celestial-skills / graphql-api-engineering
AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
A code-first GraphQL API in TypeScript with batched data loading, field-level authorisation, cost limits and a schema that only changes in backwards-compatible steps. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path
- Installs packages
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository182 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/accessibility-audit-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/angular-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/aspnet-core-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/chrome-extension-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/ci-cd-pipelines-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/code-review-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/compose-android-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/context-engineering-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/database-migrations-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/dbt-analytics-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/dependency-supply-chain-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/deprecation-and-removal-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/design-tokens-to-code-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/django-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/end-to-end-testing-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/expo-react-native-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fastapi-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fastify-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/feature-flags-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/flutter-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/framework-upgrades-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/git-workflow-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/go-http-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/incident-response-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/incremental-implementation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/internationalisation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/kubernetes-helm-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/laravel-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/launch-readiness-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/llm-features-and-evals-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/marketing-site-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nestjs-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nextjs-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nuxt-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/observability-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/privacy-by-design-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/python-ml-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rails-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-web-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/release-and-versioning-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/requirements-interview-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rest-api-design-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rust-axum-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rust-cli-tool-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/safe-refactoring-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/secure-code-review-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/source-grounded-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spec-before-code-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spec-driven-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spring-boot-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/sveltekit-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/swiftui-ios-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/systematic-debugging-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/task-breakdown-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/tauri-desktop-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/technical-documentation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/terraform-infrastructure-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/test-first-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/threat-modelling-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/typescript-library-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 41
Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.
- Distinctive: line 52
Every field that loads a related record or list goes through a per-request DataLoader.
- Distinctive: line 55
Use native elements first.
- Very specific: line 60
When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …
- Distinctive: line 98
Every release has a written rollback path
- Distinctive: line 104
Write a blameless note within 48 hours: what happened, impact, fix, prevention
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md — GraphQL API server
A code-first GraphQL API in TypeScript with batched data loading, field-level authorisation, cost limits and a schema that only changes in backwards-compatible steps.
Setup and commands
- dev:
pnpm dev - lint:
pnpm lint && pnpm typecheck && pnpm schema:check - test:
pnpm test - build:
pnpm build - deploy:
docker build -t graphql-api . && pnpm deploy:staging - install:
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
Project structure
src/server.ts— Yoga server, plugins (depth and cost limits, error masking, persisted operations) and health checkssrc/schema/builder.ts— Pothos builder with context type, scalars and auth pluginsrc/schema/<domain>/— Object types, queries and mutations for one domainsrc/loaders/— DataLoader factories, created fresh per request in the contextsrc/services/— Business logic and database access; resolvers stay thinschema.graphql— Printed schema, committed and diffed in reviewtests/operations/— One test file per client operation or journey, against a real database
Code style
- Files: kebab-case.ts
- Tests: *.test.ts beside services; tests/operations/
<journey-id>.test.ts - Branches: type/short-description, e.g. feat/invoice-line-items
- Components: Types PascalCase; fields camelCase; mutations verbNoun (createInvoice) with Input and Payload types
Code
- Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
- Resolvers only map arguments, call a service and return; business rules live in src/services. (Logic is testable without GraphQL and reusable from jobs and webhooks.)
Components
- Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)
Data
- Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
- Schema changes are additive; mark fields @deprecated with a reason and remove them only when usage metrics show zero for 30 days. (Mobile clients stay installed for months and cannot all upgrade at once.)
- Lists use cursor-based connections with a default and maximum first argument. (Stable pagination and a hard cap on rows per request.)
Errors
- Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
- Expected failures are typed results in the payload (union of success and error types); unexpected errors are masked to a generic message with a request id. (Clients can handle business errors, and stack traces never leak.)
Security
- Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
- Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
- Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
- Authorise in the schema at field level (auth scopes on types and fields), not only at the top-level query. (Nested fields can reach data through paths the top-level check never saw.)
- Enforce max depth, max cost per operation and max page size; first-party clients use persisted operations in production. (One crafted query must not exhaust the database.)
Performance
- Every field that loads a related record or list goes through a per-request DataLoader; resolvers never query inside a loop. (Prevents N+1 queries that turn one request into hundreds.)
Accessibility
- Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)
Design and journeys
This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.
When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.
Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)
| Gate | Tool | Threshold | When |
| Lint and types | The stack’s linter and type checker | 0 errors | Every pull request |
| Unit and component tests | The stack’s test runner | All pass; every design-skill component state covered | Every pull request |
| Performance budget | Load test of persisted operations + query counter in operation tests | p95 ≤ 300ms per operation at expected peak · ≤ 1 SQL query per relation per request | Every pull request (load test nightly) |
| Dependency and secret scan | Dependency audit + secret scanner | No high or critical findings; no secrets | Every pull request and nightly |
| Preview deploy | Hosting preview environment | A working preview link on the pull request | Every pull request |
| Schema compatibility | GraphQL Inspector diff against main | 0 breaking changes; removals only for fields deprecated 30+ days with zero recorded usage | Every pull request |
Pull requests
- Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged within two days.
Review checklist
- Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
- Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
- Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
- Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
- Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
- Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
- One approving review; two for auth scopes, cost limits or data deletion
- A client developer reviews any new or changed type
Definition of done
- Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
- Tests added for new behaviour and every state
- Accessibility and performance gates green
- Analytics events named from the experience skill
- Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
- Printed schema updated and every new field has a description
- Operation test covers success, a typed error and an unauthorised caller
Release
- Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
- CI green before review
- Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
- Every release has a written rollback path
- Merge to main deploys to production with a canary at 10% for 30 minutes
- Database migrations run before the deploy and stay compatible with the previous release
Incidents
- Roll back to the previous image; block a runaway operation by name at the gateway
- Write a blameless note within 48 hours: what happened, impact, fix, prevention
Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “GraphQL API server” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

