | Generate task JSONs and IMPL_PLAN.md | TodoWrite 驱动 |
| 5 | phases/05-test-cycle-execute.md | Execute tasks, iterative fix cycles, completion | TodoWrite 驱动 + 🔄 sentinel |
Compact Rules:
- TodoWrite
in_progress→ 保留完整内容,禁止压缩 - TodoWrite
completed→ 可压缩为摘要 - 🔄 sentinel fallback → Phase 5 包含 compact sentinel;若 compact 后仅存 sentinel 而无完整 Step 协议,必须立即
Read("phases/05-test-cycle-execute.md")恢复
7. Core Rules
- Start Immediately: First action is TaskCreate initialization, second action is Phase 1 (or Phase 5 for execute-only entry)
- No Preliminary Analysis: Do not read files or gather context before starting the phase
- Parse Every Output: Extract required data from each step output for next step
- Auto-Continue: Phase 1→2→3→4→(Summary)→5 automatically (for full pipeline entry)
- Track Progress: Update TaskCreate/TaskUpdate dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
- Task Attachment Model: Sub-tasks attached during phase, collapsed after completion
- DO NOT STOP: Continuous workflow until quality gate met or max iterations reached
- Progressive Loading: Read phase doc ONLY when that phase is about to execute
- Entry Point Routing:
workflow-test-fixskill → Phase 1-5;workflow-test-fixskill → Phase 5 only
8. Input Processing
test-fix-gen Entry (Full Pipeline)
User input → Detect type:
├─ Starts with "WFS-" → MODE=session, sourceSessionId=input
├─ Ends with ".md" → MODE=prompt, description=Read(input)
└─ Otherwise → MODE=prompt, description=inputtest-cycle-execute Entry (Phase 5 Only)
Arguments → Parse flags:
├─ --resume-session="WFS-xxx" → sessionId=WFS-xxx
├─ --max-iterations=N → maxIterations=N (default: 10)
└─ (no args) → auto-discover active test session9. Data Flow
User Input (session ID | description | file path)
↓
[Detect Mode: session | prompt]
↓
Phase 1: Session Start ─────────────────────────────────────────
↓ 1.0+1.1: session:start → testSessionId, MODE
↓
Phase 2: Test Context Gather ────────────────────────────────────
↓ 1.2: test-context-gather/context-gather → contextPath
↓
Phase 3: Test Concept Enhanced ──────────────────────────────────
↓ 1.3: test-concept-enhanced → TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
↓
Phase 4: Test Task Generate ─────────────────────────────────────
↓ 1.4: test-task-generate → IMPL_PLAN.md, IMPL-*.json, TODO_LIST.md
↓
Summary Output (inline) ─────────────────────────────────────────
↓ Display summary with next step
↓
Phase 5: Test Cycle Execution ───────────────────────────────────
↓ 2.1: Load session + tasks + iteration state
↓ 2.2: Execute IMPL-001 → 001.3 → 001.5 → 002
↓ 2.3: Fix loop (analyze → fix → retest) until pass_rate >= 95%
↓ 2.4: Completion → summary → session archive10. Summary Output (after Phase 4)
After Phase 4 completes, display the following summary before auto-continuing to Phase 5:
Test-fix workflow created successfully!
Input: [original input]
Mode: [Session|Prompt]
Test Session: [testSessionId]
Tasks Created:
- IMPL-001: Test Understanding & Generation (@code-developer)
- IMPL-001.3: Code Validation Gate - AI Error Detection (@test-fix-agent)
- IMPL-001.5: Test Quality Gate - Static Analysis & Coverage (@test-fix-agent)
- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
Quality Thresholds:
- Code Validation: Zero CRITICAL issues, zero compilation errors
- Minimum Coverage: 80% line, 70% branch
- Static Analysis: Zero critical anti-patterns
- Max Fix Iterations: 5
Review artifacts:
- Test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
- Task list: .workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
- Analysis: .workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.mdCRITICAL - Next Step: Auto-continue to Phase 5: Test Cycle Execution.
Pass testSessionId to Phase 5 for test execution pipeline. Do NOT wait for user confirmation — the unified pipeline continues automatically.
