admin-panel
Skill0 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design administrative interfaces for safe, permission-aware management of users, settings, and operational data.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- YepAPI/skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 12, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- YepAPI/skills★ 8same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- ai-agent-interfaceSkill
- ai-chat-interfaceSkill
- ai-dashboardSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- analytics-and-data-visualizationSkill
- animation-and-motionSkill
- api-engineeringSkill
- authentication-and-rbacSkill
- backend-architectureSkill
- component-engineeringSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-engineeringSkill
- design-intelligenceSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- iconographySkill
- image-art-directionSkill
- integrations-and-webhooksSkill
- javascript-typescriptSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- premium-landing-pagesSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- rag-and-knowledge-systemsSkill
- responsive-designSkill
- saas-dashboardSkill
- security-engineeringSkill
- super-admin-panelSkill
- testing-and-qualitySkill
- unslop-engineSkill
- ux-researchSkill
- visual-designSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
- website-architectureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use for organization or product administration such as managing members, settings, policies, and operational records.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not expose global platform controls in an organization admin experience or build controls without an authorization requirement.
- Distinctive: line 33
Verify UI gating is backed by server-side authorization.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not rely on obscured buttons as authorization.
- Distinctive: line 39
Avoid destructive bulk actions without a preview and scope confirmation.
- Distinctive: line 40
Keep audit history read-only and filterable by meaningful fields.
- Distinctive: line 55
Test authorized and unauthorized roles, scope boundaries, confirmation, audit events, partial errors, and accessible keyboard operation.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Admin Panel
When to use
Use for organization or product administration such as managing members, settings, policies, and operational records.
When not to use
Do not expose global platform controls in an organization admin experience or build controls without an authorization requirement.
Inputs and assumptions
Identify admin roles, scope (organization/project), permissions, high-risk actions, audit needs, data volume, and current access-control model.
Workflow
- State the active organization and admin scope prominently.
- Group controls by task and risk; distinguish routine settings from destructive actions.
- Show role and permission consequences before changing access.
- For destructive or security-sensitive actions, explain impact, require appropriate confirmation, and provide recovery information where possible.
- Record actor, target, time, and outcome in the backend audit trail.
- Handle partial failure and stale data explicitly.
- Verify UI gating is backed by server-side authorization.
Decision rules
- Least privilege is the default.
- Do not rely on obscured buttons as authorization.
- Avoid destructive bulk actions without a preview and scope confirmation.
- Keep audit history read-only and filterable by meaningful fields.
Example
Removing a member should show which organization is affected and what access ends; if ownership transfer is required, resolve it before removal.
Common failures
- Ambiguous scope, especially in multi-organization products.
- Dangerous actions next to routine controls without distinction.
- UI-only role checks or unaudited privilege changes.
Validation
Test authorized and unauthorized roles, scope boundaries, confirmation, audit events, partial errors, and accessible keyboard operation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

