team-testing
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Unified team skill for testing team. Progressive test coverage through Generator-Critic loops, shared memory, and dynamic layer selection. Triggers on "team testing".
3 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- catlog22/Maestro-Flowedited, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- catlog22/maestro-flowedited, first seen Sep 4, 2026
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorerword for word, first seen May 8, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 45100% same
Edited · 2
- catlog22/maestro-flow★ 57172% same
- catlog22/Maestro-Flow★ 57172% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-iter-tuneSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-brainstormSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-roadmap-devSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 99
When pipeline completes, coordinator presents:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Team Testing
Orchestrate multi-agent test pipeline: strategist -> generator -> executor -> analyst. Progressive layer coverage (L1/L2/L3) with Generator-Critic loops for coverage convergence.
Architecture
Skill(skill="team-testing", args="task description")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+-------+
v v v v
[strat] [gen] [exec] [analyst]
team-worker agents, each loads roles/<role>/role.mdRole Registry
| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop |
| coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — |
| strategist | roles/strategist/role.md | STRATEGY-* | false |
| generator | roles/generator/role.md | TESTGEN-* | true |
| executor | roles/executor/role.md | TESTRUN-* | dynamic |
| analyst | roles/analyst/role.md | TESTANA-* | false |
Role Router
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
- Has
--role <name>-> Readroles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4 - No
--role->@roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router
Shared Constants
- Session prefix:
TST - Session path:
.workflow/.team/TST-<slug>-<date>/ - Team name:
testing - CLI tools:
ccw cli --mode analysis(read-only),ccw cli --mode write(modifications) - Message bus:
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)
Worker Spawn Template
Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker",
team_name: "testing",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: testing
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})User Commands
| Command | Action |
check / status | View pipeline status graph |
resume / continue | Advance to next step |
revise <TASK-ID> | Revise specific task |
feedback <text> | Inject feedback for revision |
Completion Action
When pipeline completes, coordinator presents:
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Testing pipeline complete. What would you like to do?",
header: "Completion",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Archive & Clean (Recommended)", description: "Archive session, clean up team" },
{ label: "Keep Active", description: "Keep session for follow-up work" },
{ label: "Deepen Coverage", description: "Add more test layers or increase coverage targets" }
]
}]
})Session Directory
.workflow/.team/TST-<slug>-<date>/
├── .msg/messages.jsonl # Team message bus
├── .msg/meta.json # Session metadata
├── wisdom/ # Cross-task knowledge
├── strategy/ # Strategist output
├── tests/ # Generator output (L1-unit/, L2-integration/, L3-e2e/)
├── results/ # Executor output
└── analysis/ # Analyst outputSpecs Reference
- specs/pipelines.md — Pipeline definitions and task registry
- specs/team-config.json — Team configuration
Error Handling
| Scenario | Resolution |
| Unknown --role value | Error with available role list |
| Role not found | Error with expected path (roles/<name>/role.md) |
| CLI tool fails | Worker fallback to direct implementation |
| GC loop exceeded | Accept current coverage with warning |
| Fast-advance conflict | Coordinator reconciles on next callback |
| Completion action fails | Default to Keep Active |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

