agentleFS
catlog22catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/skills/security-audit/SKILL.md

security-audit

Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub

OWASP Top 10 and STRIDE security auditing with supply chain analysis. Triggers on "security audit", "security scan", "cso".

192 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lilangMaxSkill

    create-stories

    Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    story-done

    End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +7 more from lilangMax
  • +1 more from nicepkg

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run Phase 1 only. Must score >= 8/10 to pass.

    line 50
  2. Distinctive:

    Run all 4 phases sequentially.

    line 54
  3. Distinctive:

    DONE: All phases completed, score calculated, report generated

    line 120

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Security Audit

4-phase security audit covering supply chain risks, OWASP Top 10 code review, STRIDE threat modeling, and trend-tracked reporting. Produces structured JSON findings in .workflow/.security/.

Architecture Overview

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Phase 1: Supply Chain Scan                                       |
|  -> Dependency audit, secrets detection, CI/CD review, LLM risks  |
|  -> Output: supply-chain-report.json                              |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
                                    |
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
|  Phase 2: OWASP Review                                           |
|  -> OWASP Top 10 2021 code-level analysis via ccw cli            |
|  -> Output: owasp-findings.json                                  |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
                                    |
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
|  Phase 3: Threat Modeling (STRIDE)                                |
|  -> 6 threat categories mapped to architecture components         |
|  -> Output: threat-model.json                                    |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
                                    |
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
|  Phase 4: Report & Tracking                                      |
|  -> Score calculation, trend comparison, dated report             |
|  -> Output: .workflow/.security/audit-report-{date}.json         |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Key Design Principles

  1. Infrastructure-first: Phase 1 catches low-hanging fruit (leaked secrets, vulnerable deps) before deeper analysis
  2. Standards-based: OWASP Top 10 2021 and STRIDE provide systematic coverage
  3. Scoring gates: Daily quick-scan must score 8/10; comprehensive audit minimum 2/10 for initial baseline
  4. Trend tracking: Each audit compares against prior results in .workflow/.security/

Execution Flow

Quick-Scan Mode (daily)

Run Phase 1 only. Must score >= 8/10 to pass.

Comprehensive Mode (full audit)

Run all 4 phases sequentially. Initial baseline minimum 2/10.

Phase Sequence

  1. Phase 1: Supply Chain Scan -- phases/01-supply-chain-scan.md
    • Dependency audit (npm audit / pip-audit / safety check)
    • Secrets detection (API keys, tokens, passwords in source)
    • CI/CD config review (injection risks in workflow YAML)
    • LLM/AI prompt injection check
  2. Phase 2: OWASP Review -- phases/02-owasp-review.md
    • Systematic OWASP Top 10 2021 code review
    • Uses ccw cli --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-assess-security-risks
  3. Phase 3: Threat Modeling -- phases/03-threat-modeling.md
    • STRIDE threat model mapped to architecture components
    • Trust boundary identification and attack surface assessment
  4. Phase 4: Report & Tracking -- phases/04-report-tracking.md
    • Score calculation with severity weights
    • Trend comparison with previous audits
    • Date-stamped report to .workflow/.security/

Scoring Overview

See specs/scoring-gates.md for full specification.

SeverityWeightExample
Critical10RCE, SQL injection, leaked credentials
High7Broken auth, SSRF, privilege escalation
Medium4XSS, CSRF, verbose error messages
Low1Missing headers, informational disclosures

Gates: Daily quick-scan >= 8/10, Comprehensive initial >= 2/10.

Directory Setup

mkdir -p .workflow/.security
WORK_DIR=".workflow/.security"

Output Structure

.workflow/.security/
  audit-report-{YYYY-MM-DD}.json    # Dated audit report
  supply-chain-report.json           # Latest supply chain scan
  owasp-findings.json                # Latest OWASP findings
  threat-model.json                  # Latest STRIDE threat model

Reference Documents

DocumentPurpose
phases/01-supply-chain-scan.mdDependency, secrets, CI/CD, LLM risk scan
phases/02-owasp-review.mdOWASP Top 10 2021 code review
phases/03-threat-modeling.mdSTRIDE threat modeling
phases/04-report-tracking.mdReport generation and trend tracking
specs/scoring-gates.mdScoring system and quality gates
specs/owasp-checklist.mdOWASP Top 10 detection patterns

Completion Status Protocol

This skill follows the Completion Status Protocol defined in _shared/SKILL-DESIGN-SPEC.md sections 13-14.

Possible termination statuses:

  • DONE: All phases completed, score calculated, report generated
  • DONE_WITH_CONCERNS: Audit completed but findings exceed acceptable thresholds
  • BLOCKED: Required tools unavailable (e.g., npm/pip not installed), permission denied
  • NEEDS_CONTEXT: Ambiguous project scope, unclear trust boundaries

Escalation follows the Three-Strike Rule (section 14) per step.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.