workflow-lite-execute
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Lightweight execution engine - multi-mode input, task grouping, batch execution, chain to workflow-lite-test-review
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-exploreredited, first seen May 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 4595% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-iter-tuneSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-brainstormSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-roadmap-devSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-testingSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 274
Never merge independent tasks into one CLI prompt
- Very specific: line 503
After workflow-lite-test-review returns: Ask user whether to expand into issues (enhance/refactor/doc).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Workflow-Lite-Execute
Execution engine for workflow-lite-plan handoff and standalone task execution.
Usage
<input> Task description string, or path to file (required)| Flag | Description |
--in-memory | Mode 1: Use executionContext from workflow-lite-plan handoff (via Skill({ skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory" }) |
Input Modes
Mode 1: In-Memory Plan
Trigger: --in-memory flag or executionContext global variable available
Input Source: executionContext global variable set by workflow-lite-plan
Behavior: Skip execution method/code review selection (already chosen in LP-Phase 4), directly proceed with full context (exploration, clarifications, plan artifacts all available)
Note: LP-Phase 4 is the single confirmation gate. Mode 1 invocation means user already approved — no further prompts.
Mode 2: Prompt Description
Trigger: User calls with task description string (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
Behavior: Store prompt as originalUserInput → create simple execution plan → run selectExecutionOptions() → proceed
Mode 3: File Content
Trigger: User calls with file path (ends with .md/.json/.txt)
fileContent = Read(filePath)
try {
jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
// plan.json detection: two-layer format with task_ids[]
if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.task_ids) {
planObject = jsonData
originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
isPlanJson = true
const planDir = filePath.replace(/[/\\][^/\\]+$/, '')
planObject._loadedTasks = loadTaskFiles(planDir, jsonData.task_ids)
} else {
originalUserInput = fileContent
isPlanJson = false
}
} catch {
originalUserInput = fileContent
isPlanJson = false
}isPlanJson === true: UseplanObjectdirectly → runselectExecutionOptions()isPlanJson === false: Treat as prompt (same as Mode 2)
User Selection (Mode 2/3 shared)
function selectExecutionOptions() {
// autoYes: set by -y flag (standalone only; Mode 1 never reaches here)
const autoYes = workflowPreferences?.autoYes ?? false
if (autoYes) {
return { execution_method: "Auto", code_review_tool: "Skip", convergence_review_tool: "Skip" }
}
return AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "Select execution method:",
header: "Execution",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
{ label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
{ label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
]
},
{
question: "Code review after execution? (runs here in lite-execute)",
header: "Code Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI: git diff quality review" },
{ label: "Codex Review", description: "Codex CLI: prompt-based code quality review (--mode analysis)" },
{ label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer agent" },
{ label: "Skip", description: "No code review" }
]
},
{
question: "Convergence review in workflow-lite-test-review phase?",
header: "Convergence Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Agent", description: "Agent: verify convergence criteria" },
{ label: "Gemini", description: "Gemini CLI: convergence verification" },
{ label: "Codex", description: "Codex CLI: convergence verification" },
{ label: "Skip", description: "Skip convergence review, run tests only" }
]
}
]
})
}Execution Steps
Step 1: Initialize & Echo Strategy
previousExecutionResults = []
// Mode 1: echo strategy for transparency
if (executionContext) {
console.log(`
Execution Strategy (from lite-plan):
Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod}
Code Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool}
Convergence Review: ${executionContext.convergenceReviewTool}
Tasks: ${getTasks(executionContext.planObject).length}
Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity}
${executionContext.executorAssignments ? ` Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''}
`)
}
// Helper: load .task/*.json files (two-layer format)
function loadTaskFiles(planDir, taskIds) {
return taskIds.map(id => JSON.parse(Read(`${planDir}/.task/${id}.json`)))
}
function getTasks(planObject) {
return planObject._loadedTasks || []
}Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation
// Dependency extraction: explicit depends_on only (no file/keyword inference)
function extractDependencies(tasks) {
const taskIdToIndex = {}
tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
return tasks.map((task, i) => {
const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
.map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
.filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
})
}
// Executor resolution: executorAssignments[taskId] > executionMethod > Auto fallback
function getTaskExecutor(task) {
const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
if (assignments[task.id]) return assignments[task.id].executor // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex' // Auto fallback
}
function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
tasks.forEach(task => { groups[getTaskExecutor(task)].push(task) })
return groups
}
// Batch creation: independent → per-executor parallel, dependent → sequential phases
function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
const processed = new Set()
const calls = []
// Phase 1: Independent tasks → per-executor parallel batches
const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(independentTasks)
let parallelIndex = 1
for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) {
if (tasks.length === 0) continue
tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel",
groupId: `P${parallelIndex++}`,
taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks
})
}
}
// Phase 2+: Dependent tasks → respect dependency order
let sequentialIndex = 1
let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
while (remaining.length > 0) {
let ready = remaining.filter(t => t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d)))
if (ready.length === 0) { console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining'); ready = [...remaining] }
if (ready.length > 1) {
const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(ready)
for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) {
if (tasks.length === 0) continue
tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel",
groupId: `P${calls.length + 1}`,
taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks
})
}
} else {
ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod, executor: getTaskExecutor(ready[0]),
executionType: "sequential", groupId: `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
taskSummary: ready[0].title, tasks: ready
})
}
remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
}
return calls
}
executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(getTasks(planObject), executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
TodoWrite({
todos: executionCalls.map((c, i) => ({
content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : `→ [${i+1}/${executionCalls.filter(x=>x.executionType==="sequential").length}]`} ${c.id} [${c.executor}] ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}`,
status: "pending",
activeForm: `Waiting: ${c.tasks.length} task(s) via ${c.executor}`
}))
})Step 3: Launch Execution & Track Progress
CHECKPOINT: Verify Phase 2 execution protocol (Step 3-5) is in active memory. If only a summary remains, re-read
phases/02-lite-execute.mdnow.