11. Test Strategy Overview
Progressive Test Layers (L0-L3):
| Layer | Name | Focus |
| L0 | Static Analysis | Compilation, imports, types, AI code issues |
| L1 | Unit Tests | Function/class behavior (happy/negative/edge cases) |
| L2 | Integration Tests | Component interactions, API contracts, failure modes |
| L3 | E2E Tests | User journeys, critical paths (optional) |
Quality Thresholds:
- Code Validation (IMPL-001.3): Zero CRITICAL issues, zero compilation errors
- Minimum Coverage: 80% line, 70% branch
- Static Analysis (IMPL-001.5): Zero critical anti-patterns
- Pass Rate Gate: >= 95% (criticality-aware) or 100%
- Max Fix Iterations: 10 (default, adjustable)
12. Strategy Engine (Phase 5)
| Strategy | Trigger | Behavior |
| Conservative | Iteration 1-2 (default) | Single targeted fix, full validation |
| Aggressive | Pass rate >80% + similar failures | Batch fix related issues |
| Surgical | Regression detected (pass rate drops >10%) | Minimal changes, rollback focus |
Selection logic and CLI fallback chain (Gemini → Qwen → Codex) are detailed in Phase 5.
13. Agent Roles
| Agent | Used In | Responsibility |
| Orchestrator | All phases | Route entry, track progress, pass context |
| @code-developer | Phase 5 (IMPL-001) | Test generation (L1-L3) |
| @test-fix-agent | Phase 5 | Test execution, code fixes, criticality assignment |
| @cli-planning-agent | Phase 5 (fix loop) | CLI analysis, root cause extraction, fix task generation |
14. TodoWrite Pattern
Core Concept: Dynamic task tracking with attachment/collapse for real-time visibility.
Implementation Note: Phase files use
TodoWritesyntax to describe the conceptual tracking pattern. At runtime, these are implemented viaTaskCreate/TaskUpdate/TaskListtools from the allowed-tools list. MapTodoWriteexamples as follows:
- Initial list creation →
TaskCreatefor each item- Status changes →
TaskUpdate({ taskId, status })- Sub-task attachment →
TaskCreate+TaskUpdate({ addBlockedBy })- Sub-task collapse →
TaskUpdate({ status: "completed" })+TaskUpdate({ status: "deleted" })for collapsed sub-items
Full Pipeline (Phase 1-5)
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Start", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Test Context Gather", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 3: Test Analysis (Gemini)", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Test Task Generate", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 5: Test Cycle Execution", "status": "pending"}
]Phase 1-4 Collapsed → Phase 5 Active
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Start", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Test Context Gather", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 3: Test Analysis (Gemini)", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Test Task Generate", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 5: Test Cycle Execution", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Execute IMPL-001 [code-developer]", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Execute IMPL-001.3 [test-fix-agent]", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Execute IMPL-001.5 [test-fix-agent]", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Execute IMPL-002 [test-fix-agent]", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Fix Loop", "status": "pending"}
]Fix Loop Iterations
[
{"content": "Phase 1-4: Test Generation", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 5: Test Cycle Execution", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Initial tasks", "status": "completed"},
{"content": " → Iteration 1: Initial test (pass: 70%, conservative)", "status": "completed"},
{"content": " → Iteration 2: Fix validation (pass: 82%, conservative)", "status": "completed"},
{"content": " → Iteration 3: Batch fix (pass: 89%, aggressive)", "status": "in_progress"}
]15. Session File Structure
.workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/
├── workflow-session.json # Session metadata
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Test generation and execution strategy
├── TODO_LIST.md # Task checklist
├── .task/
│ ├── IMPL-001.json # Test understanding & generation
│ ├── IMPL-001.3-validation.json # Code validation gate
│ ├── IMPL-001.5-review.json # Test quality gate
│ ├── IMPL-002.json # Test execution & fix cycle
│ └── IMPL-fix-{N}.json # Generated fix tasks (Phase 5 fix loop)
├── .process/
│ ├── [test-]context-package.json # Context and coverage analysis
│ ├── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md # Test requirements (L0-L3)
│ ├── iteration-state.json # Current iteration + strategy + stuck tests
│ ├── test-results.json # Latest results (pass_rate, criticality)
