super-admin-panel
Skill0 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design privileged platform-operator tools with strict authorization, auditability, safeguards, and operational clarity.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- admin-panelSkill
- ai-agent-interfaceSkill
- ai-chat-interfaceSkill
- ai-dashboardSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- analytics-and-data-visualizationSkill
- animation-and-motionSkill
- api-engineeringSkill
- authentication-and-rbacSkill
- backend-architectureSkill
- component-engineeringSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-engineeringSkill
- design-intelligenceSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- iconographySkill
- image-art-directionSkill
- integrations-and-webhooksSkill
- javascript-typescriptSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- premium-landing-pagesSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- rag-and-knowledge-systemsSkill
- responsive-designSkill
- saas-dashboardSkill
- security-engineeringSkill
- testing-and-qualitySkill
- unslop-engineSkill
- ux-researchSkill
- visual-designSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
- website-architectureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use only for explicitly privileged, platform-wide operational interfaces that can affect tenants, security, billing, or availability.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not use for ordinary organization administration or to create an unaudited shortcut around product permissions.
- Distinctive: line 31
Add reason capture, preview, scoped confirmation, and approval or dual-control for high-impact changes as policy requires.
- Distinctive: line 41
Never display secrets or unrelated tenant data to simplify operations.
- Distinctive: line 42
Prefer reversible actions.
- Distinctive: line 44
Do not treat hidden navigation or client flags as access control.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Super-admin Panel
When to use
Use only for explicitly privileged, platform-wide operational interfaces that can affect tenants, security, billing, or availability.
When not to use
Do not use for ordinary organization administration or to create an unaudited shortcut around product permissions.
Inputs and assumptions
Confirm operator roles, authorization policy, tenant boundaries, incident procedures, approval requirements, sensitive data policy, and audit retention.
Workflow
- Define the minimum operator tasks and least-privilege permission for each.
- Require strong server-side authorization and appropriate re-authentication for sensitive operations.
- Display tenant, environment, and target identity on every consequential action.
- Add reason capture, preview, scoped confirmation, and approval or dual-control for high-impact changes as policy requires.
- Log actor, reason, target, request ID, before/after state where safe, and result; protect logs from tampering.
- Prevent cross-tenant exposure in search, exports, and detail routes.
- Provide safe failure, rollback, and incident-response paths.
Decision rules
- Privilege is explicit, narrow, time-bounded where feasible, and reviewed.
- Never display secrets or unrelated tenant data to simplify operations.
- Prefer reversible actions; require additional checks for irreversible operations.
- Do not treat hidden navigation or client flags as access control.
Example
A tenant suspension flow should explain user impact, verify the selected tenant and environment, capture the operator reason, enforce authorization on the server, and create an audit event.
Common failures
- “God mode” access without scoped roles or traceability.
- Cross-tenant search results leaking data.
- Confirmation dialogs that do not identify the target or consequences.
Validation
Review threat scenarios, authorization tests, tenant isolation, audit completeness, re-authentication, failure recovery, and permission review.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

