agentleFS
anandartinanandartin/celestial-skills/skills/dbt-analytics-engineering/AGENTS.md

celestial-skills / dbt-analytics-engineering

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

A version-controlled analytics project in SQL and dbt, with layered models, tested data contracts and documented metrics. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

  • Installs packages

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Every model has a primary key with unique and not_null tests.

    line 39
  3. Distinctive:

    Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    Use native elements first.

    line 55
  5. Very specific:

    When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …

    line 60
  6. Distinctive:

    Every release has a written rollback path

    line 101

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — dbt analytics project

A version-controlled analytics project in SQL and dbt, with layered models, tested data contracts and documented metrics.

Setup and commands

  • dev: dbt build --select state:modified+ --defer --state prod-manifest/
  • lint: sqlfluff lint models/ && dbt parse
  • test: dbt test
  • build: dbt build --target prod
  • deploy: dbt docs generate
  • install: uv pip install -r requirements.txt && dbt deps

Project structure

  • models/staging/ — One view per source table: rename, cast, deduplicate; no joins
  • models/intermediate/ — Reusable joins and business logic, not exposed to dashboards
  • models/marts/ — Facts and dimensions grouped by domain, the only layer BI tools read
  • models/**/_*.yml — Sources, column docs, tests and contracts beside the models they describe
  • macros/ — Shared Jinja macros with a docstring and a test model
  • seeds/ — Small static mapping tables kept in version control
  • snapshots/ — Slowly changing history of mutable source rows
  • tests/ — Singular SQL tests for rules that generic tests cannot express

Code style

  • Files: stg_<source>__<table>.sql, int_<entity><verb>.sql, fct<event>.sql, dim_<entity>.sql
  • Tests: Generic tests in _<folder>_models.yml; singular tests assert<rule>.sql
  • Branches: type/short-description, e.g. feat/orders-refund-columns
  • Components: Columns snake_case; primary key <entity>id; booleans is/has_; timestamps <event>_at

Code

  • Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
  • Staging models are the only place that renames and casts source columns. (Downstream models see one clean vocabulary.)

Components

  • Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)

Data

  • Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
  • Reference other models only with ref() and raw tables only with source(); never hard-code schema names. (Keeps the dependency graph correct and lets the same code run in dev, CI and prod.)
  • Every model has a primary key with unique and not_null tests. (Silent duplicates are the most common cause of inflated numbers.)
  • Mart models declare an enforced contract with column names and types. (A breaking change fails the build instead of a dashboard.)

Errors

  • Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)

Security

  • Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
  • Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
  • Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
  • Warehouse credentials come from environment variables in profiles.yml; personal data columns are tagged and masked in marts. (Keeps secrets out of git and limits who sees sensitive fields.)

Performance

  • Make a model incremental only after it is slow or costly as a table, and give it a unique_key and a lookback window. (Incremental logic adds risk; spend it where it saves time or money.)

Accessibility

  • Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)

Design and journeys

This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.

When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)

GateToolThresholdWhen
Lint and typesSQLFluff + dbt parse0 lint errors; project compilesEvery pull request
Unit and component testsThe stack’s test runnerAll pass; every design-skill component state coveredEvery pull request
Journey testsEnd-to-end runnerOne test per experience-skill journey: happy path + error stateEvery pull request
AccessibilityAutomated audit (axe on web, platform audit on mobile)WCAG 2.2 AA · no new violationsEvery pull request
Performance budgetLab measurement in CIWeb: LCP ≤ 2.5s · INP ≤ 200ms · CLS ≤ 0.1 · ≤ 170KB JS per route. Mobile: cold start ≤ 2s · 60fps scrollEvery pull request
Dependency and secret scanDependency audit + secret scannerNo high or critical findings; no secretsEvery pull request and nightly
Preview deployHosting preview environmentA working preview link on the pull requestEvery pull request
Slim CI builddbt build --select state:modified+ into a pull-request schemaAll modified models and their children build; all tests pass; contracts holdEvery pull request
Source freshnessdbt source freshnessNo source past its error_after windowBefore each production run

Pull requests

  • Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main; production runs from main only.

Review checklist

  • Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
  • Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
  • Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
  • Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
  • Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
  • Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
  • Reviewer compares row counts and key metrics between the pull-request schema and production
  • Any change to a mart column is checked against the exposures that use it

Definition of done

  • Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
  • Tests added for new behaviour and every state
  • Accessibility and performance gates green
  • Analytics events named from the experience skill
  • Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
  • Primary key tested and every new column described
  • Exposures updated when a dashboard depends on the change

Release

  • Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
  • CI green before review
  • Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
  • Every release has a written rollback path
  • Merge to main; the next scheduled run deploys
  • Breaking mart changes ship as a new versioned model, with the old version deprecated for one release

Incidents

  • Revert the merge and rerun the affected models with --full-refresh only if incremental state is corrupt
  • Tell dashboard owners which tables and dates were wrong, then add the test that would have caught it

Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “dbt analytics project” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.