skill-iter-tune
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Iterative skill tuning via execute-evaluate-improve feedback loop. Uses ccw cli Claude to execute skill, Gemini to evaluate quality, and Agent to apply improvements. Iterates until quality threshold or max iterations. Triggers on "skill iter tune", "iterative skill tuning", "tune skill".
3 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- catlog22/Maestro-Flowedited, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- catlog22/maestro-flowedited, first seen Sep 4, 2026
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorerword for word, first seen May 8, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 45100% same
Edited · 2
- catlog22/maestro-flow★ 57191% same
- catlog22/Maestro-Flow★ 57191% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-brainstormSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-roadmap-devSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-testingSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 57
Convergence Detection: Stop early if score stalls (no improvement in 2 consecutive iterations)
- Very specific: line 134
Read and execute: Ref: phases/01-setup.md
- Very specific: line 137
Create workspace at .workflow/.scratchpad/skill-iter-tune-{ts}/
- Distinctive: line 208
Check termination: score >= threshold | iter >= max | convergence | error limit
- Distinctive: line 245
Progressive Loading: Read phase doc ONLY when that phase is about to execute
- Distinctive: line 246
Snapshot Before Execute: Always snapshot skill state before each iteration
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Iter Tune
Iterative skill refinement through execute-evaluate-improve feedback loops. Each iteration runs the skill via Claude, evaluates output via Gemini, and applies improvements via Agent.
Architecture Overview
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Skill Iter Tune Orchestrator (SKILL.md) │
│ → Parse input → Setup workspace → Iteration Loop → Final Report │
└────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
┌──────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Phase 1 │ │ Iteration Loop (2→3→4) │ │ Phase 5 │
│ Setup │ │ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │ │ Report │
│ │─────→│ │ P2 │→ │ P3 │→ │ P4 │ │────→│ │
│ Backup + │ │ │Exec │ │Eval │ │Impr │ │ │ History │
│ Init │ │ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │ │ Summary │
└──────────┘ │ ↑ │ │ └──────────┘
│ └───────────────┘ │
│ (if score < threshold │
│ AND iter < max) │
└─────────────────────────────┘Chain Mode Extension
Chain Mode (execution_mode === "chain"):
Phase 2 runs per-skill in chain_order:
Skill A → ccw cli → artifacts/skill-A/
↓ (artifacts as input)
Skill B → ccw cli → artifacts/skill-B/
↓ (artifacts as input)
Skill C → ccw cli → artifacts/skill-C/
Phase 3 evaluates entire chain output + per-skill scores
Phase 4 improves weakest skill(s) in chainKey Design Principles
- Iteration Loop: Phases 2-3-4 repeat until quality threshold, max iterations, or convergence
- Two-Tool Pipeline: Claude (write/execute) + Gemini (analyze/evaluate) = complementary perspectives
- Pure Orchestrator: SKILL.md coordinates only — execution detail lives in phase files
- Progressive Phase Loading: Phase docs read only when that phase executes
- Skill Versioning: Each iteration snapshots skill state before execution
- Convergence Detection: Stop early if score stalls (no improvement in 2 consecutive iterations)
Interactive Preference Collection
// ★ Auto mode detection
const autoYes = /\b(-y|--yes)\b/.test($ARGUMENTS)
if (autoYes) {
workflowPreferences = {
autoYes: true,
maxIterations: 5,
qualityThreshold: 80,
executionMode: 'single'
}
} else {
const prefResponse = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "选择迭代调优配置:",
header: "Tune Config",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Quick (3 iter, 70)", description: "快速迭代,适合小幅改进" },
{ label: "Standard (5 iter, 80) (Recommended)", description: "平衡方案,适合多数场景" },
{ label: "Thorough (8 iter, 90)", description: "深度优化,适合生产级 skill" }
]
}
]
})
const configMap = {
"Quick": { maxIterations: 3, qualityThreshold: 70 },
"Standard": { maxIterations: 5, qualityThreshold: 80 },
"Thorough": { maxIterations: 8, qualityThreshold: 90 }
}
const selected = Object.keys(configMap).find(k =>
prefResponse["Tune Config"].startsWith(k)
) || "Standard"
workflowPreferences = { autoYes: false, ...configMap[selected] }
// ★ Mode selection: chain vs single
const modeResponse = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "选择调优模式:",
header: "Tune Mode",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Single Skill (Recommended)", description: "独立调优每个 skill,适合单一 skill 优化" },
{ label: "Skill Chain", description: "按链序执行,前一个 skill 的产出作为后一个的输入" }
]
}]
});
workflowPreferences.executionMode = modeResponse["Tune Mode"].startsWith("Skill Chain")
? "chain" : "single";
}Input Processing
$ARGUMENTS → Parse:
├─ Skill path(s): first arg, comma-separated for multiple
│ e.g., ".claude/skills/my-skill" or "my-skill" (auto-prefixed)
│ Chain mode: order preserved as chain_order
├─ Test scenario: --scenario "description" or remaining text
└─ Flags: --max-iterations=N, --threshold=N, -y/--yesExecution Flow
⚠️ COMPACT DIRECTIVE: Context compression MUST check TodoWrite phase status. The phase currently marked
in_progressis the active execution phase — preserve its FULL content. Only compress phases markedcompletedorpending.