│ ├── test-output.log # Full test output
│ ├── fix-history.json # All fix attempts
│ ├── iteration-{N}-analysis.md # CLI analysis report
│ └── iteration-{N}-cli-output.txt
└── .summaries/
└── iteration-summaries/16. Error Handling
Phase 1-4 (Generation)
| Phase | Error Condition | Action |
| 1: Session Start | Source session not found (session mode) | Return error with session ID |
| 1: Session Start | No completed IMPL tasks (session mode) | Return error, source incomplete |
| 2: Context Gather | Context gathering failed | Return error, check source artifacts |
| 3: Analysis | Gemini analysis failed | Return error, check context package |
| 4: Task Gen | Task generation failed | Retry once, then return error |
Phase 5 (Execution)
| Scenario | Action |
| Test execution error | Log, retry with error context |
| CLI analysis failure | Fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → manual |
| Agent execution error | Save state, retry with simplified context |
| Max iterations reached | Generate failure report, mark blocked |
| Regression detected | Rollback last fix, switch to surgical strategy |
| Stuck tests detected | Continue with alternative strategy, document |
17. Commit Strategy (Phase 5)
Automatic commits at key checkpoints:
- After successful iteration (pass rate increased):
test-cycle: iteration N - strategy (pass: old% → new%) - Before rollback (regression detected):
test-cycle: rollback iteration N - regression detected
18. Completion Conditions
| Condition | Pass Rate | Action |
| Full Success | 100% | Auto-complete session |
| Partial Success | >= 95%, all failures low criticality | Auto-approve with review note |
| Failure | < 95% after max iterations | Failure report, mark blocked |
19. Post-Completion Expansion
Auto-sync: Execute /workflow:session:sync -y "{summary}" to update specs/*.md + project-tech.
After completion, ask user if they want to expand into issues (test/enhance/refactor/doc). Selected items call /issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}".
20. Coordinator Checklist
Phase 1 (session-start)
- Detect input type (session ID / description / file path)
- Initialize TaskCreate before any execution
- Read("phases/01-session-start.md"), execute Steps 1.0 + 1.1
- Parse testSessionId from step output, store in memory
Phase 2 (test-context-gather)
- Read("phases/02-test-context-gather.md"), execute Step 1.2
- Parse contextPath from step output, store in memory
Phase 3 (test-concept-enhanced)
- Read("phases/03-test-concept-enhanced.md"), execute Step 1.3
- Verify TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md created
Phase 4 (test-task-generate)
- Read("phases/04-test-task-generate.md"), execute Step 1.4
- Verify all Phase 1-4 outputs (4 task JSONs, IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md)
- Display Summary output (inline)
- Collapse Phase 1-4 tasks, auto-continue to Phase 5
Phase 5 (test-cycle-execute)
- Read("phases/05-test-cycle-execute.md")
- Load session, tasks, iteration state
- Execute initial tasks sequentially
- Calculate pass rate from test-results.json
- If pass_rate < 95%: Enter fix loop
- Track iteration count, stuck tests, regression
- If pass_rate >= 95% or max iterations: Complete
- Generate completion summary
- Offer post-completion expansion
21. Related Skills
Prerequisite Skills:
workflow-planskill orworkflow-executeskill - Complete implementation (Session Mode source)- None for Prompt Mode
Follow-up Skills:
- Display session status inline - Review workflow state
review-cycleskill - Post-implementation review/issue:new- Create follow-up issues
</process><auto_mode>
When -y or --yes is detected in $ARGUMENTS or propagated via ccw:
- Skip all AskUserQuestion confirmations
- Use default values for all workflow preferences (
workflowPreferences = { autoYes: true }) - Auto-continue through all phases without user interaction
- Phase 1→2→3→4→Summary→5 executes as a fully automatic pipeline </auto_mode>
<success_criteria>
- Input type correctly detected (session ID / description / file path)
- All 5 phases execute in sequence (full pipeline) or Phase 5 only (execute-only)
- Phase documents loaded progressively via Read() only when phase executes
- TaskCreate/TaskUpdate tracking maintained throughout with attachment/collapse pattern
- All phase outputs parsed and passed to subsequent phases (testSessionId, contextPath, etc.)
- Summary displayed after Phase 4 with all task and threshold details
- Phase 5 fix loop iterates with adaptive strategy until pass rate >= 95% or max iterations
- Completion summary generated with final pass rate and session archived
- Post-completion expansion offered to user </success_criteria>
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

