agentleFS
catlog22catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/skills/investigate/SKILL.md

investigate

Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub

Systematic debugging with Iron Law methodology. 5-phase investigation from evidence collection to verified fix. Triggers on "investigate", "debug", "root cause".

129 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use pair-agent, plan-devex-review and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • seek888Skill

    pair-agent

    Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    plan-devex-review

    Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".

    Also in 13 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • ayudaySkill

    setup-deploy

    Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • ayudaySkill

    cso

    Chief Security Officer mode. Performs OWASP Top 10 audit, STRIDE threat modeling, attack surface analysis, auth flow verification, secret detection, dependency CVE scanning, supply chain risk assessment, and data classification review. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".

    Also in 17 projects that use this

  • ramybarsoumSkill

    document-release

    Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.

    Also in 18 projects that use this

  • +1 more from seek888

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 115 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No fix without confirmed root cause: Every investigation follows a strict evidence chain:

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Verify fix and generate structured report

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    3-Strike Escalation: If 3 consecutive hypothesis tests fail, STOP and escalate with a diagnostic dump.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Regression Coverage: Every fix must include a test that fails without the fix and passes with it.

    line 27
  5. Distinctive:

    Structured Output: All findings are recorded in machine-readable JSON for future reference.

    line 28
  6. Very specific:

    All CLI calls use --mode analysis (read-only).

    line 110

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 115 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Investigate

Systematic debugging skill that enforces the Iron Law: never fix without a confirmed root cause. Produces a structured debug report with full evidence chain, minimal fix, and regression test.

Iron Law Principle

No fix without confirmed root cause. Every investigation follows a strict evidence chain:

  1. Reproduce the bug with concrete evidence
  2. Analyze patterns to assess scope
  3. Form and test hypotheses (max 3 strikes)
  4. Implement minimal fix ONLY after root cause is confirmed
  5. Verify fix and generate structured report

Violation of the Iron Law (skipping to Phase 4 without Phase 3 confirmation) is prohibited.

Key Design Principles

  1. Evidence-First: Collect before theorizing. Logs, stack traces, and reproduction steps are mandatory inputs.
  2. Minimal Fix: Change only what is necessary. Refactoring is not debugging.
  3. 3-Strike Escalation: If 3 consecutive hypothesis tests fail, STOP and escalate with a diagnostic dump.
  4. Regression Coverage: Every fix must include a test that fails without the fix and passes with it.
  5. Structured Output: All findings are recorded in machine-readable JSON for future reference.

Execution Flow

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
  Reproduce bug, collect evidence (errors, logs, traces)
  Use ccw cli --tool gemini --mode analysis for initial diagnosis
  Output: investigation-report.json
      |
      v
Phase 2: Pattern Analysis
  Search codebase for similar patterns (same error, module, antipattern)
  Assess scope: isolated vs systemic
  Output: pattern-analysis section in report
      |
      v
Phase 3: Hypothesis Testing
  Form max 3 hypotheses from evidence
  Test each with minimal read-only probes
  3-strike rule: STOP and escalate on 3 consecutive failures
  Output: confirmed root cause with evidence chain
      |
      v
Phase 4: Implementation  [GATE: requires Phase 3 confirmed root cause]
  Implement minimal fix
  Add regression test
  Verify fix resolves reproduction case
      |
      v
Phase 5: Verification & Report
  Run full test suite
  Check for regressions
  Generate structured debug report to .workflow/.debug/

Directory Setup

mkdir -p .workflow/.debug

Output Structure

.workflow/.debug/
  debug-report-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{slug}.json    # Structured debug report

Completion Status Protocol

This skill follows the Completion Status Protocol defined in _shared/SKILL-DESIGN-SPEC.md sections 13-14.

StatusWhen
DONERoot cause confirmed, fix applied, regression test passes, no regressions
DONE_WITH_CONCERNSFix applied but partial test coverage or minor warnings
BLOCKEDCannot reproduce bug, or 3-strike escalation triggered in Phase 3
NEEDS_CONTEXTMissing reproduction steps, unclear error conditions

Reference Documents

DocumentPurpose
phases/01-root-cause-investigation.mdEvidence collection and reproduction
phases/02-pattern-analysis.mdCodebase pattern search and scope assessment
phases/03-hypothesis-testing.mdHypothesis formation, testing, and 3-strike rule
phases/04-implementation.mdMinimal fix with Iron Law gate
phases/05-verification-report.mdTest suite, regression check, report generation
specs/iron-law.mdIron Law rules definition
specs/debug-report-format.mdStructured debug report JSON schema

CLI Integration

This skill leverages ccw cli for multi-model analysis at key points:

PhaseCLI UsageMode
Phase 1Initial diagnosis from error evidence--mode analysis
Phase 2Cross-file pattern search--mode analysis
Phase 3Hypothesis validation assistance--mode analysis

All CLI calls use --mode analysis (read-only). No write-mode CLI calls during investigation phases 1-3.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.