security-audit
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
OWASP Top 10 and STRIDE security auditing with supply chain analysis. Triggers on "security audit", "security scan", "cso".
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- argos-ci/argostheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- classroomio/classroomiotheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dio-az/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roke22/Squadratheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- qwwiwi/agentos-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- craigcossairt/trellistheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +7 more from lilangMax
- +1 more from nicepkg
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 45100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- ruvnet/claude-flow★ 80ksame name
- ruvnet/ruflo★ 79ksame name
- PostHog/posthog★ 40ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- cloudflare/security-audit-skill★ 18ksame name
- rommapp/romm★ 14ksame name
- kubeshark/kubeshark★ 12ksame name
- maximhq/bifrost★ 9.4ksame name
- mono/SkiaSharp★ 5.6ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-iter-tuneSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-brainstormSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-roadmap-devSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-testingSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 50
Run Phase 1 only. Must score >= 8/10 to pass.
- Distinctive: line 54
Run all 4 phases sequentially.
- Distinctive: line 120
DONE: All phases completed, score calculated, report generated
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Security Audit
4-phase security audit covering supply chain risks, OWASP Top 10 code review, STRIDE threat modeling, and trend-tracked reporting. Produces structured JSON findings in .workflow/.security/.
Architecture Overview
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Phase 1: Supply Chain Scan |
| -> Dependency audit, secrets detection, CI/CD review, LLM risks |
| -> Output: supply-chain-report.json |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
| Phase 2: OWASP Review |
| -> OWASP Top 10 2021 code-level analysis via ccw cli |
| -> Output: owasp-findings.json |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
| Phase 3: Threat Modeling (STRIDE) |
| -> 6 threat categories mapped to architecture components |
| -> Output: threat-model.json |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
| Phase 4: Report & Tracking |
| -> Score calculation, trend comparison, dated report |
| -> Output: .workflow/.security/audit-report-{date}.json |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+Key Design Principles
- Infrastructure-first: Phase 1 catches low-hanging fruit (leaked secrets, vulnerable deps) before deeper analysis
- Standards-based: OWASP Top 10 2021 and STRIDE provide systematic coverage
- Scoring gates: Daily quick-scan must score 8/10; comprehensive audit minimum 2/10 for initial baseline
- Trend tracking: Each audit compares against prior results in
.workflow/.security/
Execution Flow
Quick-Scan Mode (daily)
Run Phase 1 only. Must score >= 8/10 to pass.
Comprehensive Mode (full audit)
Run all 4 phases sequentially. Initial baseline minimum 2/10.
Phase Sequence
- Phase 1: Supply Chain Scan -- phases/01-supply-chain-scan.md
- Dependency audit (npm audit / pip-audit / safety check)
- Secrets detection (API keys, tokens, passwords in source)
- CI/CD config review (injection risks in workflow YAML)
- LLM/AI prompt injection check
- Phase 2: OWASP Review -- phases/02-owasp-review.md
- Systematic OWASP Top 10 2021 code review
- Uses
ccw cli --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-assess-security-risks
- Phase 3: Threat Modeling -- phases/03-threat-modeling.md
- STRIDE threat model mapped to architecture components
- Trust boundary identification and attack surface assessment
- Phase 4: Report & Tracking -- phases/04-report-tracking.md
- Score calculation with severity weights
- Trend comparison with previous audits
- Date-stamped report to
.workflow/.security/
Scoring Overview
See specs/scoring-gates.md for full specification.
| Severity | Weight | Example |
| Critical | 10 | RCE, SQL injection, leaked credentials |
| High | 7 | Broken auth, SSRF, privilege escalation |
| Medium | 4 | XSS, CSRF, verbose error messages |
| Low | 1 | Missing headers, informational disclosures |
Gates: Daily quick-scan >= 8/10, Comprehensive initial >= 2/10.
Directory Setup
mkdir -p .workflow/.security
WORK_DIR=".workflow/.security"Output Structure
.workflow/.security/
audit-report-{YYYY-MM-DD}.json # Dated audit report
supply-chain-report.json # Latest supply chain scan
owasp-findings.json # Latest OWASP findings
threat-model.json # Latest STRIDE threat modelReference Documents
| Document | Purpose |
| phases/01-supply-chain-scan.md | Dependency, secrets, CI/CD, LLM risk scan |
| phases/02-owasp-review.md | OWASP Top 10 2021 code review |
| phases/03-threat-modeling.md | STRIDE threat modeling |
| phases/04-report-tracking.md | Report generation and trend tracking |
| specs/scoring-gates.md | Scoring system and quality gates |
| specs/owasp-checklist.md | OWASP Top 10 detection patterns |
Completion Status Protocol
This skill follows the Completion Status Protocol defined in _shared/SKILL-DESIGN-SPEC.md sections 13-14.
Possible termination statuses:
- DONE: All phases completed, score calculated, report generated
- DONE_WITH_CONCERNS: Audit completed but findings exceed acceptable thresholds
- BLOCKED: Required tools unavailable (e.g., npm/pip not installed), permission denied
- NEEDS_CONTEXT: Ambiguous project scope, unclear trust boundaries
Escalation follows the Three-Strike Rule (section 14) per step.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

