api-engineering
Skill0 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design stable, validated, secure APIs with explicit contracts, errors, pagination, and compatibility behavior.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rogue-dev-studio/ai-agents-roguetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- weirdgme/Claude-code-infrastructure-showcasetheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2025
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- weirdgme/Claude-code-infrastructure-showcase★ 4same name
- rogue-dev-studio/ai-agents-rogue★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- admin-panelSkill
- ai-agent-interfaceSkill
- ai-chat-interfaceSkill
- ai-dashboardSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- analytics-and-data-visualizationSkill
- animation-and-motionSkill
- authentication-and-rbacSkill
- backend-architectureSkill
- component-engineeringSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-engineeringSkill
- design-intelligenceSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- iconographySkill
- image-art-directionSkill
- integrations-and-webhooksSkill
- javascript-typescriptSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- premium-landing-pagesSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- rag-and-knowledge-systemsSkill
- responsive-designSkill
- saas-dashboardSkill
- security-engineeringSkill
- super-admin-panelSkill
- testing-and-qualitySkill
- unslop-engineSkill
- ux-researchSkill
- visual-designSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
- website-architectureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use when adding or changing HTTP, RPC, webhook, or internal service contracts.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not introduce a new API style or versioning scheme without compatibility or consumer requirements.
- Distinctive: line 30
Add pagination and bounds for collection endpoints.
- Distinctive: line 33
Add timeouts and rate limits appropriate to the existing platform.
- Distinctive: line 35
Test malformed input, permission boundaries, conflicts, and failures.
- Distinctive: line 39
Do not leak stack traces, secrets, or existence-sensitive data in errors.
- Distinctive: line 53
No pagination or idempotency plan.
- Distinctive: line 57
Check contract examples, schema validation, authorization, error mapping, pagination bounds, compatibility tests, and generated …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
API Engineering
When to use
Use when adding or changing HTTP, RPC, webhook, or internal service contracts.
When not to use
Do not introduce a new API style or versioning scheme without compatibility or consumer requirements.
Inputs and assumptions
Identify callers, authentication, authorization, data ownership, expected volume, latency, compatibility guarantees, and existing schemas.
Workflow
- Define resources and operations around domain behavior.
- Specify request/response schemas, validation, status/error contract, and examples.
- Enforce authorization and tenant scope on the server for every operation.
- Add pagination and bounds for collection endpoints; avoid unbounded responses.
- Define idempotency, concurrency, and retry behavior for writes.
- Add timeouts and rate limits appropriate to the existing platform.
- Version or evolve contracts compatibly; deprecate with a migration path.
- Test malformed input, permission boundaries, conflicts, and failures.
Decision rules
- Do not leak stack traces, secrets, or existence-sensitive data in errors.
- Return stable machine-readable error codes where clients depend on them.
- Validate inputs at runtime even when generated types exist.
- Encode identifiers in URLs and enforce request-size limits.
Example
An update endpoint should distinguish invalid input from a stale revision, so clients can correct data or reload rather than showing a generic success.
Common failures
- Breaking response shapes without versioning or tests.
- Missing authorization on nested resources.
- No pagination or idempotency plan.
Validation
Check contract examples, schema validation, authorization, error mapping, pagination bounds, compatibility tests, and generated documentation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

