agentleFS
adymireadymire/CraftLayer/skills/admin-panel/SKILL.md

admin-panel

Skill0 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design administrative interfaces for safe, permission-aware management of users, settings, and operational data.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use for organization or product administration such as managing members, settings, policies, and operational records.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not expose global platform controls in an organization admin experience or build controls without an authorization requirement.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify UI gating is backed by server-side authorization.

    line 33
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not rely on obscured buttons as authorization.

    line 38
  5. Distinctive:

    Avoid destructive bulk actions without a preview and scope confirmation.

    line 39
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep audit history read-only and filterable by meaningful fields.

    line 40
  7. Distinctive:

    Test authorized and unauthorized roles, scope boundaries, confirmation, audit events, partial errors, and accessible keyboard operation.

    line 55

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Admin Panel

When to use

Use for organization or product administration such as managing members, settings, policies, and operational records.

When not to use

Do not expose global platform controls in an organization admin experience or build controls without an authorization requirement.

Inputs and assumptions

Identify admin roles, scope (organization/project), permissions, high-risk actions, audit needs, data volume, and current access-control model.

Workflow

  1. State the active organization and admin scope prominently.
  2. Group controls by task and risk; distinguish routine settings from destructive actions.
  3. Show role and permission consequences before changing access.
  4. For destructive or security-sensitive actions, explain impact, require appropriate confirmation, and provide recovery information where possible.
  5. Record actor, target, time, and outcome in the backend audit trail.
  6. Handle partial failure and stale data explicitly.
  7. Verify UI gating is backed by server-side authorization.

Decision rules

  • Least privilege is the default.
  • Do not rely on obscured buttons as authorization.
  • Avoid destructive bulk actions without a preview and scope confirmation.
  • Keep audit history read-only and filterable by meaningful fields.

Example

Removing a member should show which organization is affected and what access ends; if ownership transfer is required, resolve it before removal.

Common failures

  • Ambiguous scope, especially in multi-organization products.
  • Dangerous actions next to routine controls without distinction.
  • UI-only role checks or unaudited privilege changes.

Validation

Test authorized and unauthorized roles, scope boundaries, confirmation, audit events, partial errors, and accessible keyboard operation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.