Phase 1: Setup (one-time)
Read and execute: Ref: phases/01-setup.md
- Parse skill paths, validate existence
- Create workspace at
.workflow/.scratchpad/skill-iter-tune-{ts}/ - Backup original skill files
- Initialize iteration-state.json
Output: workDir, targetSkills[], testScenario, initialized state
Iteration Loop
// Orchestrator iteration loop
while (true) {
// Increment iteration
state.current_iteration++;
state.iterations.push({
round: state.current_iteration,
status: 'pending',
execution: null,
evaluation: null,
improvement: null
});
// Update TodoWrite
TaskUpdate(iterationTask, {
subject: `Iteration ${state.current_iteration}/${state.max_iterations}`,
status: 'in_progress',
activeForm: `Running iteration ${state.current_iteration}`
});
// === Phase 2: Execute ===
// Read: phases/02-execute.md
// Single mode: one ccw cli call for all skills
// Chain mode: sequential ccw cli per skill in chain_order, passing artifacts
// Snapshot skill → construct prompt → ccw cli --tool claude --mode write
// Collect artifacts
// === Phase 3: Evaluate ===
// Read: phases/03-evaluate.md
// Construct eval prompt → ccw cli --tool gemini --mode analysis
// Parse score → write iteration-N-eval.md → check termination
// Check termination
if (shouldTerminate(state)) {
break; // → Phase 5
}
// === Phase 4: Improve ===
// Read: phases/04-improve.md
// Agent applies suggestions → write iteration-N-changes.md
// Update TodoWrite with score
// Continue loop
}Phase 2: Execute Skill (per iteration)
Read and execute: Ref: phases/02-execute.md
- Snapshot skill →
iteration-{N}/skill-snapshot/ - Build execution prompt from skill content + test scenario
- Execute:
ccw cli -p "..." --tool claude --mode write --cd "${iterDir}/artifacts" - Collect artifacts
Phase 3: Evaluate Quality (per iteration)
Read and execute: Ref: phases/03-evaluate.md
- Build evaluation prompt with skill + artifacts + criteria + history
- Execute:
ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode analysis - Parse 5-dimension score (Clarity, Completeness, Correctness, Effectiveness, Efficiency)
- Write
iteration-{N}-eval.md - Check termination: score >= threshold | iter >= max | convergence | error limit
Phase 4: Apply Improvements (per iteration, skipped on termination)
Read and execute: Ref: phases/04-improve.md
- Read evaluation suggestions
- Launch general-purpose Agent to apply changes
- Write
iteration-{N}-changes.md - Update state
Phase 5: Final Report (one-time)
Read and execute: Ref: phases/05-report.md
- Generate comprehensive report with score progression table
- Write
final-report.md - Display summary to user
Phase Reference Documents (read on-demand when phase executes):
| Phase | Document | Purpose | Compact |
| 1 | phases/01-setup.md | Initialize workspace and state | TodoWrite 驱动 |
| 2 | phases/02-execute.md | Execute skill via ccw cli Claude | TodoWrite 驱动 + 🔄 sentinel |
| 3 | phases/03-evaluate.md | Evaluate via ccw cli Gemini | TodoWrite 驱动 + 🔄 sentinel |
| 4 | phases/04-improve.md | Apply improvements via Agent | TodoWrite 驱动 + 🔄 sentinel |
| 5 | phases/05-report.md | Generate final report | TodoWrite 驱动 |
Compact Rules:
- TodoWrite
in_progress→ 保留完整内容,禁止压缩 - TodoWrite
completed→ 可压缩为摘要 - 🔄 sentinel fallback → 若 compact 后仅存 sentinel 而无完整 Step 协议,立即
Read()恢复
Core Rules
- Start Immediately: First action is preference collection → Phase 1 setup
- Progressive Loading: Read phase doc ONLY when that phase is about to execute
- Snapshot Before Execute: Always snapshot skill state before each iteration
- Background CLI: ccw cli runs in background, wait for hook callback before proceeding
- Parse Every Output: Extract structured JSON from CLI outputs for state updates
- DO NOT STOP: Continuous iteration until termination condition met
- Single State Source:
iteration-state.jsonis the only source of truth
