celestial-skills / rust-axum-service-engineering
AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 19 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
A Rust web service on Axum and Tokio with typed extractors, compile-time checked SQL and errors that map to HTTP responses through one type. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository182 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/accessibility-audit-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/angular-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/aspnet-core-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/chrome-extension-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/ci-cd-pipelines-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/code-review-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/compose-android-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/context-engineering-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/database-migrations-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/dbt-analytics-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/dependency-supply-chain-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/deprecation-and-removal-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/design-tokens-to-code-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/django-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/end-to-end-testing-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/expo-react-native-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fastapi-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fastify-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/feature-flags-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/flutter-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/framework-upgrades-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/git-workflow-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/go-http-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/graphql-api-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/incident-response-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/incremental-implementation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/internationalisation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/kubernetes-helm-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/laravel-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/launch-readiness-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/llm-features-and-evals-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/marketing-site-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nestjs-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nextjs-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/nuxt-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/observability-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/privacy-by-design-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/python-ml-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rails-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-web-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/release-and-versioning-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/requirements-interview-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rest-api-design-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rust-cli-tool-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/safe-refactoring-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/secure-code-review-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/source-grounded-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spec-before-code-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spec-driven-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/spring-boot-service-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/sveltekit-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/swiftui-ios-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/systematic-debugging-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/task-breakdown-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/tauri-desktop-app-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/technical-documentation-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/terraform-infrastructure-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/test-first-development-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/threat-modelling-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/typescript-library-engineering/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 29
No unwrap() or expect() outside startup and tests.
- Distinctive: line 30
Keep handlers small: extract, call a domain function, map to a response type.
- Very specific: line 37
Use sqlx::query! or query_as!
- Distinctive: line 40
Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.
- Distinctive: line 47
Add tower-http layers for request body limit, timeout, CORS allow-list and tracing.
- Distinctive: line 50
Never block the async runtime: move CPU-heavy or blocking work into tokio::task::spawn_blocking.
- Distinctive: line 53
Use native elements first.
- Very specific: line 58
When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …
- Distinctive: line 95
Every release has a written rollback path
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md — Rust Axum service
A Rust web service on Axum and Tokio with typed extractors, compile-time checked SQL and errors that map to HTTP responses through one type.
Setup and commands
- dev:
cargo watch -x run - lint:
cargo fmt --check && cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings - test:
cargo test - build:
cargo build --release - deploy:
docker build -t service . && docker push service - install:
cargo fetch
Project structure
src/main.rs— Reads config, builds AppState, starts the server with graceful shutdownsrc/app.rs— Builds the Router and Tower middleware layers; tests import thissrc/routes/— One module per resource with handlers and request/response typessrc/error.rs— AppError enum implementing IntoResponsesrc/db/— Queries and domain types backed by SQLxmigrations/— SQLx migrationstests/— Integration tests calling the router with oneshot
Code style
- Files: snake_case.rs
- Tests: #[cfg(test)] mod tests in the same file; tests/
<resource>.rs for integration - Branches: type/short-description, e.g. feat/streaming-export
Code
- Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
- No unwrap() or expect() outside startup and tests; use ? with context from anyhow or thiserror. (A panic in a handler drops the request and hides the cause.)
- Keep handlers small: extract, call a domain function, map to a response type. (Domain logic stays testable without HTTP.)
Components
- Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)
Data
- Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
- Use sqlx::query! or query_as! macros and commit the offline query data (.sqlx/) so CI builds without a database. (Schema drift becomes a compile error.)
Errors
- Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
- Handlers return Result<T, AppError>; AppError implements IntoResponse and is the only place status codes for failures are chosen. (Consistent error bodies and no unwrap() on request paths.)
Security
- Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
- Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
- Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
- Add tower-http layers for request body limit, timeout, CORS allow-list and tracing; deserialise with deny_unknown_fields. (Bounded, strict input at the edge of the service.)
Performance
- Never block the async runtime: move CPU-heavy or blocking work into tokio::task::spawn_blocking. (One blocking call stalls every task on that worker thread.)
Accessibility
- Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)
Design and journeys
This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.
When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.
Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)
| Gate | Tool | Threshold | When |
| Lint and types | rustfmt + clippy with -D warnings | 0 warnings | Every pull request |
| Unit and component tests | The stack’s test runner | All pass; every design-skill component state covered | Every pull request |
| Performance budget | Load test against the preview environment + criterion benchmarks on hot paths | p95 ≤ 50ms and p99 ≤ 200ms at target RPS; no benchmark regression > 10% | Every pull request touching a handler or query |
| Dependency and secret scan | cargo deny (advisories, licences, bans) + secret scanner | No advisories; no disallowed licences; no secrets | Every pull request and nightly |
| Preview deploy | Hosting preview environment | A working preview link on the pull request | Every pull request |
Pull requests
- Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged within two days.
Review checklist
- Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
- Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
- Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
- Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
- Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
- Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
- One approving review; two for auth, migrations or any unsafe block
- Reviewer checks new .await points for held locks and blocking calls
Definition of done
- Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
- Tests added for new behaviour and every state
- Accessibility and performance gates green
- Analytics events named from the experience skill
- Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
- Integration test covers success, bad input and unauthorised cases
- clippy clean with no new allow attributes
Release
- Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
- CI green before review
- Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
- Every release has a written rollback path
- Merge to main builds a release image; rolling update gated on a readiness endpoint
- sqlx migrate run executes as a release step and stays backwards compatible
Incidents
- Roll back by redeploying the previous image tag
- Blameless note within 48 hours
Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “Rust Axum service” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

