team-roadmap-dev
Skill2.1k starsChanged 7 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Unified team skill for roadmap-driven development workflow. Coordinator discusses roadmap with user, then dispatches phased execution pipeline (plan -> execute -> verify). All roles invoke this skill with --role arg. Triggers on "team roadmap-dev".
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorerword for word, first seen May 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhao-wuyan/ccw-command-explorer★ 45100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormSkill
- ccw-chainSkill
- ccw-helpSkill
- delegation-checkSkill
- investigateSkill
- issue-manageSkill
- memory-captureSkill
- memory-manageSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
- skill-iter-tuneSkill
- skill-simplifySkill
- skill-tuningSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- team-arch-optSkill
- team-brainstormSkill
- team-coordinateSkill
- team-designerSkill
- team-executorSkill
- team-frontend-debugSkill
- team-frontendSkill
- team-interactive-craftSkill
- team-issueSkill
- team-lifecycle-v4Skill
- team-motion-designSkill
- team-perf-optSkill
- team-planexSkill
- team-quality-assuranceSkill
- team-reviewSkill
- team-tech-debtSkill
- team-testingSkill
- team-uidesignSkill
- team-ui-polishSkill
- team-ultra-analyzeSkill
- team-ux-improveSkill
- team-visual-a11ySkill
- wf-composerSkill
- wf-playerSkill
- workflow-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-executeSkill
- workflow-lite-planSkill
- workflow-lite-test-reviewSkill
- workflow-multi-cli-planSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-skill-designerSkill
- workflow-tdd-plan-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
- brainstormSkill
- investigateSkill
- review-cycleSkill
- spec-generatorSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-tdd-planSkill
- workflow-test-fixSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 130
When the pipeline completes:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Team Roadmap Dev
Roadmap-driven development with phased execution pipeline. Coordinator discusses roadmap with the user and manages phase transitions. Workers are spawned as team-worker agents.
Architecture
Skill(skill="team-roadmap-dev", args="<task-description>")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- roadmap-discuss -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+
v v v
[planner] [executor] [verifier]
(team-worker agents)
Pipeline (per phase):
PLAN-N01 -> EXEC-N01 -> VERIFY-N01 (gap closure loop if needed)
Multi-phase:
Phase 1 -> Phase 2 -> ... -> Phase N -> CompleteRole Registry
| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop |
| coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — |
| planner | roles/planner/role.md | PLAN-* | true |
| executor | roles/executor/role.md | EXEC-* | true |
| verifier | roles/verifier/role.md | VERIFY-* | true |
Role Router
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
- Has
--role <name>→ Readroles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4 - No
--role→@roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router
Shared Constants
- Session prefix:
RD - Session path:
.workflow/.team/RD-<slug>-<date>/ - Team name:
roadmap-dev - CLI tools:
ccw cli --mode analysis(read-only),ccw cli --mode write(modifications) - Message bus:
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)
Worker Spawn Template
Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker",
team_name: "roadmap-dev",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: roadmap-dev
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: true
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})All worker roles (planner, executor, verifier): Set inner_loop: true.
User Commands
| Command | Action |
check / status | Output execution status graph (phase-grouped), no advancement |
resume / continue | Check worker states, advance next step |
Session Directory
.workflow/.team/RD-<slug>-<date>/
+-- roadmap.md # Phase plan with requirements and success criteria
+-- state.md # Living memory (<100 lines)
+-- config.json # Session settings (mode, depth, gates)
+-- wisdom/ # Cross-task knowledge accumulation
| +-- learnings.md
| +-- decisions.md
| +-- conventions.md
| +-- issues.md
+-- phase-1/ # Per-phase artifacts
| +-- context.md
| +-- IMPL_PLAN.md
| +-- TODO_LIST.md
| +-- .task/IMPL-*.json
| +-- summary-*.md
| +-- verification.md
+-- phase-N/
| +-- ...
+-- .msg/
+-- messages.jsonl # Team message bus log
+-- meta.json # Session metadata + shared stateCompletion Action
When the pipeline completes:
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Roadmap Dev pipeline complete. What would you like to do?",
header: "Completion",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Archive & Clean (Recommended)", description: "Archive session, clean up tasks and team resources" },
{ label: "Keep Active", description: "Keep session active for follow-up work or inspection" },
{ label: "Export Results", description: "Export deliverables to a specified location, then clean" }
]
}]
})Specs Reference
- specs/pipelines.md — Pipeline definitions and task registry
Error Handling
| Scenario | Resolution |
| Unknown --role value | Error with role registry list |
| Role file not found | Error with expected path (roles/{name}/role.md) |
| project-tech.json missing | Coordinator invokes /workflow:spec:setup |
| Phase verification fails with gaps | Coordinator triggers gap closure loop (max 3 iterations) |
| Max gap closure iterations (3) | Report to user, ask for guidance |
| Worker crash | Respawn worker, reassign task |
| Session corruption | Attempt recovery, fallback to manual reconciliation |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