Data Flow
User Input (skill paths + test scenario)
↓ (+ execution_mode + chain_order if chain mode)
↓
Phase 1: Setup
↓ workDir, targetSkills[], testScenario, iteration-state.json
↓
┌─→ Phase 2: Execute (ccw cli claude)
│ ↓ artifacts/ (skill execution output)
│ ↓
│ Phase 3: Evaluate (ccw cli gemini)
│ ↓ score, dimensions[], suggestions[], iteration-N-eval.md
│ ↓
│ [Terminate?]─── YES ──→ Phase 5: Report → final-report.md
│ ↓ NO
│ ↓
│ Phase 4: Improve (Agent)
│ ↓ modified skill files, iteration-N-changes.md
│ ↓
└───┘ next iterationTodoWrite Pattern
// Initial state
TaskCreate({ subject: "Phase 1: Setup workspace", activeForm: "Setting up workspace" })
TaskCreate({ subject: "Iteration Loop", activeForm: "Running iterations" })
TaskCreate({ subject: "Phase 5: Final Report", activeForm: "Generating report" })
// Chain mode: create per-skill tracking tasks
if (state.execution_mode === 'chain') {
for (const skillName of state.chain_order) {
TaskCreate({
subject: `Chain: ${skillName}`,
activeForm: `Tracking ${skillName}`,
description: `Skill chain member position ${state.chain_order.indexOf(skillName) + 1}`
})
}
}
// During iteration N
// Single mode: one score per iteration (existing behavior)
// Chain mode: per-skill status updates
if (state.execution_mode === 'chain') {
// After each skill executes in Phase 2:
TaskUpdate(chainSkillTask, {
subject: `Chain: ${skillName} — Iter ${N} executed`,
activeForm: `${skillName} iteration ${N}`
})
// After Phase 3 evaluates:
TaskUpdate(chainSkillTask, {
subject: `Chain: ${skillName} — Score ${chainScores[skillName]}/100`,
activeForm: `${skillName} scored`
})
} else {
// Single mode (existing)
TaskCreate({
subject: `Iteration ${N}: Score ${score}/100`,
activeForm: `Iteration ${N} complete`,
description: `Strengths: ... | Weaknesses: ... | Suggestions: ${count}`
})
}
// Completed — collapse
TaskUpdate(iterLoop, {
subject: `Iteration Loop (${totalIters} iters, final: ${finalScore})`,
status: 'completed'
})Termination Logic
function shouldTerminate(state) {
// 1. Quality threshold met
if (state.latest_score >= state.quality_threshold) {
return { terminate: true, reason: 'quality_threshold_met' };
}
// 2. Max iterations reached
if (state.current_iteration >= state.max_iterations) {
return { terminate: true, reason: 'max_iterations_reached' };
}
// 3. Convergence: ≤2 points improvement over last 2 iterations
if (state.score_trend.length >= 3) {
const last3 = state.score_trend.slice(-3);
if (last3[2] - last3[0] <= 2) {
state.converged = true;
return { terminate: true, reason: 'convergence_detected' };
}
}
// 4. Error limit
if (state.error_count >= state.max_errors) {
return { terminate: true, reason: 'error_limit_reached' };
}
return { terminate: false };
}Error Handling
| Phase | Error | Recovery |
| 2: Execute | CLI timeout/crash | Retry once with simplified prompt, then skip |
| 3: Evaluate | CLI fails | Retry once, then use score 50 with warning |
| 3: Evaluate | JSON parse fails | Extract score heuristically, save raw output |
| 4: Improve | Agent fails | Rollback from iteration-{N}/skill-snapshot/ |
| Any | 3+ consecutive errors | Terminate with error report |
Error Budget: Each phase gets 1 retry. 3 consecutive failed iterations triggers termination.
Coordinator Checklist
Pre-Phase Actions
- Read iteration-state.json for current state
- Verify workspace directory exists
- Check error count hasn't exceeded limit
Per-Iteration Actions
- Increment current_iteration in state
- Create iteration-{N} subdirectory
- Update TodoWrite with iteration status
- After Phase 3: check termination before Phase 4
- After Phase 4: write state, proceed to next iteration
Post-Workflow Actions
- Execute Phase 5 (Report)
- Display final summary to user
- Update all TodoWrite tasks to completed
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

