team-brainstorm
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Unified team skill for brainstorming team. Uses team-worker agent architecture with role directories for domain logic. Coordinator orchestrates pipeline, workers are team-worker agents. Triggers on "team brainstorm".
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- github/plugin-marketplace-startertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rjain/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 17, 2026
- andeya/team-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 27, 2026
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorerword for word, first seen May 8, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 45100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- andeya/team-skills★ 4same name
- github/plugin-marketplace-starter★ 1same name
- rjain/claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-iter-tuneSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-roadmap-devSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-testingSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 88
When Full pipeline has N parallel IDEA tasks, spawn N distinct team-worker agents named ideator-1, ideator-2, etc.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Team Brainstorm
Orchestrate multi-agent brainstorming: generate ideas → challenge assumptions → synthesize → evaluate. Supports Quick, Deep, and Full pipelines with Generator-Critic loop.
Architecture
Skill(skill="team-brainstorm", args="topic description")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- analyze → dispatch → spawn workers → STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+
v v v v
[ideator][challenger][synthesizer][evaluator]Role Registry
| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop |
| coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — |
| ideator | roles/ideator/role.md | IDEA-* | false |
| challenger | roles/challenger/role.md | CHALLENGE-* | false |
| synthesizer | roles/synthesizer/role.md | SYNTH-* | false |
| evaluator | roles/evaluator/role.md | EVAL-* | false |
Role Router
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
- Has
--role <name>→ Readroles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4 - No
--role→@roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router
Shared Constants
- Session prefix:
BRS - Session path:
.workflow/.team/BRS-<slug>-<date>/ - CLI tools:
ccw cli --mode analysis(read-only),ccw cli --mode write(modifications) - Message bus:
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)
Worker Spawn Template
Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker",
team_name: "brainstorm",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: brainstorm
requirement: <topic-description>
inner_loop: false
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})Parallel ideator spawn (Full pipeline with N angles):
When Full pipeline has N parallel IDEA tasks, spawn N distinct team-worker agents named ideator-1, ideator-2, etc.
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
name: "ideator-<N>",
team_name: "brainstorm",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: ideator
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/ideator/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: brainstorm
requirement: <topic-description>
agent_name: ideator-<N>
inner_loop: false
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/ideator/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery, owner=ideator-<N>) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})User Commands
| Command | Action |
check / status | View execution status graph, no advancement |
resume / continue | Check worker states, advance next step |
Session Directory
.workflow/.team/BRS-<slug>-<date>/
├── session.json # Session metadata + pipeline + gc_round
├── task-analysis.json # Coordinator analyze output
├── .msg/
│ ├── messages.jsonl # Message bus log
│ └── meta.json # Session state + cross-role state
├── wisdom/ # Cross-task knowledge
│ ├── learnings.md
│ ├── decisions.md
│ ├── conventions.md
│ └── issues.md
├── ideas/ # Ideator output
│ ├── idea-001.md
│ └── idea-002.md
├── critiques/ # Challenger output
│ ├── critique-001.md
│ └── critique-002.md
├── synthesis/ # Synthesizer output
│ └── synthesis-001.md
└── evaluation/ # Evaluator output
└── evaluation-001.mdSpecs Reference
- specs/pipelines.md — Pipeline definitions and task registry
Error Handling
| Scenario | Resolution |
| Unknown command | Error with available command list |
| Role not found | Error with role registry |
| CLI tool fails | Worker fallback to direct implementation |
| Fast-advance conflict | Coordinator reconciles on next callback |
| Completion action fails | Default to Keep Active |
| Generator-Critic loop exceeds 2 rounds | Force convergence to synthesizer |
| No ideas generated | Coordinator prompts with seed questions |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

