celestial-skills / rust-cli-tool-engineering
AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
A single-binary command-line tool in Rust with typed argument parsing, clear exit codes and tests that run the real binary. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.
- Commits and pushes
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository182 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/accessibility-audit-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/angular-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/aspnet-core-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/chrome-extension-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/ci-cd-pipelines-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/code-review-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/compose-android-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/context-engineering-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/database-migrations-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/dbt-analytics-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/dependency-supply-chain-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/deprecation-and-removal-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/design-tokens-to-code-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/django-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/end-to-end-testing-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/expo-react-native-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fastapi-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fastify-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/feature-flags-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/flutter-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/framework-upgrades-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/git-workflow-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/go-http-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/graphql-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/incident-response-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/incremental-implementation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/internationalisation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/kubernetes-helm-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/laravel-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/launch-readiness-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/llm-features-and-evals-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/marketing-site-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nestjs-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nextjs-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nuxt-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/observability-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/privacy-by-design-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/python-ml-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rails-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-web-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/release-and-versioning-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/requirements-interview-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rest-api-design-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rust-axum-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/safe-refactoring-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/secure-code-review-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/source-grounded-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spec-before-code-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spec-driven-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spring-boot-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/sveltekit-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/swiftui-ios-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/systematic-debugging-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/task-breakdown-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/tauri-desktop-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/technical-documentation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/terraform-infrastructure-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/test-first-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/threat-modelling-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/typescript-library-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.
- Very specific: line 37
Every command that prints results supports --json with a stable, versioned shape.
- Distinctive: line 40
Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.
- Distinctive: line 41
No unwrap() or expect() outside tests.
- Distinctive: line 48
Never pass user input through a shell.
- Distinctive: line 54
Use native elements first.
- Very specific: line 60
When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …
- Distinctive: line 100
Every release has a written rollback path
- Distinctive: line 106
Add a regression test reproducing the report before shipping the fix
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md — Rust CLI tool
A single-binary command-line tool in Rust with typed argument parsing, clear exit codes and tests that run the real binary.
Setup and commands
- dev:
cargo run -- --help - lint:
cargo fmt --check && cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings - test:
cargo test --all-features - build:
cargo build --release - deploy:
git tag vX.Y.Z && git push --tags - install:
cargo fetch
Project structure
src/main.rs— Parses arguments, calls run(), maps errors to exit codes; nothing elsesrc/cli.rs— clap derive structs: the full command surface in one filesrc/commands/— One module per subcommand, each exposing run(args, ctx) -> Resultsrc/lib.rs— Core logic with no terminal I/O, so it can be unit-tested and reusedsrc/output.rs— Human and --json renderers; the only place that writes to stdouttests/— Integration tests that run the built binary against fixture filestests/snapshots/— Reviewed insta snapshots of help text and output
Code style
- Files: snake_case.rs; one module per subcommand named after it
- Tests: #[cfg(test)] mod tests beside the code; tests/
<subcommand>.rs for binary tests - Branches: type/short-description, e.g. fix/glob-on-windows
- Components: Types PascalCase, functions and modules snake_case, flags kebab-case (--dry-run)
Code
- Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
- Data goes to stdout, diagnostics and progress go to stderr. (Piping the output into another tool must not capture log lines.)
Components
- Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)
Data
- Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
- Every command that prints results supports --json with a stable, versioned shape. (Other programs can consume the tool without parsing prose.)
Errors
- Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
- No unwrap() or expect() outside tests; return Result and add context at each layer. (A panic prints a stack trace instead of a message the user can act on.)
- Exit 0 on success, 1 on runtime failure, 2 on bad usage; document any other codes. (Scripts and CI branch on exit codes, not on text.)
Security
- Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
- Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
- Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
- Never pass user input through a shell; build std::process::Command with explicit args. (Prevents command injection from file names and arguments.)
Performance
- Stream large inputs with buffered readers instead of reading whole files into memory. (The tool keeps working on files larger than RAM.)
Accessibility
- Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)
- Disable colour and spinners when NO_COLOR is set or stdout is not a terminal. (Logs, screen readers and CI output stay readable.)
Design and journeys
This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.
When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.
Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)
| Gate | Tool | Threshold | When |
| Lint and types | rustfmt + clippy with -D warnings | 0 warnings, formatting clean | Every pull request |
| Unit and component tests | The stack’s test runner | All pass; every design-skill component state covered | Every pull request |
| Journey tests | End-to-end runner | One test per experience-skill journey: happy path + error state | Every pull request |
| Accessibility | Automated audit (axe on web, platform audit on mobile) | WCAG 2.2 AA · no new violations | Every pull request |
| Performance budget | Lab measurement in CI | Web: LCP ≤ 2.5s · INP ≤ 200ms · CLS ≤ 0.1 · ≤ 170KB JS per route. Mobile: cold start ≤ 2s · 60fps scroll | Every pull request |
| Dependency and secret scan | cargo audit + cargo deny + secret scanner | No unpatched advisories; only allowed licences; no secrets | Every pull request and nightly |
| Preview deploy | Hosting preview environment | A working preview link on the pull request | Every pull request |
| Cross-platform build | CI matrix: Linux, macOS, Windows | Release build and full test suite pass on every target | Every pull request |
Pull requests
- Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged.
Review checklist
- Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
- Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
- Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
- Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
- Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
- Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
- Reviewer runs the changed command locally against a fixture, including a failure case
- Any change to flags, exit codes or --json output is called out in the description
Definition of done
- Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
- Tests added for new behaviour and every state
- Accessibility and performance gates green
- Analytics events named from the experience skill
- Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
- Help text and README usage updated for new or changed flags
- Integration test covers success, bad input and exit code
Release
- Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
- CI green before review
- Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
- Every release has a written rollback path
- Tag vX.Y.Z on main; CI builds binaries per target, writes checksums and attaches them to the release
- Version in Cargo.toml follows semantic versioning; the CLI surface is the public API
Incidents
- Yank or mark the broken release and point the install docs at the previous tag
- Add a regression test reproducing the report before shipping the fix
Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “Rust CLI tool” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

