agentleFS
anandartinanandartin/celestial-skills/skills/spring-boot-service-engineering/AGENTS.md

celestial-skills / spring-boot-service-engineering

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

A Java REST service on Spring Boot with layered packages by feature, validated DTOs, Flyway migrations and integration tests against real dependencies. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    Use constructor injection only.

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.

    line 40
  4. Distinctive:

    Use native elements first.

    line 53
  5. Very specific:

    When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …

    line 58
  6. Distinctive:

    Every release has a written rollback path

    line 96

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — Spring Boot service

A Java REST service on Spring Boot with layered packages by feature, validated DTOs, Flyway migrations and integration tests against real dependencies.

Setup and commands

  • dev: ./gradlew bootRun --args=--spring.profiles.active=local
  • e2e: ./gradlew integrationTest
  • lint: ./gradlew spotlessCheck checkstyleMain
  • test: ./gradlew test
  • build: ./gradlew bootJar
  • deploy: ./gradlew bootBuildImage
  • install: ./gradlew dependencies

Project structure

  • src/main/java/<base>/Application.java — Spring Boot entry point
  • src/main/java/<base>/<feature>/ — Package per feature: Controller, Service, Repository, entities and DTO records
  • src/main/java/<base>/common/ — Security config, exception handlers, shared value types
  • src/main/resources/application.yml — Defaults; secrets and environment values come from environment variables
  • src/main/resources/db/migration/ — Flyway migrations V<n>__description.sql
  • src/test/java/ — Unit, slice and Testcontainers integration tests mirroring main packages

Code style

  • Files: PascalCase.java, one public type per file
  • Tests: <Class>Test.java for unit; <Feature>IT.java for integration
  • Branches: type/short-description, e.g. feat/payout-schedule

Code

  • Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
  • Organise by feature package, not by layer; classes are package-private unless another feature needs them. (Boundaries are enforced by the compiler.)
  • Use constructor injection only; no field injection with @Autowired. (Dependencies are explicit and classes are testable without Spring.)

Components

  • Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)

Data

  • Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
  • Controllers accept and return DTO records annotated with Bean Validation and @Valid; JPA entities never cross the controller boundary. (Prevents over-posting and lazy-loading surprises during serialisation.)

Errors

  • Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
  • Return RFC 9457 problem details from one @RestControllerAdvice; log the exception once with a correlation id. (Consistent errors for clients and traceable logs for operators.)

Security

  • Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
  • Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
  • Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
  • Configure a SecurityFilterChain that denies by default and expose only /actuator/health publicly. (New endpoints are protected until someone opens them on purpose.)

Performance

  • Set open-in-view to false, define fetch plans per query, and keep @Transactional on service methods only. (Avoids hidden queries and long-held connections.)

Accessibility

  • Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)

Design and journeys

This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.

When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)

GateToolThresholdWhen
Lint and typesThe stack’s linter and type checker0 errorsEvery pull request
Unit and component testsThe stack’s test runnerAll pass; every design-skill component state coveredEvery pull request
Performance budgetGatling or k6 load test against the preview environmentp95 ≤ 250ms and p99 ≤ 600ms at target RPS; error rate < 0.1%Every pull request touching an endpoint or query
Dependency and secret scanDependency audit + secret scannerNo high or critical findings; no secretsEvery pull request and nightly
Preview deployHosting preview environmentA working preview link on the pull requestEvery pull request
Integration testsTestcontainers suiteAll pass against real PostgresEvery pull request

Pull requests

  • Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged within two days.

Review checklist

  • Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
  • Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
  • Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
  • Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
  • Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
  • Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
  • One approving review; two for security config, migrations or money movement
  • Reviewer checks the migration against the running schema

Definition of done

  • Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
  • Tests added for new behaviour and every state
  • Accessibility and performance gates green
  • Analytics events named from the experience skill
  • Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
  • DTOs validated and documented in the OpenAPI spec
  • Integration test covers success, validation failure and forbidden access

Release

  • Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
  • CI green before review
  • Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
  • Every release has a written rollback path
  • Merge to main builds an image; Flyway migrates on startup of the first new pod
  • Readiness probe gates traffic until migration and warm-up finish

Incidents

  • Roll back to the previous image; Flyway migrations stay forward-only, fixes ship as new migrations
  • Blameless note within 48 hours

Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “Spring Boot service” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.