agentleFS
anandartinanandartin/celestial-skills/skills/aspnet-core-api-engineering/AGENTS.md

celestial-skills / aspnet-core-api-engineering

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

A C# Web API on ASP.NET Core with minimal-API endpoint groups, EF Core migrations and integration tests that boot the real host. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    Use AsNoTracking for reads, project to response records with Select, and pass CancellationToken to every async EF call.

    line 38
  3. Distinctive:

    Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.

    line 41
  4. Distinctive:

    Call RequireAuthorization on the root group and use policies for roles.

    line 48
  5. Distinctive:

    Use native elements first.

    line 51
  6. Very specific:

    When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …

    line 56
  7. Distinctive:

    Every endpoint returns TypedResults for each status it can produce

    line 86
  8. Distinctive:

    Every release has a written rollback path

    line 93

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — ASP.NET Core Web API

A C# Web API on ASP.NET Core with minimal-API endpoint groups, EF Core migrations and integration tests that boot the real host.

Setup and commands

  • dev: dotnet watch --project src/Api
  • lint: dotnet format --verify-no-changes && dotnet build -warnaserror
  • test: dotnet test
  • build: dotnet publish src/Api -c Release
  • deploy: dotnet publish src/Api -c Release -t:PublishContainer
  • install: dotnet restore

Project structure

  • src/Api/Program.cs — Host setup: services, middleware order, endpoint group registration
  • src/Api/Features/<Feature>/ — Endpoints, request/response records, validators and handlers per feature
  • src/Api/Infrastructure/ — DbContext, EF configurations, external clients
  • src/Api/Migrations/ — EF Core migrations
  • tests/Api.Tests/ — Unit tests for handlers and validators
  • tests/Api.IntegrationTests/ — WebApplicationFactory tests against a containerised database
  • Directory.Build.props — Shared settings: nullable on, warnings as errors, analyzers

Code style

  • Files: PascalCase.cs, one type per file
  • Tests: <Type>Tests.cs; methods Method_Scenario_Expected
  • Branches: type/short-description, e.g. feat/supplier-sync

Code

  • Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
  • Group endpoints per feature with MapGroup and keep each handler a small static method or class taking its dependencies as parameters. (Features stay discoverable and handlers are unit-testable.)
  • Enable nullable reference types and treat warnings as errors in Directory.Build.props. (Null mistakes fail the build instead of production.)

Components

  • Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)

Data

  • Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
  • Bind requests to record types and validate them with an endpoint filter (FluentValidation or DataAnnotations) before the handler runs. (Invalid input never reaches business logic.)
  • Use AsNoTracking for reads, project to response records with Select, and pass CancellationToken to every async EF call. (Smaller queries and requests that stop work when the client goes away.)

Errors

  • Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
  • Register AddProblemDetails and UseExceptionHandler; return TypedResults so OpenAPI shows every status. (Clients get consistent errors and accurate docs.)

Security

  • Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
  • Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
  • Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
  • Call RequireAuthorization on the root group and use policies for roles; AllowAnonymous is explicit and reviewed. (New endpoints fail closed.)

Accessibility

  • Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)

Design and journeys

This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.

When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)

GateToolThresholdWhen
Lint and typesdotnet build -warnaserror + .NET analyzers + dotnet format0 warnings, 0 errorsEvery pull request
Unit and component testsThe stack’s test runnerAll pass; every design-skill component state coveredEvery pull request
Performance budgetk6 or NBomber load test against the preview environmentp95 ≤ 200ms and p99 ≤ 500ms at target RPS; error rate < 0.1%Every pull request touching an endpoint or query
Dependency and secret scanDependency audit + secret scannerNo high or critical findings; no secretsEvery pull request and nightly
Preview deployHosting preview environmentA working preview link on the pull requestEvery pull request

Pull requests

  • Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged within two days.

Review checklist

  • Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
  • Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
  • Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
  • Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
  • Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
  • Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
  • One approving review; two for auth policies, migrations or data deletion
  • Reviewer checks the generated OpenAPI diff

Definition of done

  • Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
  • Tests added for new behaviour and every state
  • Accessibility and performance gates green
  • Analytics events named from the experience skill
  • Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
  • Every endpoint returns TypedResults for each status it can produce
  • Integration test covers success, 400 validation and 403 forbidden

Release

  • Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
  • CI green before review
  • Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
  • Every release has a written rollback path
  • Merge to main publishes an image; EF migration bundle runs as a release step before rollout
  • Migrations stay compatible with the previous release

Incidents

  • Roll back by redeploying the previous image tag
  • Blameless note within 48 hours

Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “ASP.NET Core Web API” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.