agentleFS
anandartinanandartin/celestial-skills/skills/rust-axum-service-engineering/AGENTS.md

celestial-skills / rust-axum-service-engineering

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 19 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

A Rust web service on Axum and Tokio with typed extractors, compile-time checked SQL and errors that map to HTTP responses through one type. When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    No unwrap() or expect() outside startup and tests.

    line 29
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep handlers small: extract, call a domain function, map to a response type.

    line 30
  4. Very specific:

    Use sqlx::query! or query_as!

    line 37
  5. Distinctive:

    Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill.

    line 40
  6. Distinctive:

    Add tower-http layers for request body limit, timeout, CORS allow-list and tracing.

    line 47
  7. Distinctive:

    Never block the async runtime: move CPU-heavy or blocking work into tokio::task::spawn_blocking.

    line 50
  8. Distinctive:

    Use native elements first.

    line 53
  9. Very specific:

    When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name …

    line 58
  10. Distinctive:

    Every release has a written rollback path

    line 95

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — Rust Axum service

A Rust web service on Axum and Tokio with typed extractors, compile-time checked SQL and errors that map to HTTP responses through one type.

Setup and commands

  • dev: cargo watch -x run
  • lint: cargo fmt --check && cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings
  • test: cargo test
  • build: cargo build --release
  • deploy: docker build -t service . && docker push service
  • install: cargo fetch

Project structure

  • src/main.rs — Reads config, builds AppState, starts the server with graceful shutdown
  • src/app.rs — Builds the Router and Tower middleware layers; tests import this
  • src/routes/ — One module per resource with handlers and request/response types
  • src/error.rs — AppError enum implementing IntoResponse
  • src/db/ — Queries and domain types backed by SQLx
  • migrations/ — SQLx migrations
  • tests/ — Integration tests calling the router with oneshot

Code style

  • Files: snake_case.rs
  • Tests: #[cfg(test)] mod tests in the same file; tests/<resource>.rs for integration
  • Branches: type/short-description, e.g. feat/streaming-export

Code

  • Prefer small, pure functions and explicit types at module boundaries. (Easier to test, review and change.)
  • No unwrap() or expect() outside startup and tests; use ? with context from anyhow or thiserror. (A panic in a handler drops the request and hides the cause.)
  • Keep handlers small: extract, call a domain function, map to a response type. (Domain logic stays testable without HTTP.)

Components

  • Components read design tokens; no raw hex values, pixel sizes or font names in component code. (One token change restyles the product.)

Data

  • Analytics events are object_action in snake_case and come from the experience skill’s measures. (Names stay consistent across teams and tools.)
  • Use sqlx::query! or query_as! macros and commit the offline query data (.sqlx/) so CI builds without a database. (Schema drift becomes a compile error.)

Errors

  • Every async action has loading, empty, error and success states, matching the experience skill. (Unhandled states are where users get stuck.)
  • Handlers return Result<T, AppError>; AppError implements IntoResponse and is the only place status codes for failures are chosen. (Consistent error bodies and no unwrap() on request paths.)

Security

  • Secrets never live in the repository; read them from the environment or a secret store. (A leaked key outlives the commit that removed it.)
  • Validate every input on the server, even when the client already did. (Clients can be bypassed.)
  • Web pages ship a Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options and nosniff. (Cheap protection against the most common attacks.)
  • Add tower-http layers for request body limit, timeout, CORS allow-list and tracing; deserialise with deny_unknown_fields. (Bounded, strict input at the edge of the service.)

Performance

  • Never block the async runtime: move CPU-heavy or blocking work into tokio::task::spawn_blocking. (One blocking call stalls every task on that worker thread.)

Accessibility

  • Use native elements first; add ARIA only when no native element fits. (Native controls bring keyboard and screen-reader support for free.)

Design and journeys

This stack has no UI; design skills do not apply.

When a Celestial experience skill is in use, give each journey one end-to-end test (happy path plus its error and empty states) and name analytics events object_action from its measures.

Testing and checks (must pass before a pull request)

GateToolThresholdWhen
Lint and typesrustfmt + clippy with -D warnings0 warningsEvery pull request
Unit and component testsThe stack’s test runnerAll pass; every design-skill component state coveredEvery pull request
Performance budgetLoad test against the preview environment + criterion benchmarks on hot pathsp95 ≤ 50ms and p99 ≤ 200ms at target RPS; no benchmark regression > 10%Every pull request touching a handler or query
Dependency and secret scancargo deny (advisories, licences, bans) + secret scannerNo advisories; no disallowed licences; no secretsEvery pull request and nightly
Preview deployHosting preview environmentA working preview link on the pull requestEvery pull request

Pull requests

  • Branching: Trunk-based: short-lived branches off main, squash-merged within two days.

Review checklist

  • Correctness: does it do what the issue asks, including edge cases?
  • Readability: could a new teammate change it safely?
  • Architecture: is it in the right place, with the right boundaries?
  • Security: inputs, secrets, permissions, dependencies
  • Performance: budgets, queries, bundle size
  • Tests fail when the code is broken (flip a condition and re-run)
  • One approving review; two for auth, migrations or any unsafe block
  • Reviewer checks new .await points for held locks and blocking calls

Definition of done

  • Acceptance criteria met and demoed on the preview link
  • Tests added for new behaviour and every state
  • Accessibility and performance gates green
  • Analytics events named from the experience skill
  • Docs or changelog updated when behaviour changes
  • Integration test covers success, bad input and unauthorised cases
  • clippy clean with no new allow attributes

Release

  • Small pull requests (aim for under 400 changed lines)
  • CI green before review
  • Squash-merge to main; main is always deployable
  • Every release has a written rollback path
  • Merge to main builds a release image; rolling update gated on a readiness endpoint
  • sqlx migrate run executes as a release step and stays backwards compatible

Incidents

  • Roll back by redeploying the previous image tag
  • Blameless note within 48 hours

Generated from the Celestial engineering skill “Rust Axum service” (engineering core v1.0, checked 2026-10-26).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.