Batch Routing (by batch.executor field):
function executeBatch(batch) {
const executor = batch.executor || getTaskExecutor(batch.tasks[0])
const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
const fixedId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`
if (executor === 'agent') {
return Agent({ subagent_type: "code-developer", run_in_background: false,
description: batch.taskSummary, prompt: buildExecutionPrompt(batch) })
} else {
// CLI execution (codex/gemini): background with fixed ID
const tool = executor // 'codex' | 'gemini'
const mode = executor === 'gemini' ? 'analysis' : 'write'
const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
const cmd = previousCliId
? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
: `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId}`
return Bash(cmd, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for task hook callback
}
}Parallel execution rules:
- Each batch = one independent CLI instance or Agent call
- Parallel = multiple Bash(run_in_background=true) or multiple Agent() in single message
- Never merge independent tasks into one CLI prompt
- Agent: run_in_background=false, but multiple Agent() calls can be concurrent in single message
Execution Flow: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")
// Phase 1: All parallel batches (single message, multiple tool calls)
if (parallel.length > 0) {
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending",
activeForm: c.executionType === "parallel" ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : `Blocked by parallel phase`
})) })
parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending",
activeForm: parallel.includes(c) ? `Done [${c.executor}]` : `Ready`
})) })
}
// Phase 2: Sequential batches one by one
for (const call of sequential) {
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: c === call ? "in_progress" : (c.status === "completed" ? "completed" : "pending"),
activeForm: c === call ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : undefined
})) })
result = await executeBatch(call)
previousExecutionResults.push(result)
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: sequential.indexOf(c) <= sequential.indexOf(call) ? "completed" : "pending"
})) })
}Resume on Failure:
if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
// fixedId = `${sessionId}-${groupId}` (predictable, no auto-generated timestamps)
console.log(`Execution incomplete. Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume ${fixedId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedId}-retry`)
batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedId
}Progress tracked at batch level. Icons: ⚡ parallel (concurrent), → sequential (one-by-one).
Unified Task Prompt Builder
Each task is a self-contained checklist. Same template for Agent and CLI.
function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
const formatTask = (t) => `
## ${t.title}
**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\` | **Action**: ${t.action}
### Files
${(t.files || []).map(f => `- **${f.path}** → \`${f.target || ''}\`: ${f.change || (f.changes || []).join(', ') || ''}`).join('\n')}
${t.rationale ? `### Why this approach (Medium/High)
${t.rationale.chosen_approach}
${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `Key factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `Tradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}` : ''}
### How to do it
${t.description}
${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
${t.code_skeleton ? `### Code skeleton (High)
${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}` : ''}
### Reference
- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}
${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `### Risk mitigations (High)
${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}` : ''}
### Done when
${(t.convergence?.criteria || []).map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
${(t.test?.success_metrics || []).length > 0 ? `**Success metrics**: ${t.test.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}`
const sections = []
if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)
const context = []
if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0)
context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
if (clarificationContext)
context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram)
context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`)
if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan)
context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n(Loaded via ccw spec load --category planning)`)
if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)
sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
return sections.join('\n\n')
}Step 4: Code Review
Skip if: codeReviewTool === 'Skip'
Resolve review tool: From executionContext.codeReviewTool (Mode 1) or userSelection.code_review_tool (Mode 2/3).
