ai-dashboard
Skill0 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Make AI-system health, usage, cost, quality, and operational status understandable to the people responsible for it.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- admin-panelSkill
- ai-agent-interfaceSkill
- ai-chat-interfaceSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- analytics-and-data-visualizationSkill
- animation-and-motionSkill
- api-engineeringSkill
- authentication-and-rbacSkill
- backend-architectureSkill
- component-engineeringSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-engineeringSkill
- design-intelligenceSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- iconographySkill
- image-art-directionSkill
- integrations-and-webhooksSkill
- javascript-typescriptSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- premium-landing-pagesSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- rag-and-knowledge-systemsSkill
- responsive-designSkill
- saas-dashboardSkill
- security-engineeringSkill
- super-admin-panelSkill
- testing-and-qualitySkill
- unslop-engineSkill
- ux-researchSkill
- visual-designSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
- website-architectureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use for monitoring AI applications, model providers, agents, evaluations, usage, or operational quality.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not present invented model metrics, imply quality from token volume, or expose prompts and user data without an approved privacy design.
- Distinctive: line 33
Test aggregation boundaries, missing telemetry, and permission controls.
- Distinctive: line 38
Never expose secrets, private prompts, or customer data by default.
- Distinctive: line 55
Verify metric math, time ranges, sampling/retention disclosure, redaction, drill-down permissions, and behavior when telemetry is absent or …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI Dashboard
When to use
Use for monitoring AI applications, model providers, agents, evaluations, usage, or operational quality.
When not to use
Do not present invented model metrics, imply quality from token volume, or expose prompts and user data without an approved privacy design.
Inputs and assumptions
Identify operators, decisions, telemetry sources, metric definitions, sampling, retention, privacy constraints, and alert actions.
Workflow
- Define the operator questions: availability, latency, errors, spend, quality, safety, and workload.
- Name each metric's source, unit, period, aggregation, and known gaps.
- Separate system status from model-evaluation quality and human feedback.
- Provide filters and drill-downs to traces with redaction and access controls.
- Explain thresholds and alerts; show when data is delayed or sampled.
- Offer actionable next steps for common incidents.
- Test aggregation boundaries, missing telemetry, and permission controls.
Decision rules
- Token count or user rating alone does not establish model quality.
- Never expose secrets, private prompts, or customer data by default.
- Distinguish estimated cost from billed cost and indicate currency.
- Show time zone and aggregation windows.
Example
An error-rate chart should define which requests count as errors and link to redacted failure traces; a raw model label is not an explanation.
Common failures
- Unlabeled usage totals and misleading time comparisons.
- Treating model/provider availability as end-to-end product availability.
- Alert panels without ownership or response guidance.
Validation
Verify metric math, time ranges, sampling/retention disclosure, redaction, drill-down permissions, and behavior when telemetry is absent or delayed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

