agentleFS
anandartinanandartin/celestial-skills/skills/rust-cli-tool-engineering/AGENTS.md

celestial-skills / rust-cli-tool-engineering

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

A single-binary command-line tool in Rust with typed argument parsing, clear exit codes and tests that run the real binary. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

  • Commits and pushes

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.

    line 29
  2. Very specific:

    Every command that prints results supports --json with a stable, versioned shape.

    line 37
  3. Distinctive:

    Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.

    line 40
  4. Distinctive:

    No unwrap() or expect() outside tests.

    line 41
  5. Distinctive:

    Never pass user input through a shell.

    line 48
  6. Distinctive:

    Use native elements first.

    line 54
  7. Very specific:

    When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …

    line 60
  8. Distinctive:

    Every release has a written rollback path

    line 100
  9. Distinctive:

    Add a regression test reproducing the report before shipping the fix

    line 106

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — Rust CLI tool

A single-binary command-line tool in Rust with typed argument parsing, clear exit codes and tests that run the real binary.

Setup and commands

  • dev: cargo run -- --help
  • lint: cargo fmt --check && cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
  • test: cargo test --all-features
  • build: cargo build --release
  • deploy: git tag vX.Y.Z && git push --tags
  • install: cargo fetch

Project structure

  • src/main.rs — Parses arguments, calls run(), maps errors to exit codes; nothing else
  • src/cli.rs — clap derive structs: the full command surface in one file
  • src/commands/ — One module per subcommand, each exposing run(args, ctx) -> Result
  • src/lib.rs — Core logic with no terminal I/O, so it can be unit-tested and reused
  • src/output.rs — Human and --json renderers; the only place that writes to stdout
  • tests/ — Integration tests that run the built binary against fixture files
  • tests/snapshots/ — Reviewed insta snapshots of help text and output

Code style

  • Files: snake_case.rs; one module per subcommand named after it
  • Tests: #[cfg(test)] mod tests beside the code; tests/<subcommand>.rs for binary tests
  • Branches: type/short-description, e.g. fix/glob-on-windows
  • Components: Types PascalCase, functions and modules snake_case, flags kebab-case (--dry-run)

Code

  • Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
  • Data goes to stdout, diagnostics and progress go to stderr. (Piping the output into another tool must not capture log lines.)

Components

  • Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)

Data

  • Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
  • Every command that prints results supports --json with a stable, versioned shape. (Other programs can consume the tool without parsing prose.)

Errors

  • Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
  • No unwrap() or expect() outside tests; return Result and add context at each layer. (A panic prints a stack trace instead of a message the user can act on.)
  • Exit 0 on success, 1 on runtime failure, 2 on bad usage; document any other codes. (Scripts and CI branch on exit codes, not on text.)

Security

  • Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
  • Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
  • Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
  • Never pass user input through a shell; build std::process::Command with explicit args. (Prevents command injection from file names and arguments.)

Performance

  • Stream large inputs with buffered readers instead of reading whole files into memory. (The tool keeps working on files larger than RAM.)

Accessibility

  • Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)
  • Disable colour and spinners when NO_COLOR is set or stdout is not a terminal. (Logs, screen readers and CI output stay readable.)

Design and journeys

This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.

When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)

GateToolThresholdWhen
Lint and typesrustfmt + clippy with -D warnings0 warnings, formatting cleanEvery pull request
Unit and component testsThe stack’s test runnerAll pass; every design-skill component state coveredEvery pull request
Journey testsEnd-to-end runnerOne test per experience-skill journey: happy path + error stateEvery pull request
AccessibilityAutomated audit (axe on web, platform audit on mobile)WCAG 2.2 AA · no new violationsEvery pull request
Performance budgetLab measurement in CIWeb: LCP ≤ 2.5s · INP ≤ 200ms · CLS ≤ 0.1 · ≤ 170KB JS per route. Mobile: cold start ≤ 2s · 60fps scrollEvery pull request
Dependency and secret scancargo audit + cargo deny + secret scannerNo unpatched advisories; only allowed licences; no secretsEvery pull request and nightly
Preview deployHosting preview environmentA working preview link on the pull requestEvery pull request
Cross-platform buildCI matrix: Linux, macOS, WindowsRelease build and full test suite pass on every targetEvery pull request

Pull requests

  • Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged.

Review checklist

  • Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
  • Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
  • Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
  • Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
  • Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
  • Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
  • Reviewer runs the changed command locally against a fixture, including a failure case
  • Any change to flags, exit codes or --json output is called out in the description

Definition of done

  • Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
  • Tests added for new behaviour and every state
  • Accessibility and performance gates green
  • Analytics events named from the experience skill
  • Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
  • Help text and README usage updated for new or changed flags
  • Integration test covers success, bad input and exit code

Release

  • Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
  • CI green before review
  • Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
  • Every release has a written rollback path
  • Tag vX.Y.Z on main; CI builds binaries per target, writes checksums and attaches them to the release
  • Version in Cargo.toml follows semantic versioning; the CLI surface is the public API

Incidents

  • Yank or mark the broken release and point the install docs at the previous tag
  • Add a regression test reproducing the report before shipping the fix

Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “Rust CLI tool” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.