const codeReviewTool = executionContext?.codeReviewTool || userSelection?.code_review_tool || 'Skip'
const resolvedTool = (() => {
if (!codeReviewTool || codeReviewTool === 'Skip') return 'skip'
if (/gemini/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'gemini'
if (/codex/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'codex'
return 'agent'
})()
if (resolvedTool === 'skip') {
console.log('[Code Review] Skipped')
} else {
// proceed with review
}Agent Code Review (resolvedTool === 'agent'):
Agent({
subagent_type: "code-reviewer",
run_in_background: false,
description: `Code review: ${planObject.summary}`,
prompt: `## Code Review — Post-Execution Quality Check
**Goal**: ${originalUserInput}
**Plan Summary**: ${planObject.summary}
### Changed Files
Run \`git diff --name-only HEAD~${getTasks(planObject).length}..HEAD\` to identify changes.
### Review Focus
1. **Code quality**: Readability, naming, structure, dead code
2. **Correctness**: Logic errors, off-by-one, null handling, edge cases
3. **Patterns**: Consistency with existing codebase conventions
4. **Security**: Injection, XSS, auth bypass, secrets exposure
5. **Performance**: Unnecessary loops, N+1 queries, missing indexes
### Instructions
1. Run git diff to see actual changes
2. Read changed files for full context
3. For each issue found: severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) + file:line + description + fix suggestion
4. Return structured review: issues[], summary, overall verdict (PASS/WARN/FAIL)`
})CLI Code Review — Codex (resolvedTool === 'codex'):
const reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review`
Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary}
TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality
EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool codex --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for hook callbackCLI Code Review — Gemini (resolvedTool === 'gemini'):
const reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review`
Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary}
TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality
EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for hook callbackWrite review artifact (if session folder exists):
if (executionContext?.session?.folder) {
Write(`${executionContext.session.folder}/code-review.md`, codeReviewOutput)
}Step 5: Chain to Test Review & Post-Completion
Resolve convergence review tool: From executionContext.convergenceReviewTool (Mode 1) or userSelection.convergence_review_tool (Mode 2/3).
function resolveConvergenceTool(ctx, selection) {
const raw = ctx?.convergenceReviewTool || selection?.convergence_review_tool || 'skip'
if (!raw || raw === 'Skip') return 'skip'
if (/gemini/i.test(raw)) return 'gemini'
if (/codex/i.test(raw)) return 'codex'
return 'agent'
}Build testReviewContext and handoff:
testReviewContext = {
planObject: planObject,
taskFiles: executionContext?.taskFiles
|| getTasks(planObject).map(t => ({ id: t.id, path: `${executionContext?.session?.folder}/.task/${t.id}.json` })),
convergenceReviewTool: resolveConvergenceTool(executionContext, userSelection),
executionResults: previousExecutionResults,
originalUserInput: originalUserInput,
session: executionContext?.session || {
id: 'standalone',
folder: executionContext?.session?.folder || '.',
artifacts: { plan: null, task_dir: null }
}
}
// Chain to workflow-lite-test-review (Mode 1: In-Memory)
Skill("workflow-lite-test-review")
// testReviewContext passed as global variableAfter workflow-lite-test-review returns: Ask user whether to expand into issues (enhance/refactor/doc). Selected items call /issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}".
Error Handling
| Error | Resolution |
| Missing executionContext | "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." |
| File not found | "File not found: {path}. Check file path." |
| Empty file | "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
| Invalid plan JSON | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
| Malformed JSON | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
| Execution failure | Use fixed ID ${sessionId}-${groupId} for resume |
| Execution timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
| Codex unavailable | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
| Fixed ID not found | Check ccw cli history, verify date directories |
Data Structures
executionContext (Input - Mode 1)
{
planObject: {
summary: string,
approach: string,
task_ids: string[],
task_count: number,
_loadedTasks: [...], // populated at runtime from .task/*.json
estimated_time: string,
recommended_execution: string,
complexity: string
},
taskFiles: [{id: string, path: string}] | null,
explorationsContext: {...} | null,
explorationAngles: string[],
explorationManifest: {...} | null,
clarificationContext: {...} | null,
executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",
codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Codex Review" | "Agent Review",
convergenceReviewTool: "Skip" | "Agent" | "Gemini" | "Codex",
originalUserInput: string,
executorAssignments: { // per-task override, priority over executionMethod
[taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
},
session: {
id: string, // {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
folder: string, // .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
artifacts: {
explorations: [{angle, path}],
explorations_manifest: string,
plan: string // always present
}
}
}executionResult (Output)
{
executionId: string, // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
tasksSummary: string,
completionSummary: string,
keyOutputs: string,
notes: string,
fixedCliId: string | null // for resume: ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
}
// Appended to previousExecutionResults[] for context continuityDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

