agentleFS
catlog22catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/skills/team-perf-opt/SKILL.md

team-perf-opt

Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub

Unified team skill for performance optimization. Coordinator orchestrates pipeline, workers are team-worker agents. Supports single/fan-out/independent parallel modes. Triggers on "team perf-opt".

3 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When the pipeline completes:

    line 135

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Team Performance Optimization

Profile application performance, identify bottlenecks, design optimization strategies, implement changes, benchmark improvements, and review code quality.

Architecture

Skill(skill="team-perf-opt", args="<task-description>")
                    |
         SKILL.md (this file) = Router
                    |
     +--------------+--------------+
     |                             |
  no --role flag              --role <name>
     |                             |
  Coordinator                  Worker
  roles/coordinator/role.md    roles/<name>/role.md
     |
     +-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
                                    |
                    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                    v       v       v       v       v
                 [profiler] [strategist] [optimizer] [benchmarker] [reviewer]
                 (team-worker agents)

Pipeline (Single mode):
  PROFILE-001 -> STRATEGY-001 -> IMPL-001 -> BENCH-001 + REVIEW-001 (fix cycle)

Pipeline (Fan-out mode):
  PROFILE-001 -> STRATEGY-001 -> [IMPL-B01..N](parallel) -> BENCH+REVIEW per branch

Pipeline (Independent mode):
  [Pipeline A: PROFILE-A->STRATEGY-A->IMPL-A->BENCH-A+REVIEW-A]
  [Pipeline B: PROFILE-B->STRATEGY-B->IMPL-B->BENCH-B+REVIEW-B] (parallel)

Role Registry

RolePathPrefixInner Loop
coordinatorroles/coordinator/role.md——
profilerroles/profiler/role.mdPROFILE-*false
strategistroles/strategist/role.mdSTRATEGY-*false
optimizerroles/optimizer/role.mdIMPL-, FIX-true
benchmarkerroles/benchmarker/role.mdBENCH-*false
reviewerroles/reviewer/role.mdREVIEW-, QUALITY-false

Role Router

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

  • Has --role <name> → Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4
  • No --role → @roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router

Shared Constants

  • Session prefix: PERF-OPT
  • Session path: .workflow/.team/PERF-OPT-<slug>-<date>/
  • Team name: perf-opt
  • CLI tools: ccw cli --mode analysis (read-only), ccw cli --mode write (modifications)
  • Message bus: mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)

Worker Spawn Template

Coordinator spawns workers using this template:

Agent({
  subagent_type: "team-worker",
  description: "Spawn <role> worker",
  team_name: "perf-opt",
  name: "<role>",
  run_in_background: true,
  prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: perf-opt
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>

## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.

Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})

Inner Loop roles (optimizer): Set inner_loop dynamically — true for single mode, false for fan-out/independent (parallel branches). Single-task roles (profiler, strategist, benchmarker, reviewer): Set inner_loop: false.

User Commands

CommandAction
check / statusOutput execution status graph (branch-grouped), no advancement
resume / continueCheck worker states, advance next step
revise <TASK-ID> [feedback]Create revision task + cascade downstream (scoped to branch)
feedback <text>Analyze feedback impact, create targeted revision chain
recheckRe-run quality check
improve [dimension]Auto-improve weakest dimension

Session Directory

.workflow/.team/PERF-OPT-<slug>-<date>/
+-- session.json                    # Session metadata + status + parallel_mode
+-- artifacts/
|   +-- baseline-metrics.json       # Profiler: before-optimization metrics
|   +-- bottleneck-report.md        # Profiler: ranked bottleneck findings
|   +-- optimization-plan.md        # Strategist: prioritized optimization plan
|   +-- benchmark-results.json      # Benchmarker: after-optimization metrics
|   +-- review-report.md            # Reviewer: code review findings
|   +-- branches/B01/...            # Fan-out branch artifacts
|   +-- pipelines/A/...             # Independent pipeline artifacts
+-- explorations/                   # Shared explore cache
+-- wisdom/patterns.md              # Discovered patterns and conventions
+-- discussions/                    # Discussion records
+-- .msg/messages.jsonl             # Team message bus
+-- .msg/meta.json                  # Session metadata

Completion Action

When the pipeline completes:

AskUserQuestion({
  questions: [{
    question: "Team pipeline complete. What would you like to do?",
    header: "Completion",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Archive & Clean (Recommended)", description: "Archive session, clean up tasks and team resources" },
      { label: "Keep Active", description: "Keep session active for follow-up work or inspection" },
      { label: "Export Results", description: "Export deliverables to a specified location, then clean" }
    ]
  }]
})

Specs Reference

  • specs/pipelines.md — Pipeline definitions and task registry
  • specs/team-config.json — Team configuration

Error Handling

ScenarioResolution
Unknown --role valueError with role registry list
Role file not foundError with expected path (roles/{name}/role.md)
Profiling tool not availableFallback to static analysis methods
Benchmark regression detectedAuto-create FIX task with regression details
Review-fix cycle exceeds 3 iterationsEscalate to user
One branch IMPL failsMark that branch failed, other branches continue
Fast-advance conflictCoordinator reconciles on next callback
Completion action failsDefault to Keep Active

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.